Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
All anyone has to do is think to themselves, just WHY is the iPod Classic STILL being made?? A LOT of audiophiles use them for lossless audio portability, a 128GB flash iPod would be great for people like yourself.

As for the apps, totally agree, it's why I think the new Fire HD will sell well against the Nexus 7, it's why I plan to go from 16GB iPhone to 32GB when the new one comes out. Apps eat storage like nothing, especially HD content.

IMO Apple have shot themselves in the foot a bit by not launching a 128GB iPad option yet.

Yeah, I would totally upgrade is Apple released 128Gb iPad. Hope it happens soon.
 
I do not understand how anyone could use 128GB. It is simply unreasonably large amount of storage space. It is incredibly hard to use 128GB worth of music (assuming one uses them for music and not storing hundreds of apps they don't open), I mean that is just WAY too many songs to choose from, like you would literally never listen to most of them. Generally you listen to certain groups of songs you like, and most of them you never end up playing, like I have so many songs on my 8GB iPod Touch that I literally never play because I just don't feel like listening to them. It's just for those people who want every song they own, no matter how many plays it has on their device (0 being the majority) just because.

"640 K of Ram is enough for anyone."
~Bill Gates
 
All anyone has to do is think to themselves, just WHY is the iPod Classic STILL being made?? A LOT of audiophiles use them for lossless audio portability, a 128GB flash iPod would be great for people like yourself.

As for the apps, totally agree, it's why I think the new Fire HD will sell well against the Nexus 7, it's why I plan to go from 16GB iPhone to 32GB when the new one comes out. Apps eat storage like nothing, especially HD content.

IMO Apple have shot themselves in the foot a bit by not launching a 128GB iPad option yet.

Classic is a silent success, Apple wont mention it's sales but I would be willing to bet the classic,in its 5 yr sameness, is outselling the nano and shuffle. It is ALWAYS the 2nd top selling ipod model on amazon every time I look under mp3 players, same with walmart.
 
The only real complaint I have with my iPT is the camera. Bump it up to the one used in the iPhone 4S and it would be sweet.

Yes, it looks like camera from the very first camera phone.
No "bump up" without a "bump" - the thinness of the iPT and the laws of physics constrains the optical path. If Apple were willing to put out a phoneless iDevice in the case size of the latest phone, with the room they'd have they could do amazing things with photography - i.e., with mirrors, re-direct of the light path, true optical zoom, more light-gathering capacity and more. Plus the entire iPT app library - iCloud, PhotoStream, integration with Twitter and facebook, etc. Which would be lights out for the already fading traditional P&S cams.

Of course they've known that and not done it for years, so maybe they don't see a large enough market opportunity. Still the world's most popular single portable digital device seems small enough to me to be the physical platform for other uses, no??

Samsung (and others?) have already announced (released?) Android "full-sized" P&S cameras - but Sammy's probably the only one with both enough
experience in manufacturing both to really follow this approach. And their relationship between # of models offered/sold and their biz model in relation to to gross/net margins (plus the fact they're a chaebol involved in all kinds of industries) is vastly different from Apple's.

The early Samesong reviews though, are that the first offering's lacking both as an Android device and suffers some defects as a cam as well, e.g., looong delays between shutter press and shoot. So an Apple TouchCam could still rule the space if Apple wanted it to IMHO.

By the same token, the extra space of an iPhone case could also allow a more game-centric model with features just not allowed by the current form factor. Seems unlikely though....

But of course you should listen to me rather than the team running "The World's Most Valuable Company." :rolleyes:
 
after owning an iPhone and being able to stream any podcast or song wherever i am along with any video via the Pogoplug app - the though of going back to an iPod makes me feel "cut off" lol


however, if they came out with a red iPod shuffle, i would get it for running
 
after owning an iPhone and being able to stream any podcast or song wherever i am along with any video via the Pogoplug app - the though of going back to an iPod makes me feel "cut off" lol


however, if they came out with a red iPod shuffle, i would get it for running

As someone who has owned every iPhone since the original, I still prefer the Classic iPod to play in the car and as my all around music player. My 4S rarely gets used as an iPod much anymore. I did buy a 16GB Nano last month and will likely buy a new one as well.
 
Lauded for practically everything it does, Apple utterly failed with the current iPod Nano. Of course, the usual chorus of, 'We Meant Well..' will apply. But for a company having so much industrial-design horsepower, this was an epic fail for these reasons: too small, 'which end is up, anyway?', and no way to track the progress of the selection you're listening to.

Small is nice...to a point. The iPod Nano that this one replaced was actually a better, more friendlier design. You always knew 'which end was up.' I got my current-generation Nano as part of the replacement program Apple offered, so I was 'given' it...I didn't 'choose' it (and then regret it afterward).

I disagree. I think it's functionally better than what it used to be.
 
Streamline the POD line

Apple:

Please kill the iPod Classic with a hard drive & kill the Shuffle too.

Just have the iPod NANO as the intro - econo - sports POD model & have the iPOD Touch as the higher end POD without a phone.

This follows the usual Papa Bear / Mama Bear / Baby Bear lines that you usually have in your other products:

iPhone / iPod Touch / iPod Nano.

Simplify.
 
Apple:

Please kill the iPod Classic with a hard drive & kill the Shuffle too.

Just have the iPod NANO as the intro - econo - sports POD model & have the iPOD Touch as the higher end POD without a phone.

This follows the usual Papa Bear / Mama Bear / Baby Bear lines that you usually have in your other products:

iPhone / iPod Touch / iPod Nano.

Simplify.

Why would you want Apple to kill the Classic if people are still buying it? I bought mine in June and I hear of others buying Classics as well all the time here and on the Apple forums.
 
(first post) personally, I don't think that there is any need to update the current line-up (apart from giving the Ipod touch a 4'' screen). The line up is perfect as it is.
 
Why would you want Apple to kill the Classic if people are still buying it? I bought mine in June and I hear of others buying Classics as well all the time here and on the Apple forums.

I hear a lot of people wanting or thinking things should die because they personally do not have a use for it. I do not use the Classic yet others do and there is nothing wrong with it being in the line up.
 
The Nano is now a wrist watch. Keep it that way.

The Nano is now a wrist watch. That's what people are buying it for. Apple needs to run with that. Keep the Nike stuff. Add some movies and screen savers. Give it Bluetooth to ditch the cable and perhaps make it an iPhone Nano someday. But, keep it a watch.
 
The Nano is now a wrist watch. That's what people are buying it for. Apple needs to run with that. Keep the Nike stuff. Add some movies and screen savers. Give it Bluetooth to ditch the cable and perhaps make it an iPhone Nano someday. But, keep it a watch.

Even though I prefer the fifth generation iPod nano I doubt they want to go back to that size after they have the current generation. Now they do need to refresh the design a bit, if it is selling well for what they are doing they might as well go with it.

They did remove the nice design of the fifth generation along with the video camera and video playback, however I do wonder how much that would be used these days. So many have smart phones or other devices that likely record better and video on such a small screen may not happen all that often. Even with my iPhone video is limited to You Tube or Netflix.

I imagine it does make a cool watch, so without even trying they made the iWatch.
 
Data and GPS

The iPod touch needs GPS and data. Without those there's just NO reason to buy one.

The Nano also needs GPS and bluetooth. The MotoACTV has both and for Apple to compete with other offerings it needs to enter that market with their own incorporated offering. Just a stand alone music player is not going to cut it anymore.
 
Jobs wouldn't let fragmentation get this out of hand with their own products...
 
Watch phone

The Nano is now a wrist watch. That's what people are buying it for. Apple needs to run with that. Keep the Nike stuff. Add some movies and screen savers. Give it Bluetooth to ditch the cable and perhaps make it an iPhone Nano someday. But, keep it a watch.

Exactly-they made a watch without trying -SO TRY and make a great watch with phone capabilities. It can unfold if necessary. Give us emails-weather-texts. Removable bluetooth headset-easy! Will sell many MILLIONS-what are they waiting for?
Having a phone in the pocket or bag is a pain-an extra appendage.
 
Lauded for practically everything it does, Apple utterly failed with the current iPod Nano. Of course, the usual chorus of, 'We Meant Well..' will apply. But for a company having so much industrial-design horsepower, this was an epic fail for these reasons: too small, 'which end is up, anyway?', and no way to track the progress of the selection you're listening to.

Small is nice...to a point. The iPod Nano that this one replaced was actually a better, more friendlier design. You always knew 'which end was up.' I got my current-generation Nano as part of the replacement program Apple offered, so I was 'given' it...I didn't 'choose' it (and then regret it afterward).

You do realize there is way to show the progress of what you are listening to? It has a progress bar just like any other iPod and you can drag the bar to any point to move forward or back.
 
An iPod Touch that costs the same as a brand new iPad 2.

I'm a bit baffled, to be honest.
 
make new shuffle be current nano

The current nano basically has a feature set closer to the shuffle... can't play movies, optimized for "active" life styles, limited storage etc.
The touch on it is pretty limited, and IMHO was a step down from the previous generation's nano ( no more movies, smaller screen etc )

It would seem to me that bringing back the candybar nano as has been rumored is a very logical step, but the current nano is nice... why not keep it aive but making it the new shuffle?
 
iPad Mini vs iPod Touch

I was actually wondering that myself. Something tells me the iPad Mini is the "new iPod Touch"...

Its the New iPod Touch Venti!

----------

Kill the iPod Shuffle.
Kill The iPod Classic with hard drive.
Smaller "iPad" to New iPod Touch WiFi / Bluetooth / Game Center Pad.

iPod Touch X
iPod Touch (discounted)
iPod Nano
 
the ipod touch needs to be updated to at least 512MB of ram or more otherwise Im not buying one :rolleyes:
 
Wow I miss the time when we were super excited with an annual new iPod announcement, whether it be a Shuffle, Mini, Nano or just regular iPod. The emphasis on the products is strong and everyone was excited.

I am still very excited to this day, but kinda sad most people and even Apple don't care anymore as it is taking a back seat to the rest of the announcements (iPhone, iPad etc)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.