Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Just thinking about the crazy horsepower these devices come with these days. I’ve got an iPhone 15 pro, I can already use it as a console. Connect a controller to it, HDMI out to a tv, boom I’m playing call of duty or resident evil with Xbox quality graphics.

Apple should sell some sort of adapter whereby you plug it in, and it sends full macOS desktop environment to your monitor. Imagine this device becoming the only device you need.

Full macOS at your desk, mobile phone on the go.

What about thermals you say? Well this adapter could come with a fan in it, just like a-

Submarine, Mr. Wayne. Just like a submarine.

But no just like a.. desktop computer. This adapter could also have your ports etc.
I mean I know why they don’t. Because they’d lose a lot of sales in desktops. But I understand Samsung already does this, and windows was doing this back in like 2016 or something. It would be an innovation if done right would really push these phones to the next level.
They won’t even let an iPad run a real OS! How would they ever allow cannibalization like that? I think whatever company makes the first all-in-one device is the one that wins. Not the company that makes an ecosystem of products that proprietarily work together in an anti-competitive state to stifle competition and maximize shareholder value so Tim Crook can get rich. First kick out all the competition. Second make the shareholders understand value. Third don’t care about the long-term bad will against customers and focus only on maximizing profits now. It’s not capitalism. It’s anti-competitive capitalism.

Eventually, we will wear a pair of glasses then have contacts lasered onto our eyes that do everything any device could do; then one day we will just embed our brains in a matrix and realize there is no spoon (computer).
 
  • Like
Reactions: disaac
They won’t even let an iPad run a real OS! How would they ever allow cannibalization like that? I think whatever company makes the first all-in-one device is the one that wins. Not the company that makes an ecosystem of products that proprietarily work together in an anti-competitive state to stifle competition and maximize shareholder value so Tim Crook can get rich. First kick out all the competition. Second make the shareholders understand value. Third don’t care about the long-term bad will against customers and focus only on maximizing profits now. It’s not capitalism. It’s anti-competitive capitalism.

Eventually, we will wear a pair of glasses then have contacts lasered onto our eyes that do everything any device could do; then one day we will just embed our brains in a matrix and realize there is no spoon (computer).
The only issue I see with “whichever company makes it first” is you have Apple and android. However android doesn’t have a desktop environment aside from some chromebooks that I don’t even know if they make them.

The other major player is windows. And I know Microsoft tried already but I highly doubt it was the full service I am envisioning.
 
I think the idea of a phone that transforms into a completely different product only when connecting a cable, mouse and keyboard sounds like a strange concept, which should already raise alarms even before getting into specific problems.

The main issue is: when will you have all the required hardware with you, but not a computer (which will do a much better job) as well? It’s a very niche, close to nonexistent use case, that would carry a lot of tradeoffs. Not a good deal.

Some obvious problems: how to handle a partition of macOS/iOS, how to handle the reboot to switch between OS, how to handle the secure enclave (FaceID), how to handle the iPhone’s hardware — can you use its camera? Can you use its LiDAR (then you need a new API)? — etc.
Its as „strange“ as people using a MB in clamshell mode. Or a mini. With the benefit of having to buy only one device.

Btw its only one usbC cable to a monitor. Like charging your phone. The keyboard and trackpad are usually connected to the monitor.

The rest of your concerns is only software which can be solved
 
  • Love
Reactions: LionTeeth
  • Haha
Reactions: eyoungren
the hardware already exist, just the software is lacking.
61O2VhK84CL._AC_SX679_.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: maerz001
There have been apps which allow you to control your Mac from another device, such as Parallels access. It worked but was difficult to use given the smaller display space available on portable devices.

That product has been discontinued.
 
They won’t even let an iPad run a real OS!
I am always curious as to what people consider a 'real' operating system. The ability to natively decompress 7z files, tinker with the update URL direction or something equally as obtuse?

I won't deny its fun to tinker with MacOS, particularly better, older versions. But there is also very little that I cannot do on an iPad Pro and I use it for a lot of broad, niche things that to use a desktopOS for would require an extra $5000 of equipment on top of the computer itself.

I mean, a Macbook Pro cannot even create 3D area scans for Twinmotion or film experiments at 120 degrees in 4K without any additional hardware. How is that even a real computer? ;)
 
Just thinking about the crazy horsepower these devices come with these days. I’ve got an iPhone 15 pro, I can already use it as a console. Connect a controller to it, HDMI out to a tv, boom I’m playing call of duty or resident evil with Xbox quality graphics.

Apple should sell some sort of adapter whereby you plug it in, and it sends full macOS desktop environment to your monitor. Imagine this device becoming the only device you need.

Full macOS at your desk, mobile phone on the go.

What about thermals you say? Well this adapter could come with a fan in it, just like a-

Submarine, Mr. Wayne. Just like a submarine.

But no just like a.. desktop computer. This adapter could also have your ports etc.
I mean I know why they don’t. Because they’d lose a lot of sales in desktops. But I understand Samsung already does this, and windows was doing this back in like 2016 or something. It would be an innovation if done right would really push these phones to the next level.
Since iPads don't get MacOS, it's even less likely that iPhones will get MacOS.

It's the future we're all dreaming of- when the phone all the computing power we need (which it basically does now). But for... reasons... it's not going to happen for another decade at least.
 
I am always curious as to what people consider a 'real' operating system. The ability to natively decompress 7z files, tinker with the update URL direction or something equally as obtuse?

I won't deny its fun to tinker with MacOS, particularly better, older versions. But there is also very little that I cannot do on an iPad Pro and I use it for a lot of broad, niche things that to use a desktopOS for would require an extra $5000 of equipment on top of the computer itself.

I mean, a Macbook Pro cannot even create 3D area scans for Twinmotion or film experiments at 120 degrees in 4K without any additional hardware. How is that even a real computer? ;)
How about hiding an ad on a video by putting it behind a window of another webpage?

How about having 3 Pages documents open at the same time?

Or any kind of spreadsheet work done in, you know, an office setting? Name 1 company using iPads for their payroll and accounting teams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LionTeeth
How about hiding an ad on a video by putting it behind a window of another webpage?

How about having 3 Pages documents open at the same time?

Or any kind of spreadsheet work done in, you know, an office setting? Name 1 company using iPads for their payroll and accounting teams.
Different tools mean different things to different people. I imagine a chef wouldn't want to use my swiss army knife in his kitchen but I wouldn't want to take his ultra sharp 12" meat cleaver camping :) Both have merits depending on the job but neither is a lesser product because of it.
 
This:
Jack of all trades, master of none. The idea of a single device able to chameleon into a variety of use-cases is not new, and we're certainly closer to that ideal than we've ever been before (consider how performant a MacBook Pro can be at tasks that once required a desktop Mac). But it is not without tradeoffs, which (again) become more present the more that the form factor of the host becomes compromised to serve mobility.
Different tools mean different things to different people. I imagine a chef wouldn't want to use my swiss army knife in his kitchen but I wouldn't want to take his ultra sharp 12" meat cleaver camping :) Both have merits depending on the job but neither is a lesser product because of it.
Apple won't do this because they build custom hardware and software, then sell it as a perfect solution. They don't believe in half-assing it.

Apple TV could run macOS any day. It has HDMI and Ethernet. But they won't let it happen because Apple doesn't believe it's good enough.
It is way more useful to be able to easily share the data between your devices. Which is the direction Apple chose.
And I’ll quote the November 21, 2024 issue of CNET Insider:
Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night (as Dylan Thomas Once Said to His Walkman)

For nearly 20 years, mobile devices -- the marvelous, ubiquitous mobile phone, in particular -- have been reducing the need to carry around separate gadgets. Even Apple acknowledged that fact in its weird "Crush!" ad for the iPad Pro (the company then apologized for acknowledging it). Devices that slip into a pocket have subsequently killed entire categories, such as the compact camera, and gaming phones may one day replace consoles themselves.

Yet, there are inevitable compromises when a device tries to do too much. For instance, while Bluetooth headphones are "fine," the fact that phones had to get rid of a headphone jack to make room for other features has long irritated me. So much so that I've started using -- and enjoying -- a Sony MP3 Walkman again. I personally think it’s this frustration with technology's shortcomings that is driving a counterrevolution. Not coincidentally, we've seen the resurgence of vinyl, cassettes and even film cameras in recent years. May these single-use devices, and our love for them, "rage against the dying of the light."

Ty Pendlebury

Editor, CNET
 
I don't want macOS on a touch device. That design pattern would have terrible consequences for the real desktop experience (see Windows 8).

That said, we NEED true data management capabilities on iPadOS/iOS. Give me a terminal, a real file manager, access to system files, and the ability to install any software I like, and I'll be happy. (Listing it out like this makes it sound like a lot, but it's really not.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Timpetus
I don't want macOS on a touch device. That design pattern would have terrible consequences for the real desktop experience (see Windows 8).

That said, we NEED true data management capabilities on iPadOS/iOS. Give me a terminal, a real file manager, access to system files, and the ability to install any software I like, and I'll be happy. (Listing it out like this makes it sound like a lot, but it's really not.)
;)

In other words, you want a jailbroken iPhone/iPad. With Apple's blessing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Timpetus
Spot-on. I can dream.

I object to the word "jailbroken".
Having used jailbroken phones for years, I do not object to the term. People think there is something illicit about the term, but it comes from UNIX.

Secondly, if you're in the USA, every seven years the Congressional Librarian has decreed that jailbroken devices are an exception to the DMCA. So, there's nothing 'illegal' about it.

Third, some people see it as 'breaking out of Apple's walled garden'. So, in that context, there's nothing bad about that either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Timpetus
Having used jailbroken phones for years, I do not object to the term. People think there is something illicit about the term, but it comes from UNIX.

Secondly, if you're in the USA, every seven years the Congressional Librarian has decreed that jailbroken devices are an exception to the DMCA. So, there's nothing 'illegal' about it.

Third, some people see it as 'breaking out of Apple's walled garden'. So, in that context, there's nothing bad about that either.
I see your point. Even so, I'd say "jailbroken" has a pretty negative connotation in common parlance. Same with "sideloading". While not explicitly bad, it still reflects an attitude that we have about smartphones that I dislike. You don't sideload on a "real computer" (a desktop).
 
  • Like
Reactions: eyoungren
I see your point. Even so, I'd say "jailbroken" has a pretty negative connotation in common parlance. Same with "sideloading". While not explicitly bad, it still reflects an attitude that we have about smartphones that I dislike. You don't sideload on a "real computer" (a desktop).
I agree, which is why I try to 'educate' (as best I can) whenever I come across that negative viewpoint in the main iPhone forum. I've been here since 2011, and by now my stance is probably well-known. And I believe some probably don't appreciate that 'education' - or at least my opening my mouth about it.

In any case, I will continue to fight against that negativity.
 
I mean I know why they don’t. Because they’d lose a lot of sales in desktops.
No, it's not because they'd lose a lot of sales in desktops.

It's because in reality, there are not enough users that warrant spending the time and money to make this a thing. You grossly overestimate how many people would actually buy into a product like this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacCheetah3
One of those ideas that sounds cool and futuristic until you actually think about it in daily usage.
I don’t know about most people, but if I’m ever using a computer with a keyboard and a mouse, I’m usually stationary.
Meanwhile, my phone is always portable, wherever I go it goes.
Just imagining the constant plugging and unplugging and re-plugging and unplugging of a massive daisy chain of a keyboard, mouse, display, speaker, webcam and whatever thing we’re using to power the phone so it doesn’t chew through the battery every time I get up from my desk and want to take my phone along…
I think people are also over estimating the thermal envelope of the iPhone, you really think you’re gonna be splicing FinalCut Pro clips one second, then you unplug it, and the thing immediately drops down to the power level of your regular phone again that quickly? No, the thing would be boiling.

And it isn’t even comparable to clamshell mode on a laptop.
Stage manager on the iPad might be a better comparison,but at the end of the day, you are still running iPhone apps off of your iPhone, which is a very different situation than actually having a Mac or PC.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.