The real genius is in building a career where you can get like that.All Buffet has to do is buy some stock, tell people he has bought it, and when it skyrockets sell it off again. Rinse repeat. Genius.
The real genius is in building a career where you can get like that.All Buffet has to do is buy some stock, tell people he has bought it, and when it skyrockets sell it off again. Rinse repeat. Genius.
He probably doesn't even need to actually buy it...All Buffet has to do is buy some stock, tell people he has bought it, and when it skyrockets sell it off again. Rinse repeat. Genius.
*affect
Grammar Police out.
Absolutely. The article mentions he has an effect on stocks. Not that he effects them. Buffet actually affects the stocks, which resultes in an effect on the stocks. Got it?
All Buffet has to do is buy some stock, tell people he has bought it, and when it skyrockets sell it off again. Rinse repeat.
He would never sell at a loss. You don't lose money until you lock it in.Until the market crashes or some new bad news about that company appears before he sells. Then he loses big time. On paper.
But the deal is that AAPL has a low P/E compared to other companies in the same sector, and pays a dividend above 2%, which is exactly the type of deal into which a Dodd "value investor" looks to beat the market over a much longer time frame, well past short term market volatility and random up-and-down pricing noise.
I think that might be clasified as pump and dump...
Not sure though
He would never sell at a loss. You don't lose money until you lock it in.
Until the market crashes or some new bad news about that company appears before he sells. Then he loses big time. On paper.
But the deal is that AAPL has a low P/E compared to other companies in the same sector, and pays a dividend above 2%, which is exactly the type of deal into which a Dodd "value investor" looks to beat the market over a much longer time frame, well past short term market volatility and random up-and-down pricing noise.
Thanks for the advice! Looks like they fixed it.See rule #8 in the forum rules for how to effectively (affectively?) deal with spelling/usage errors in published news articles. I regularly send in corrections; the staff always thanks me for doing that. I usually send a link to the appropriate entry in the Paul Brians usage error list, but I'd guess they don't need it.