Some people are taking the “iPhone on four wheels” comment too literally. In a fundamental sense he is correct. Cars are becoming basically computers on wheels. Obviously there will be a lot more to it than that. But I think in many ways tech companies are better suited to build the cars of tomorrow than most existing car companies are.
Man if that isn’t exactly what they were saying for iphone rumors…”Apple smartphones will never catch up to the competition”….
sure thing you can do it Foxconn ... when I know which car you actually manufacture, I will put it on my "do not buy" list ...
I wonder when "they" said that, and who "they" was... considering that iPhones blew everyone away the moment the product was unveiled.Man if that isn’t exactly what they were saying for iphone rumors…”Apple smartphones will never catch up to the competition”….
I wonder when "they" said that, and who "they" was... considering that iPhones blew everyone away the moment the product was unveiled.
I really have no idea what Apple wants to bring to the table especially when they are nowhere near a release. 2027? By then most of the big players will be miles away and I doubt Apple can catch up. Companies can't even keep up with Tesla so apart from fancy design and maybe interesting software I don't see Apple bringing anything awesome.
I think they should have started ages ago and by now they should be close to EVT or something.
6 years away? Well, I don't see it. Tesla will be owning most of the important market share that Apple is going for.
Eh, Tesla's days are numbered. Specifically, I'm not seeing where they fit the auto industry once the rest of the pack starts delivering their own EVs - which is already starting. Within the next 10 years, most are targetting all-electric fleets. At that point, I'm unsure the differentiator Tesla could offer. Price? Not if an electric Honda Civic has anything to say about it. Luxury? Pretty sure the BMWs and Mercedes of the world would be pretty vocal. Performance? Not if Porche has their way. Right now, Tesla is at the tail end of the luxery that was "the only game in town." And while they deserve high fives for kick-starting the EV revoluition, I just can't help but think they will fade into the ether. Time will tell.
So where the heck does Apple fit in? As OSes become more prevalant, they have a direct interest in exploring those potential landscapes that will likely (and are) differ wildly from the computer-only days (it wasn't just yiPhones that saw them drop "Computer" form their name). I know many on these forums pine for the good ol' days when Aple just made cimpoters, but as lifelong user, supporter adn investor, it is imperative Apple continues to explore other avenues. If said exporation can make them a few bucks along the way, mor power to them. But the end goal is relevance in an ever-changing landscape. This will require courage (a word many here are fond of jabbing), grit, relentless curisoity and tireless persuit to travel paths unkown. With the car, they seem to be taking a similar approach as they did with the iPhone. Back in 2005, they partnered with Moltorola to offer the first phone with iTunes. The Motorola ROCKr was their Trojan Horse. The experience leading up to the ROCKr launch enabled them to take their always intended next step: launching their own handheld 2 years later. It seems CarPlay is serving a similar function, with most automakers playing the role of the ROCKr. As pohones started pairign with cars, the sheer volume of iPhoen users forced CarPlay into existence. Forced automakers to yield. Some tried their own infotainment systems. But none were the experince so many had coem to expect, iOS. So Apple launchign a car isn't as far-fetched as it might seem. Teh onyl thing I do know is that it will be interesteign to see how this allplays out. Should be fun, if you let it.
Lol. Tesla fanboi detected. Their cars are pure trash. Sure, they're pretty quick but honestly speaking very few people in the $100K+ luxury car segment care about extra .3s in 0-60 acceleration. And aside from acceleration Tesla doesn't hold a candle to BMW/Audi/Benz/Porsche. Tesla's interior is ugly, it's very cheaply made, that yoke is a sick joke and the whole thing just reeks of major cost cutting everywhere. On a $140K car. I won't even mention quality because we both know these cars are not in the same league. I've driven the previous version of Plaid - the P100D and I was shocked how absolutely awful it was for the money at the time minus acceleration. Honestly, BMW 3-series people could've been condescending towards that interior, build quality, ergonomics, etc, all at 1/3 of the price.Porsche you mentioned? Sure, their EV is nice but thats it. Its just 'nice' whereas look at the new S. Other EV makers can only dream of these specs.
Tesla has huge charging network, their battery tech is years ahead especially when they get the new tech out (this year?). Mercedes? They have nothing - all these luxury brands have just that now - their name and legacy that is going to be obsolete unless they start to seriously do something inventive.
Not sure what world you live in but yearly sales of iPhone are funny compared to yearly sales of all Android phones. So iPhone is far from the top and hasn't been on it for a while. No add a specific new feature coming to the next iOS (you know I'm talking about), I bet their sales will suffer even more.Its like the iPhone introduction - even now that everyone copies Apple's iPhone no one is able to remove it from the top spot and I assume that will be the same for Tesla.
Sorry to tell you but you're very very delusional on both. New players will bury Tesla and I sincerely hope that happens. If Tesla went down I'd be the first one to dance on their grave.Apple - best smartphone
Tesla - best EV cars
Thats just how its going to be for the next 10 years or so. After that we can reevaluate.