China could be an existential risk to TSMC if they don’t expand to other regions.I wonder if this is a way for TSMC to bypass tariffs and Trump's wrath in general. Maybe get an exception to the tariffs or something. Otherwise, I see no point in TSMC doing this.
This would be soccialism, where the government owns the means of production. Communism is where the means are commonly owned by “everyone”.ouch... how the mighty have fallen.
isn't that communism? (according to republicans)
Of course China is a threat to Taiwan but TSMC can build their own fabs in the US. No need to buy Intel's defunct plants and then retool everything anyways. I think it's much deeper than just TSMC looking to diversify out of Taiwan quickly. The US government is probably putting pressure on TSMC to bail out Intel or it's tariff related.China could be an existential risk to TSMC if they don’t expand to other regions.
It’s a lifeline, for sure. Just last year they were discussing if they should move towards simply being a manufacturer Ang getting out of the design business, but now they are desperate and looking to reinvent themselves.It’s sad to see Intel, which was once the world leader in semiconductors, fall this far. But if they don’t do this deal, they could shrink even more, or disappear entirely, resulting in many more layoffs.
Nah more like 3999🤣 I just hope we don’t have to pay $1999 for the iPhone 17 Ultra due to something that happened yesterday.
I wonder if they’re going to help Intel catch up a bit and let them take over some of the larger node sizes they want to get out of so they can sell off older machines and make retooling cheaper for more advanced nodes they’re working on. They produce tons of chips for the auto, smartphones, cpus and graphics cards, and basically everything in between. Maybe they wanna get out of the older nodes. TSMC has been #1 for a while now because they don’t stop researching and let other catch up and apple buying cutting edge nodes lets them learn to improve yields and performance by essentially selling a process in beta and not creating huge piles of chips they can’t sell because it’s not part of an order. At least that’s my understanding. Either that or trump said he’d give them a waiver if they helped.I don’t see the logic here for TSMC. Why help your main competitor unless they are planning a future merger.
Be prepared to lose that money because if their processor development doesn’t improve, it doesn’t matter what their fab doesOn the hopes this news is legit and comes to fruition... I'm buying around 3 shares of Intel ASAP. Already have 1 share of TSMC. Always invest long term... wish I'd offered $21/share, instead of $20/share last night... I'd have my 1 share of Intel now. Couldn't figure out what made it shoot UP a dollar or two, when everyone else I track (Apple, ARM, TSMC, etc.) was trading sideways today, for the most part). I cancelled my Intel order and bought 5 shares of OXLC instead. Now I'm kinda wishing I hadn't. Oh well... that's the stock market for ya!
🤣 I just hope we don’t have to pay $1999 for the iPhone 17 Ultra due to something that happened yesterday.
I wonder how they'd feel if instead of pitching it as "we need them" it was instead pitched as "we don't want China to have them". So instead of suggesting Americans are insufficient, you suggest we're just denying China to have a chance to compete.
If job security is the concern, I think it's a lot better if those people are in the US than outside... because international companies are going to consider hiring them either way, and their CoL is much higher and so they're a lot less competitive on a talent per dollar basis if they're in the US instead of many of those countries with a lower CoL.
The Future is ARM and it’s reduced Instruction Set, not x86 so this is understandable. I still use an Intel Mac, so I have soft spot for Intel
Been hearing this since the 80s.The Future is ARM and it’s reduced Instruction Set, not x86 so this is understandable. I still use an Intel Mac, so I have soft spot for Intel
Competitor? Intel’s foundry half is basically a corpse in freefall, and TSMC is just going to wear them as a skin for that “American-made” designation and some hedging against their headquarters being flattened by the PLA. As the article points out, bringing in their proven equipment, processes, and practices is likely easier than trying to salvage Intel’s.I don’t see the logic here for TSMC. Why help your main competitor unless they are planning a future merger.
Could the US Government somehow buy TSMC? Maybe loan enough money to Intel that Intel buys TSMC with it? Is there any precedence to the US Government being worried about a whole company involved with national security being taken over by a rival country?
Samsung makes DRAM, NAND, their own CPUs, they’re #3 chipmaker if not #2
tsmc will eventually buy out INTEL...they'll take over the factories and thats that...
Apple supplier TSMC has reached a preliminary agreement with Intel that will see TSMC operating Intel’s chipmaking facilities, reports The Information. TSMC will own a 20 percent stake in the new combined company, while Intel and other semiconductor companies will own the majority of the shares.
![]()
As part of the deal, TSMC may share some of its chip manufacturing methods with Intel, and train Intel employees to use them. Discussions are still underway, and the final details have not been established. The talks between Intel and TSMC were reportedly initiated by the Trump administration in an effort to stymy Intel’s decline and bring advanced chipmaking to the U.S.
Intel is one of TSMC’s major competitors, and the two have long been rivals. Apple previously used Intel chips in its Macs, but transitioned to its own Apple silicon chips manufactured by TSMC starting in 2020. No Apple devices use Intel processors, with Apple now relying entirely on its own technology.
TSMC focuses on chip manufacturing, not design, which is handled by TSMC customers like Apple and Nvidia. The focus solely on manufacturing has allowed TSMC to outpace Intel, and Intel’s foundary operations are less attractive to companies because Intel’s chips cost more than TSMC’s and its yields are lower.
Some Intel executives are said to be worried that the deal would result in layoffs, because Intel would need to eliminate engineers and may need to change or sell the equipment that it uses. Intel and TSMC have different manufacturing machines and materials, so if Intel is expected to adopt TSMC manufacturing processes, it could have to sell most of its existing equipment.
In 2024, Intel had an $18.8 billion loss because of its investments in chip manufacturing and a weakening PC market.
Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.
Article Link: Apple Supplier TSMC May Operate Intel’s Chipmaking Facilities
Been hearing what?Been hearing this since the 80s.
So fraking boring.
"The future is ARM" You didn't check what you wrote?Been hearing what?