Absolutely non upgradable Macs?
‘because these 3 are absolute disposable appliances.
Changing to Arm doesn’t make them any more non-upgradeable than they already are.
Absolutely non upgradable Macs?
‘because these 3 are absolute disposable appliances.
In this “interview”, Craig Federighi is adamant about touch not comjngMacs.We *will* eventually get Apple Pencil support, 5G support, faceid, touch, etc.
I saw a similar video, iphone vs imac and was insane.Maybe you should watch this video, pretty impressive about what the A14 is capable of doing. The M1 is even more powerful than the A14. Apple is shattering the old ideas of how CPUs are designed and their power requirements.
This was my first thought as well when Apple announced the M1. It makes perfect sense.I mean, just think about Apple TV with an m1-style chip in it - will Apple finally try (post-Pippin) to compete with consoles for real?
Mine left Alaska at 2:30 this afternoon, UPS says I should receive it tomorrow in the afternoon.Does the embargo on youtube lift on monday or tuesday?
It is pretty insane how powerful the A14 is in a low power package. I am really looking forward to seeing the reviews of the new 2020 MacBook Air.I saw a similar video, iphone vs imac and was insane.
granted, im not an expert, so only went with the overall result.
these chips seems to be as good as they claimed, but still waiting on real reviews.
UPS says mine will be here tomorrowThose results look terrific.
Hope my M1 MBA arrives earlier than is predicted!
Here’s a few nuggets to think about.. Steve Jobs died in 2011.. First iPhone with Apple silicon was released in 2013.. Which means Steve was part of that decision of developing their own chips and that this was part of the roadmap all along...
It is Jobs' vision, to build a computer as an appliance. It harkens the days Apple created the Mac (and then the imac)Absolutely non upgradable Macs?
‘because these 3 are absolute disposable appliances.
“By generation two of the ARM era, I believe you will see the full benefits of the switch, with ARM Macs achieving 120% performance on integer code with maybe 80% of the power consumption.”In september 2014 I started making predictions about Mac’s moving to Arm, and why they would perform better.
![]()
So, yes, I knew for more than a year.
And I didn’t “hand wave.” You made the outrageous argument that what Apple is doing is outside the mainstream of CPU architecture. Your burden to explain why. And saying “the ram is on the chip” when that isn’t even true doesn’t help your arguments.
I named chips that do have the features you mentioned. I don’t understand how that is “hand waving.”
The fact is, everything Apple is known to be doing is stuff that is in the standard CPU designer’s toolbox, and stuff that you’d find in Hennessy and Patterson. Nothing outrageous.
The reason it is so fast is that they are using the same things we did at AMD to design x86’s, but doing it for a much cleaner RISC architecture.
If I recall correctly, the idea was to make the computer to be as easy to use as an appliance.It is Jobs' vision, to build a computer as an appliance. It harkens the days Apple created the Mac (and then the imac)
Lets see when the imac and mac pro are replaced.Changing to Arm doesn’t make them any more non-upgradeable than they already are.
The A4 was first launched in the first iPad in 2010 and was discontinued in 2013.Here’s a few nuggets to think about.. Steve Jobs died in 2011.. First iPhone with Apple silicon was released in 2013.. Which means Steve was part of that decision of developing their own chips and that this was part of the roadmap all along...
If I recall correctly, the idea was to make the computer to be as easy to use as an appliance.
which was a good plan, given how hard it was for non techie people on those days to use a home computer.
Under Tim Cooks, is just overpriced disposable appliances.
I still have a 2015 13" MacBook Pro and 2015 27" iMac running the latest macOS and working quite well. So I don't view them as disposable appliances. The same is true for the 2015 iPone 6S+ I still use. Lasted me 5 years and will be replaced this year with a iPhone 12 Pro Max.Under Tim Cooks, is just overpriced disposable appliances.
Oh well, a true d*ck, as I remember.Steve jobs never wanted macs to be user-upgradeable or serviceable.
Folklore.org: Diagnostic Port
www.folklore.org
You missed the point.I still have a 2015 13" MacBook Pro and 2015 27" iMac running the latest macOS and working quite well. So I don't view them as disposable appliances. The same is true for the 2015 iPone 6S+ I still use. Lasted me 5 years and will be replaced this year with a iPhone 12 Pro Max.
Oh well, a true d*ck, as I remember.
a shame that his mentality not only prevailed, but still enforced and defended by the cult members.
Much better choices indeed!There is a certain logic to it. and for people who really value slots and sockets and the like, there are plenty of other choices.
Seems the question would be were these folk running this software on their MacBook Airs, entry-level MacBook Pros or Mac Minis in the first place?Well I think that all depends on whether or not you can do the things you want to do on it.
Having the fastest computer in the world, or a computer with 20 hours of battery life, doesn’t mean a damn thing if you cant run the programs you want/need to run on it.
I’m not in that camp; the M1 Macs run everything I need. That doesn’t mean I don’t empathize with those in the opposite camp.
There is a small percentage of customers that are concerned about upgrading the hardware of their Apple computers.You missed the point.
those devices can be upgraded and repaired by you, if you want.
current ones? Not so much.
The way I see it, it’s not much different. Jobs was so against the original Mac having even any expansion slots originally. As I see it, the current Apple is just extending that vision, of course, to the annoyance of some. I myself am annoyed. I can understand laptops being less user upgradeable due to its form factor. But I’m really annoyed when Apple made it so difficult for users to upgrade the RAM and drive on desktops like the Mac mini.If I recall correctly, the idea was to make the computer to be as easy to use as an appliance.
which was a good plan, given how hard it was for non techie people on those days to use a home computer.
Under Tim Cooks, is just overpriced disposable appliances.
No matter how many times it gets said, people still don’t get it.Seems the question would be were these folk running this software on their MacBook Airs, entry-level MacBook Pros or Mac Minis in the first place?
If not, then what are we even arguing about in this forum? Other than the Mac Mini, the computers that the M1 is in maxed out at 16 gb even as Intel versions!