The sad thing is, LG makes nicer looking monitors without branding, such as 32UL950-W (ugly stand notwithstanding, which can thankfully be removed):Ugly without Apple branding. Just looks cheap.

The sad thing is, LG makes nicer looking monitors without branding, such as 32UL950-W (ugly stand notwithstanding, which can thankfully be removed):Ugly without Apple branding. Just looks cheap.
No, it’s a smartphone with a very small screen.Only 24 inches? Is it a watch?
Side note - if you're going the desktop route, why buy such a tiny display? Unless desk space is REALLY cramped...
Imho, even my 27" 5K iMac feels quite small to me nowadays (I'd upgrade to 34-38" ~6-8K iMac in a heartbeat).
It does not. USB-C onlyI don't think the original LG 4k display has thunderbolt, since it can be used with the ipad pro.
Don't like it either, display is mostly not the problem, the stand is.
Be vewy vewy quiet, we'we cawwying ewG 23.7-Inch UwtwaFine Dispways.
Side note - if you're going the desktop route, why buy such a tiny display? Unless desk space is REALLY cramped...
Imho, even my 27" 5K iMac feels quite small to me nowadays (I'd upgrade to 34-38" ~6-8K iMac in a heartbeat).
Sounds like a 30” 5K display is in the works (to expand the 27” by 10%, same as the 23.7” compared to the current 21.5”).
This would imply that new iMacs with the same screens will appear soon.
Do you actually mean, "Ugly, and without Apple branding. Just looks cheap.", or do you really mean the sentence exactly as typed?Ugly without Apple branding. Just looks cheap.
Oh good. So if the gpu in the monitor fails, the whole thing is trash.
Ugly without Apple branding. Just looks cheap.
I don't think the original LG 4k display has thunderbolt, since it can be used with the ipad pro.
There are no 24" and 30" iMacs that are going to appear soon. Apple just refreshed the iMacs and that is what we are going to have going forward for quite a while.
"Just too small in todays world". Listen to that. Would you like a 50" TV on your desk?
Apple's 21.5" displays actually have higher resolution than any other 4K display in the market.
And exactly what computer am I supposed to plug this monitor into? The Mac Pro is over 3 years old and the Mac Mini won't exactly drive this monitor properly?
And exactly what computer am I supposed to plug this monitor into? The Mac Pro is over 3 years old and the Mac Mini won't exactly drive this monitor properly?
All existing eGPU solutions come ASFAIK in the form of boxes with PCIe slots, ie, the graphic card can be easily switched out. My initial thoughts on monitors with eGPU capability was that that would most likely apply there as well.Oh good. So if the gpu in the monitor fails, the whole thing is trash.
Can I connect it with my MacPro (Late 2013) by using an additional TB2 to TB3 adapter?
That’s one incredibly expensive small monitor!! Not worth it IMO, better screens out there for less. But I guess as it’s endorsed by Apple the price must double eh?
Side note - if you're going the desktop route, why buy such a tiny display? Unless desk space is REALLY cramped...
Imho, even my 27" 5K iMac feels quite small to me nowadays (I'd upgrade to 34-38" ~6-8K iMac in a heartbeat).
And exactly what computer am I supposed to plug this monitor into? The Mac Pro is over 3 years old and the Mac Mini won't exactly drive this monitor properly?
I guess you are forgetting the iMac 20"/24" of Early 2009, introduced March 3rd, 2009, that were followed by the iMac 21.5"/27" of Late 2009 on October 20th, 2009. Apple simply did a spec bump. To imply that because they just spec bumped the current design they won't introduce a new one, is simply misinformed.