All anyone has to do is think to themselves, just WHY is the iPod Classic STILL being made?? A LOT of audiophiles use them for lossless audio portability, a 128GB flash iPod would be great for people like yourself.
As for the apps, totally agree, it's why I think the new Fire HD will sell well against the Nexus 7, it's why I plan to go from 16GB iPhone to 32GB when the new one comes out. Apps eat storage like nothing, especially HD content.
IMO Apple have shot themselves in the foot a bit by not launching a 128GB iPad option yet.
I do not understand how anyone could use 128GB. It is simply unreasonably large amount of storage space. It is incredibly hard to use 128GB worth of music (assuming one uses them for music and not storing hundreds of apps they don't open), I mean that is just WAY too many songs to choose from, like you would literally never listen to most of them. Generally you listen to certain groups of songs you like, and most of them you never end up playing, like I have so many songs on my 8GB iPod Touch that I literally never play because I just don't feel like listening to them. It's just for those people who want every song they own, no matter how many plays it has on their device (0 being the majority) just because.
All anyone has to do is think to themselves, just WHY is the iPod Classic STILL being made?? A LOT of audiophiles use them for lossless audio portability, a 128GB flash iPod would be great for people like yourself.
As for the apps, totally agree, it's why I think the new Fire HD will sell well against the Nexus 7, it's why I plan to go from 16GB iPhone to 32GB when the new one comes out. Apps eat storage like nothing, especially HD content.
IMO Apple have shot themselves in the foot a bit by not launching a 128GB iPad option yet.
The only real complaint I have with my iPT is the camera. Bump it up to the one used in the iPhone 4S and it would be sweet.
No "bump up" without a "bump" - the thinness of the iPT and the laws of physics constrains the optical path. If Apple were willing to put out a phoneless iDevice in the case size of the latest phone, with the room they'd have they could do amazing things with photography - i.e., with mirrors, re-direct of the light path, true optical zoom, more light-gathering capacity and more. Plus the entire iPT app library - iCloud, PhotoStream, integration with Twitter and facebook, etc. Which would be lights out for the already fading traditional P&S cams.Yes, it looks like camera from the very first camera phone.
after owning an iPhone and being able to stream any podcast or song wherever i am along with any video via the Pogoplug app - the though of going back to an iPod makes me feel "cut off" lol
however, if they came out with a red iPod shuffle, i would get it for running
Lauded for practically everything it does, Apple utterly failed with the current iPod Nano. Of course, the usual chorus of, 'We Meant Well..' will apply. But for a company having so much industrial-design horsepower, this was an epic fail for these reasons: too small, 'which end is up, anyway?', and no way to track the progress of the selection you're listening to.
Small is nice...to a point. The iPod Nano that this one replaced was actually a better, more friendlier design. You always knew 'which end was up.' I got my current-generation Nano as part of the replacement program Apple offered, so I was 'given' it...I didn't 'choose' it (and then regret it afterward).
Apple:
Please kill the iPod Classic with a hard drive & kill the Shuffle too.
Just have the iPod NANO as the intro - econo - sports POD model & have the iPOD Touch as the higher end POD without a phone.
This follows the usual Papa Bear / Mama Bear / Baby Bear lines that you usually have in your other products:
iPhone / iPod Touch / iPod Nano.
Simplify.
Why would you want Apple to kill the Classic if people are still buying it? I bought mine in June and I hear of others buying Classics as well all the time here and on the Apple forums.
The Nano is now a wrist watch. That's what people are buying it for. Apple needs to run with that. Keep the Nike stuff. Add some movies and screen savers. Give it Bluetooth to ditch the cable and perhaps make it an iPhone Nano someday. But, keep it a watch.
The Nano is now a wrist watch. That's what people are buying it for. Apple needs to run with that. Keep the Nike stuff. Add some movies and screen savers. Give it Bluetooth to ditch the cable and perhaps make it an iPhone Nano someday. But, keep it a watch.
Lauded for practically everything it does, Apple utterly failed with the current iPod Nano. Of course, the usual chorus of, 'We Meant Well..' will apply. But for a company having so much industrial-design horsepower, this was an epic fail for these reasons: too small, 'which end is up, anyway?', and no way to track the progress of the selection you're listening to.
Small is nice...to a point. The iPod Nano that this one replaced was actually a better, more friendlier design. You always knew 'which end was up.' I got my current-generation Nano as part of the replacement program Apple offered, so I was 'given' it...I didn't 'choose' it (and then regret it afterward).
I was actually wondering that myself. Something tells me the iPad Mini is the "new iPod Touch"...