As soon as they release this, there are going to be legions of people screaming "waaa it's far too small waaa, Apple has lost its way" etc etc
Can we see a photo of your setup?!I have six connected to my MacPro, with the ability to use 10. I don't think I can do that with an iPhone.
Post #18 in this thread…Can we see a photo of your setup?!
They won’t even let an iPad run a real OS! How would they ever allow cannibalization like that? I think whatever company makes the first all-in-one device is the one that wins. Not the company that makes an ecosystem of products that proprietarily work together in an anti-competitive state to stifle competition and maximize shareholder value so Tim Crook can get rich. First kick out all the competition. Second make the shareholders understand value. Third don’t care about the long-term bad will against customers and focus only on maximizing profits now. It’s not capitalism. It’s anti-competitive capitalism.Just thinking about the crazy horsepower these devices come with these days. I’ve got an iPhone 15 pro, I can already use it as a console. Connect a controller to it, HDMI out to a tv, boom I’m playing call of duty or resident evil with Xbox quality graphics.
Apple should sell some sort of adapter whereby you plug it in, and it sends full macOS desktop environment to your monitor. Imagine this device becoming the only device you need.
Full macOS at your desk, mobile phone on the go.
What about thermals you say? Well this adapter could come with a fan in it, just like a-
Submarine, Mr. Wayne. Just like a submarine.
But no just like a.. desktop computer. This adapter could also have your ports etc.
I mean I know why they don’t. Because they’d lose a lot of sales in desktops. But I understand Samsung already does this, and windows was doing this back in like 2016 or something. It would be an innovation if done right would really push these phones to the next level.
The only issue I see with “whichever company makes it first” is you have Apple and android. However android doesn’t have a desktop environment aside from some chromebooks that I don’t even know if they make them.They won’t even let an iPad run a real OS! How would they ever allow cannibalization like that? I think whatever company makes the first all-in-one device is the one that wins. Not the company that makes an ecosystem of products that proprietarily work together in an anti-competitive state to stifle competition and maximize shareholder value so Tim Crook can get rich. First kick out all the competition. Second make the shareholders understand value. Third don’t care about the long-term bad will against customers and focus only on maximizing profits now. It’s not capitalism. It’s anti-competitive capitalism.
Eventually, we will wear a pair of glasses then have contacts lasered onto our eyes that do everything any device could do; then one day we will just embed our brains in a matrix and realize there is no spoon (computer).
Its as „strange“ as people using a MB in clamshell mode. Or a mini. With the benefit of having to buy only one device.I think the idea of a phone that transforms into a completely different product only when connecting a cable, mouse and keyboard sounds like a strange concept, which should already raise alarms even before getting into specific problems.
The main issue is: when will you have all the required hardware with you, but not a computer (which will do a much better job) as well? It’s a very niche, close to nonexistent use case, that would carry a lot of tradeoffs. Not a good deal.
Some obvious problems: how to handle a partition of macOS/iOS, how to handle the reboot to switch between OS, how to handle the secure enclave (FaceID), how to handle the iPhone’s hardware — can you use its camera? Can you use its LiDAR (then you need a new API)? — etc.
I saw you ran out of room on the displays, so you brought in a pocket watch to tell the time. True class...Post #18 in this thread…
Alternatively, just click on the URL in my signature where it says 'Six Displays'.
I am always curious as to what people consider a 'real' operating system. The ability to natively decompress 7z files, tinker with the update URL direction or something equally as obtuse?They won’t even let an iPad run a real OS!
Since iPads don't get MacOS, it's even less likely that iPhones will get MacOS.Just thinking about the crazy horsepower these devices come with these days. I’ve got an iPhone 15 pro, I can already use it as a console. Connect a controller to it, HDMI out to a tv, boom I’m playing call of duty or resident evil with Xbox quality graphics.
Apple should sell some sort of adapter whereby you plug it in, and it sends full macOS desktop environment to your monitor. Imagine this device becoming the only device you need.
Full macOS at your desk, mobile phone on the go.
What about thermals you say? Well this adapter could come with a fan in it, just like a-
Submarine, Mr. Wayne. Just like a submarine.
But no just like a.. desktop computer. This adapter could also have your ports etc.
I mean I know why they don’t. Because they’d lose a lot of sales in desktops. But I understand Samsung already does this, and windows was doing this back in like 2016 or something. It would be an innovation if done right would really push these phones to the next level.
How about hiding an ad on a video by putting it behind a window of another webpage?I am always curious as to what people consider a 'real' operating system. The ability to natively decompress 7z files, tinker with the update URL direction or something equally as obtuse?
I won't deny its fun to tinker with MacOS, particularly better, older versions. But there is also very little that I cannot do on an iPad Pro and I use it for a lot of broad, niche things that to use a desktopOS for would require an extra $5000 of equipment on top of the computer itself.
I mean, a Macbook Pro cannot even create 3D area scans for Twinmotion or film experiments at 120 degrees in 4K without any additional hardware. How is that even a real computer?![]()
Different tools mean different things to different people. I imagine a chef wouldn't want to use my swiss army knife in his kitchen but I wouldn't want to take his ultra sharp 12" meat cleaver campingHow about hiding an ad on a video by putting it behind a window of another webpage?
How about having 3 Pages documents open at the same time?
Or any kind of spreadsheet work done in, you know, an office setting? Name 1 company using iPads for their payroll and accounting teams.
Jack of all trades, master of none. The idea of a single device able to chameleon into a variety of use-cases is not new, and we're certainly closer to that ideal than we've ever been before (consider how performant a MacBook Pro can be at tasks that once required a desktop Mac). But it is not without tradeoffs, which (again) become more present the more that the form factor of the host becomes compromised to serve mobility.
Different tools mean different things to different people. I imagine a chef wouldn't want to use my swiss army knife in his kitchen but I wouldn't want to take his ultra sharp 12" meat cleaver campingBoth have merits depending on the job but neither is a lesser product because of it.
Apple won't do this because they build custom hardware and software, then sell it as a perfect solution. They don't believe in half-assing it.
Apple TV could run macOS any day. It has HDMI and Ethernet. But they won't let it happen because Apple doesn't believe it's good enough.
And I’ll quote the November 21, 2024 issue of CNET Insider:It is way more useful to be able to easily share the data between your devices. Which is the direction Apple chose.
Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night (as Dylan Thomas Once Said to His Walkman)
For nearly 20 years, mobile devices -- the marvelous, ubiquitous mobile phone, in particular -- have been reducing the need to carry around separate gadgets. Even Apple acknowledged that fact in its weird "Crush!" ad for the iPad Pro (the company then apologized for acknowledging it). Devices that slip into a pocket have subsequently killed entire categories, such as the compact camera, and gaming phones may one day replace consoles themselves.
Yet, there are inevitable compromises when a device tries to do too much. For instance, while Bluetooth headphones are "fine," the fact that phones had to get rid of a headphone jack to make room for other features has long irritated me. So much so that I've started using -- and enjoying -- a Sony MP3 Walkman again. I personally think it’s this frustration with technology's shortcomings that is driving a counterrevolution. Not coincidentally, we've seen the resurgence of vinyl, cassettes and even film cameras in recent years. May these single-use devices, and our love for them, "rage against the dying of the light."
Ty Pendlebury
Editor, CNET
I don't want macOS on a touch device. That design pattern would have terrible consequences for the real desktop experience (see Windows 8).
That said, we NEED true data management capabilities on iPadOS/iOS. Give me a terminal, a real file manager, access to system files, and the ability to install any software I like, and I'll be happy. (Listing it out like this makes it sound like a lot, but it's really not.)
Spot-on. I can dream.
In other words, you want a jailbroken iPhone/iPad. With Apple's blessing.
Having used jailbroken phones for years, I do not object to the term. People think there is something illicit about the term, but it comes from UNIX.Spot-on. I can dream.
I object to the word "jailbroken".
I see your point. Even so, I'd say "jailbroken" has a pretty negative connotation in common parlance. Same with "sideloading". While not explicitly bad, it still reflects an attitude that we have about smartphones that I dislike. You don't sideload on a "real computer" (a desktop).Having used jailbroken phones for years, I do not object to the term. People think there is something illicit about the term, but it comes from UNIX.
Secondly, if you're in the USA, every seven years the Congressional Librarian has decreed that jailbroken devices are an exception to the DMCA. So, there's nothing 'illegal' about it.
Third, some people see it as 'breaking out of Apple's walled garden'. So, in that context, there's nothing bad about that either.
I agree, which is why I try to 'educate' (as best I can) whenever I come across that negative viewpoint in the main iPhone forum. I've been here since 2011, and by now my stance is probably well-known. And I believe some probably don't appreciate that 'education' - or at least my opening my mouth about it.I see your point. Even so, I'd say "jailbroken" has a pretty negative connotation in common parlance. Same with "sideloading". While not explicitly bad, it still reflects an attitude that we have about smartphones that I dislike. You don't sideload on a "real computer" (a desktop).
No, it's not because they'd lose a lot of sales in desktops.I mean I know why they don’t. Because they’d lose a lot of sales in desktops.
That's right.So, you seek to dispel the negative connotation around those words?
Hey, you've changed my mind, not that it counts for much.That's right.
How successful I am, have been or ever can be is debatable though.