Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I hope they release 2 sizes, i'm done with 27 inch. its too small for my needs and dont need two such displays.
TBH, the form factor of a single rectangular screen is pretty old-fashioned anyway. I have a 16"/4k thing attached to the bottom of mine with magnetic hinges for a vital second screen. I'd use the lovely screen of my 14" MBP, but someone stuck a massive keyboard to it that you can't even fold out of the way, so that's destined to be hidden under my desk, sadly.

What I'd REALLY like is, say, a 27" in the middle, with thin, angled monitors down each side (like 16" at 90º), and a fourth underneath, same width as the 27, but way shorter, angled upwards. Like the barn doors of a studio light but without the top.
 
And there are still very few 5k monitors that can compete with the ASD. That's likely part of the reason Apple sees no need to rush on an ASD 2.
Compete on what? Having a resolution of 5120 x 2880 pixels specifically? Sure, but that has more to do with the fact that that's just a very niche resolution that just happens to be needed to solve a problem only macOS has (not to mention that panels with that size are starting to appear anyways).

Meanwhile in pretty much every other aspect where one can claim objectively that other panels are better, be it PPI, color accuracy, brightness, price, etc. the Studio Display was already being leapfrogged before it launched. Never mind now. On more subjective aspects (e.g. size, aspect ratio, radius), well... it never could compete at all in the first place.
 
[sarcasm]
PLEASE give us a notch! Also, please give us rounded corners on the screen in order to look like decades-old CRT TVs, but only give us those rounded corners on the top of the screen while maintaining modern 90-degree corners on the bottom of the screen, so the screen can look asymmetric, just like on the current MacBook line. Tim Cook is so wonderful and everthing he does is right!
[/sarcasm]
 
I looked into it, and even though Apple displays have multiple inputs, you need an external adapter to use a PC. Apple displays have no built in controls from what I can tell so no way to switch inputs hence external boxes are required. I have never owned though one so if someone knows better please correct me.
The current Studio Display only has a single Thunderbolt/USB-C input. To use with a PC, you have to have a Thunderbolt KVM (only one exists to my knowledge and has issues) and your PC has to have Thunderbolt or USB-C display output (which excludes most desktop PCs with add-in graphics cards).

I ended up getting an Asus Pro-Art that has USB-C, DisplayPort, and HDMI to support my Mac, my Windows desktop, and my work laptop dock. I'd happily given Apple money for a Studio Display if only it had multiple inputs (and preferably some sort of compatibility with Windows, either software or hardware buttons).
 
Clearly, you are an Android user:

The iPhone was released in 2007. It’s blatantly obvious I was referring to new products.
 
Compete on what? Having a resolution of 5120 x 2880 pixels specifically? Sure, but that has more to do with the fact that that's just a very niche resolution that just happens to be needed to solve a problem only macOS has (not to mention that panels with that size are starting to appear anyways).

Meanwhile in pretty much every other aspect where one can claim objectively that other panels are better, be it PPI, color accuracy, brightness, price, etc. the Studio Display was already being leapfrogged before it launched. Never mind now. On more subjective aspects (e.g. size, aspect ratio, radius), well... it never could compete at all in the first place.
On panel quality, on build quality, on speakers quality, on seamless integration with Mac OS, on having options between glossy and matte screen. From what I can see, only BENQ one is the closest (but still far away from being equal)
 
I would be happy if Apple sold the XDR for $2.5k including a stand and nano option. At this point since they "don't care", why not cut the price, move units and make profits? We all know the premium price for these are huge and cutting it in half would still be profitable.
 
The current Studio Display only has a single Thunderbolt/USB-C input. To use with a PC, you have to have a Thunderbolt KVM (only one exists to my knowledge and has issues) and your PC has to have Thunderbolt or USB-C display output (which excludes most desktop PCs with add-in graphics cards).

I ended up getting an Asus Pro-Art that has USB-C, DisplayPort, and HDMI to support my Mac, my Windows desktop, and my work laptop dock. I'd happily given Apple money for a Studio Display if only it had multiple inputs (and preferably some sort of compatibility with Windows, either software or hardware buttons).

But surely you can plug a device in the different USB C ports? Or does it have to be a Thunderbolt port? I cannot get with my monitor as it only has 1 USB C / Thunderbolt port, HDMI port and Display Port.
But otherwise yes, it is pretty crap to be honest to charge 1500 for a monitor, let alone the Pro Display XDR at 4500, and only allow one device to plug into it with using an external box.
 
Here’s what imma need outta the Studio Display 2:
1) Daisy Chain two studio displays together
2) A secondary input to use with a PC.

Thanks for attending my TedTalk.
I agree with second point. I connect and disconnect my Mac/Windows laptop at least once a day. Not sure USB connectors are designed for that…

Also I would add:
3. Compatibility with Windows brightness interface.

Having to boot up your Mac and connect it to the display just to adjust the brightness throughout the day is stupid.
 
The last of those was the iPad, in 2010.
IMG_5972.jpeg


Not exactly…
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: 8ght and hg.wells
- Webcam. Apple sell nearly a BILLION (4 on each pro phone remember) tiny, high quality camera modules EVERY YEAR, and yet put something from a 2008 child's toy in their premium, high-end monitor that their customers use every day for vital work calls. It's not poor... it's pathetic, and an enormous error that I trust saw heads roll. Without this being fixed, there's no way I'd consider upgrading. It should be the quality of the best an iPhone can manage, no excuses.
One speculative rationale put forth in a review was that some image quality loss may have been a necessary compromise at the time in order to achieve the Center Stage functionality. If that's the case, a few questions then present themselves:

1.) Would that be the case with one designed recently?
2.) Would the majority of the customer base prefer to nix Center Stage to gain substantially higher image quality?
3.) Could Center Stage be turned on and off so the end user could choose between it and higher image quality?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mongerman
Compete on what? Having a resolution of 5120 x 2880 pixels specifically? Sure, but that has more to do with the fact that that's just a very niche resolution that just happens to be needed to solve a problem only macOS has (not to mention that panels with that size are starting to appear anyways).

Meanwhile in pretty much every other aspect where one can claim objectively that other panels are better, be it PPI, color accuracy, brightness, price, etc. the Studio Display was already being leapfrogged before it launched. Never mind now. On more subjective aspects (e.g. size, aspect ratio, radius), well... it never could compete at all in the first place.

I find color accuracy on my ASD to be far far superior to every other display I've tried in the past (LG, Samsung, ViewSonic, etc - all with a calibrator).

Once set up (an easy task selecting a color profile), have never needed to touch it again, after printing a ton of image files in Lightroom over two+ years with prints coming out exactly like what I see on the display. I've never had to reprint an image. With my ASD there's been zero drift for both color and brightness over two+ years of frequent image processing and printing.
 
Seriously though about the lack of even secondary input.

It is the only thing that gives me pause about dropping the money. I want to be able to plug in another machine like a steam deck.

Built in AppleTV would also have been killer for the years that I was mostly working out of my bedroom as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UnbreakableAlex
But surely you can plug a device in the different USB C ports? Or does it have to be a Thunderbolt port? I cannot get with my monitor as it only has 1 USB C / Thunderbolt port, HDMI port and Display Port.
But otherwise yes, it is pretty crap to be honest to charge 1500 for a monitor, let alone the Pro Display XDR at 4500, and only allow one device to plug into it with using an external box.
The Studio Display has 4 ports on it, a single input and 3 downstream ports. To use it with more than one computer, you need a very expensive thunderbolt KVM or just manually swap cables.

And yes, the multiple inputs and ability to have basic usage/control with a non-Mac is a deal-breaker for a great many people. Many more people would buy this monitor, and likely even people without a Mac, than people who would buy a Mac specifically to use this monitor. Even people completely in the Apple ecosystem could use a second input, those with a desktop Mac and would like to dock their Macbook.
 
The Studio Display has 4 ports on it, a single input and 3 downstream ports. To use it with more than one computer, you need a very expensive thunderbolt KVM or just manually swap cables.

And yes, the multiple inputs and ability to have basic usage/control with a non-Mac is a deal-breaker for a great many people. Many more people would buy this monitor, and likely even people without a Mac, than people who would buy a Mac specifically to use this monitor. Even people completely in the Apple ecosystem could use a second input, those with a desktop Mac and would like to dock their Macbook.
I think there's a big difference it marketing aims worth noting here. Let's compare Apple to Dell.

Dell makes an extensive line of displays which they are happy to sell you whether you want it for a PC, Mac, Linux-based PC or gaming console. And if you are a PC user, they're happy to sell you a Dell Display whether your Windows PC is a Dell brand PC or one of the myriad other brands. Dell doesn't visibly care; they want to sell a Dell display to anybody willing to buy one. Yes, they sell Windows PCs and would probably like it if you also bought a Dell PC, but I see no pressure to do so.

Apple is very unlike that. When they produce a peripheral, it seems like it's only made for an Apple ecosystem product, ignoring the rest of the computing world. The ASD was a Thunderbolt 3 input-only display with no external controls at a time that bound it tightly to Macs. We don't see Apple Pencils (Pro or otherwise) used on Android tablets. Apple Bluetooth keyboards can be using with non-Apple devices, but they don't have the functionality to remember 3 different devices and switch amongst them with a button push.

Of course, some people have more than one Mac, and at least 2, if not 3, inputs would be useful for many, and Apple ought not feel threatened by console makers, but still, the tendency to have Apple products nudge people toward the 'walled garden' Apple product ecosystem, coupled with their strongly minimalist industrial design heritage (e.g.: fewer ports on MacBooks), leads me to think they may not expand input options on the next gen. ASD.

From the user perspective, it'd be nice to have extra inputs, so you could more easily get maximum use out of your very expensive Apple display.

It's like Dell wants to sell you a peripheral and Apple wants to sell you a platform. While Dell would happily sell you a complete computer system, you can buy a Dell display for a non-Dell system and not feel like you're missing out; with Apple, if you want the maximum experience, it needs to be an Apple ecosystem experience.

Interesting question...if the ASD came with added HDMI and DisplayPort ports, how many more would've been sold? Would the PC crowd have bought a bunch? Console gamers would skip due to 60-Hz refresh rate.
 
There's lots of talk of "expensive TB KVMs" and "TB only", but doesn't the ASD support DisplayPort alt-mode over USB-C just fine?
 
Compete on what? Having a resolution of 5120 x 2880 pixels specifically? Sure, but that has more to do with the fact that that's just a very niche resolution that just happens to be needed to solve a problem only macOS has (not to mention that panels with that size are starting to appear anyways).

Meanwhile in pretty much every other aspect where one can claim objectively that other panels are better, be it PPI, color accuracy, brightness, price, etc. the Studio Display was already being leapfrogged before it launched. Never mind now. On more subjective aspects (e.g. size, aspect ratio, radius), well... it never could compete at all in the first place.
5k and color accuracy are baseline features for me, and I assume for many ASD buyers. If 1440 resolution was good enough for me, I wouldn't own an ASD. I have an LG 4 right next to my ASD and the picture is noticeably not as good.

It has taken years to have any real competition in the 5k monitor space, and even now there aren't a lot of options.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drrich2
I find color accuracy on my ASD to be far far superior to every other display I've tried in the past (LG, Samsung, ViewSonic, etc - all with a calibrator).

Once set up (an easy task selecting a color profile), have never needed to touch it again, after printing a ton of image files in Lightroom over two+ years with prints coming out exactly like what I see on the display. I've never had to reprint an image. With my ASD there's been zero drift for both color and brightness over two+ years of frequent image processing and printing.
I use Capture One and Image Print to control my printer, what I see on my ASD is exactly what my prints look like. I would like more real estate because those are two different programs and I usually have both open. I have been watching for an upgrade for over a year, this was the first signs of life. 6K would be good 8K would be better, it needs to be cheaper to purchase otherwise I’ll get a used one for a song.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.