The FT notes that Apple is intentionally not launching an on-demand service like Spotify in order to avoid cannibalizing purchases from its iTunes Music Store. Instead, the iRadio service will allow customers to discover new music and likely direct listeners to the iTunes Store to buy music they enjoy.
In short, wouldn't this be aggregating music, which pretty much goes against the very policy Apple adopted to crack down on apps like AppGratis, Appshopper, etc.?
iTunes Match isn't now, and launched in the US only.
You only need to invest about 5 minutes to know what iRadio is going to offer. .
I agree no doubt Apple thought they could waltz in there and demand their price.
iRadio is going to be about as successful as... Ping.
I hope iRadio is decent so I can dump the flaming hunk of crap that spotify is turning into. I loved spotify, but they've literally taken their great piece of software and have made it worse with every iteration, both in design and performance. There are threads hundreds of pages long on their user forums, but they just don't care. So as soon as iRadio proves it works and has a good amount of stuff, I'm out and taking my dollars with me.
I'm with you. A better Pandora doesn't seem like much of a "next big thing". I don't get how "Apple needs this" and similar. I'm sure it will be nice and probably have a few benefits Pandora has missed. On the other hand, I'm sure it will have some "why'd they do that?" lock-down that Pandora doesn't match.
But I can't think of anything here that could be "revolutionary." It's like we're chasing a fading medium of music distribution in hopes of reviving it. Maybe after this rolls out, Apple can go into the VHS tape rental business. That was hot 10+ years ago and, with the Apple spin, maybe they can turn it into something too.
Similarly, I read that bit about the ad revenues and I wonder why people are going to want to both (potentially) pay something for this service AND listen to ads rather than just play the playlists of music they like on their iDevices for free. Yes, there's something to be said for discovering new music but we already have Pandora and Spotify for that. Is the convenience of one-click purchasing really all that? If so, we're excited to pay for something with ads so that we can easily pay for something else when we hear a song we like. Pay for the opportunity to conveniently pay more. That's innovation!
Could we use LTE to download all of this music we're paying to get to pay for so that we can burn through our data allocation even faster? That way we can pay for the convenience of getting to pay for songs and getting to pay AT&T, Verizon, etc even more because this is yet another "innovation" that seems to revolve around burning through hard-capped data as quickly as possible. Win for Apple. Win for AT&T, Verizon, etc. Win for Music Studios.
Anyone noticing a trend in iDevice innovation over the last couple of years? What does SIRI, Maps, and probably this iRadio all have in common? Hint: think about data burn vs. hard caps set by AT&T, Verizon, etc. Has Apple iDevice innovation pretty much moved to a filter involving what else could be developed to burn through capped data even more quickly?
Spotify is not established in all markets, Spotify and Pandora are not available in Canada for example and I am sure a few other markets.
So I would be interested in seeing what Apple has to offer.
In my part of the world there is no Pandora or Spotify and also no data caps. The US is no doubt a very important market, but not the only market.
You only need to invest about 5 minutes to know what iRadio is going to offer. Certainly not a Spotify-like replacement.
Also, Apple doesn´t offer every service worldwide, so your other point is moot.
Apple already has streaming music via iTunes Match if you don't have music stored on the phone.
I don't think it will be available in all markets in the beginning but iTunes match was available in other markets fairly quickly so hoping it would progress quickly.
I guess the point I am getting at is when I see comments like. "that is what Spotify" is for or "how is this going to be better than Pandora", "Apple is wasting their time" etc, etc. Well people the world is a big place and their are potential markets not served by the more popular streaming services, so there are some people interested in Apple's offering and Apple probably is looking at the big picture as well trying to look at potential revenue sources.
Anyways enough of my rant!!
----------
How do you know what Apple is offering? Your point is moot by thinking you know what Apple is bringing to the table.
I've never used pandora or spotify so am not up on this tech, but iRadio seems kinda underwhelming if its just a radio station(s).
I believe it's the first time "i miss Steve".
With the Pandora-like agreement Apple is doing exactly what a Microsfot would do: go where the money is, not where it will be.
Consumers want to have Spotify-like service, and in the end the consumer always win. If Apple doesn't do it, someone else will.
We had complete albums, then iTunes revolutionized the industry with the capability of purchasing single tracks, now Spotify and the likes revolutionize it again with their service, wich is plain better (for 90% of consumers) than purchasing music in iTunes.
I'm not using iTunes since one year, and so is any of my friends who had a chance to try Spotify. They couldn't believe it costed 10$ per month, just as i couldn't believe a song could cost 1$.
Apple should go where the consumers want to be lead, and do it better than competitors. It pays in the long run. The right thing to do is to satisfy and surprise consumers, not one-year forecast of share value.
Why on earth should i ever purchase a song that i listened from "iRadio" for 10% of what i pay to Spotify monthly to listen to it wherever i want whenever i want on whicherever device i want, all perfectly synced, is beyond my mind. And boy, yes i'm an Apple fan.
Trying to go against the tide, against what is better for consumer, might be good for iTunes sales for the next 2 years, but plainly wrong in the long run.
Purchase spotify, integrate it with your ecosystem, make it better rename it and re-invent the music industry again.
As a college student, I agree with you completely.
Something weird I've found: I listen to a lot of music on Spotify on a free plan, and about once a week I find a song I like so much that I buy it on the iOS music store just so I can listen to it on my iPhone. So Spotify basically is doing all the work of convincing me to buy the song, but then Apple is the one collecting the money when I decide to buy it.
My habit is different from yours. I get Spotify Premium and get all the songs I need, since its cross platform and works on all my devices![]()
all apple needs to do is register a patent for one of the notes. problem solved
I think Spotify (or other services alike) are the future. Still, I do see why Apple won't cannabalize the iTunes store.
I dont support any streaming services because I wont accept any DRM measures and am not willing to spend more on data services at additional cost on top of the service price to keep other's richer, just to hear music. If I'm paying for music I will only accept tangible copies of music. All this so-called "convenience" is way too costly.
It's like we're chasing a fading medium of music distribution in hopes of reviving it. Maybe after this rolls out, Apple can go into the VHS tape rental business. That was hot 10+ years ago and, with the Apple spin, maybe they can turn it into something too.
My friend, you said it all. I'm really not sure what Apple even hopes to offer that a half dozen streaming programs don't already do.
And I'm not sure at all what "won't cannibalize iTunes" even means for iRadio. Are they going to limit functionality so you will be inclined to go to iTunes and buy? If they limit functionality, the only thing you'll be inclined to do is fire up Spotify.
Same here.I've no objections to iRadio but I would much rather see Apple put their efforts into providing the option to buy HQ lossless tracks in either 16bit or 24bit. If they offered HQ lossless tracks I would switch back to iTunes and stop buying CDs altogether.
Very good post, I agree wholeheartedly.I believe it's the first time "i miss Steve".
With the Pandora-like agreement Apple is doing exactly what a Microsfot would do: go where the money is, not where it will be.
Consumers want to have Spotify-like service, and in the end the consumer always win. If Apple doesn't do it, someone else will.
We had complete albums, then iTunes revolutionized the industry with the capability of purchasing single tracks, now Spotify and the likes revolutionize it again with their service, wich is plain better (for 90% of consumers) than purchasing music in iTunes.
I'm not using iTunes since one year, and so is any of my friends who had a chance to try Spotify. They couldn't believe it costed 10$ per month, just as i couldn't believe a song could cost 1$.
Apple should go where the consumers want to be lead, and do it better than competitors. It pays in the long run. The right thing to do is to satisfy and surprise consumers, not one-year forecast of share value.
Why on earth should i ever purchase a song that i listened from "iRadio" for 10% of what i pay to Spotify monthly to listen to it wherever i want whenever i want on whicherever device i want, all perfectly synced, is beyond my mind. And boy, yes i'm an Apple fan.
Trying to go against the tide, against what is better for consumer, might be good for iTunes sales for the next 2 years, but plainly wrong in the long run.
Purchase spotify, integrate it with your ecosystem, make it better rename it and re-invent the music industry again.
And you think that Apple is different than Spotify and Pandora? Apple´s track record isn´t necessarily the best when it comes to release some if it´s services worldwide. There´s always at least a significant delay involved (cause of re-negogiations in other countries, because you have new rights holders). If you´re in an insignificant market for Apple to make money, they are not going to offer it to you.Also, there are enough smart people at apple to realise that an easy way for this to be a success is to be first to market. They cant turn back the clock and get in before the leaders in the US, but they can beat them in other big markets. I live in a country where Pandora and Spotify are not available, so what they can offer doesnt matter to me.