Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Since modern Macs are not user upgradable (even Mac Pro is limited to just the PCIe-based expansion), your argument isn't wrong.

However, I generally offer the following recommendations for my friends and families.
  1. If you have the extra budget, step up to 512 GB storage before upgrading the memory. The exception is for very casual users that rarely stores anything locally. Even if your Mac can easily accommodate external storage (e.g., Mac Mini and Mac Studio), not everything can be easily stored on external storage, such as applications and iCloud-based documents. 512 GB is also significantly faster as it uses two NVMe storage modules. This is particularly beneficial when you have 8 GB RAM.
  2. Even if you think you can get by with 8 GB RAM, if you tend to have many dozen browsers tabs, run several applications, or intend to use external display and MacBook's display at the same time, consider getting 16 GB RAM. Mac's GPU cores will borrow up to 5.5 GB from the system RAM for video use, although typically, the amount borrowed will be under 2 GB. Still, that leaves only about 6 GB for RAM. That can be taxing with many browser tabs and applications. New features like widgets may also use significant amount of RAM.
My guess is your recommendations are older boilerplate and it is time to update. H2 of 2023 any new box should expect a life cycle through 2028-2029 and beyond, and Apple has been making 96 GB available even in laptops for months now. Recommending in terms of 16 GB RAM is recommending 1/6 of what Apple makes available in laptops, today; IMO bad advice for what OS/apps will like to see in 2026, let alone in 2029. Eight GB would be 1/12 of what Apple makes available in laptops today.

Intentionally driving boxes into swap to SSD is bad planning. A) It is intentionally constraining otherwise great engineering and B) it wears SSDs unnecessarily. Dealing with a dead boot drive truly sucks and should be avoided, even if one has (unlikely) perfect backup.

Apple's new Unified Memory Architecture (UMA) baking RAM on-chip in close proximity to the CPU truly rocks. We should expect OS/apps to take more and more advantage of UMA as time goes on, i.e. more demands to RAM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: El Szomorito
If M3 is indeed released this year and based on 3nm, will it also be based on A17? Prior M-series cores have been based on A-series cores released at least 1 year prior.
I would think so, or think there's a chance, based on the premise that architecture (context: generational, not ISA) nowadays needs to be designed for the node it is intended to be manufactured on, implementing more guard-rails in the design the smaller the printing has to go.

A16 is designed for "4nm", seemingly closely related to TSMC's 5nm, while 3nm is a bit of a new era that likely requires them the re-think many steps. It doesn't make sense to me why they would have invested R&D transitioning the design of the A16 to 3nm when the finishing of A17 seemingly lines up pretty well.

But, casual onlooker here. Guess we'll see. Maybe chips of M3 size still don't make economical sense on the N3B-node (which from all we hear is expensive as * and riddled with issues) and the M3 has actually been a "4nm" A16 derivative all along. A hillarious nerd-community meltdown if that was the case!
 
Seems to me the M3 is really about the battery.... Everything I've read about performance is 15% to 20% at most for the base M3 (non pro/max) So essentially we get the same real world performance but much better battery life.
Nah. Real world IMO battery is moot because every mobile M2 is already enough for what anyone actually needs. So IMO evaluate other parameters like price, RAM, WiFi, Bluetooth, Thunderbolt, HDMI, displays, etc. as being more relevant.
 
Recommending in terms of 16 GB RAM is recommending 1/6 of what Apple makes available in laptops, today; IMO bad advice for what OS/apps will like to see in 2026, let alone in 2029. Eight GB would be 1/12 of what Apple makes available in laptops today.
That is a completely meaningless metric.

In 2019, 8 GB represented 0.52% the amount of RAM you could get in the top spec Mac desktop.
In 2023, 8 GB represents 4.2% the amount of RAM you can get in the top spec Mac desktop.

So, that represents a HUGE improvement in this metric 4 years later.
 
Where there’s smoke, there’s…smoke.
We talking about DigiTimes? Not Apple, not Apple…but DigiTimes?
 
I would think so, or think there's a chance, based on the premise that architecture (context: generational, not ISA) nowadays needs to be designed for the node it is intended to be manufactured on, implementing more guard-rails in the design the smaller the printing has to go.

A16 is designed for "4nm", seemingly closely related to TSMC's 5nm, while 3nm is a bit of a new era that likely requires them the re-think many steps. It doesn't make sense to me why they would have invested R&D transitioning the design of the A16 to 3nm when the finishing of A17 seemingly lines up pretty well.

But, casual onlooker here. Guess we'll see. Maybe chips of M3 size still don't make economical sense on the N3B-node (which from all we hear is expensive as * and riddled with issues) and the M3 has actually been a "4nm" A16 derivative all along. A hillarious nerd-community meltdown if that was the case!
Thanks for that. Good clarifications. I guess we will see.
 
Seems to me the M3 is really about the battery.... Everything I've read about performance is 15% to 20% at most for the base M3 (non pro/max) So essentially we get the same real world performance but much better battery life.
More about thermals than battery, though that’s a benefit of the die shrink as well.
There’s a reason the cooling is non existent on the M2 13” Air: it was supposed to feature the die shrink that was pushed to M3.
 
I got money burning a hole in my pocket for a new MBA with M3 and 32GB (hopefully) of RAM with a 2TB SSD. Would love to pair it with a new 8K Apple XDR display (maybe?).

Then I hope the 11” iPad Pro with OLED panel gets released, so I can dump money there in a max configuration.

And all ready have my money ready for the Vision Pro… take two please.

And I suppose I will have traveled somewhere to get my new iPhone 15 with a physical SIM card slot.

So why not just throw an Apple Car in the mix?

Well, it sure would be nice.
Sounds like you need to put that money on ice (CDs, Treasuries, Index Funds), unless all these products will help you make money. Otherwise dude, get a Dell.
 
Won't happen. Gurman is wrong once again. He's been consistently wrong and i've no idea why this site keeps reporting him like he's gospel. My own track record based on just common sense and understanding how business works is more accurate than Gurman.

Like I said last year there would be no M2 until 2023 and there wasn't, there won't be any M3 until 2023. There's nothing to update. The M2 MacBook Pros won't be updated within 12 months of their release. They JUST released a new M2 MacBook Air so it doesn't make sense to make that outdated in months. The only system due an upgrade is the iMac and if they're going to bother to do that at all (poor sales, hard to manufacture, lack of parts, long lead times) they'd just make the M2 version first.
 
Oh yes, bring them M3s, baby!
I must say, after having owned an M1 Ultra since May 2022, the mac studio was exactly the computer I wanted apple to make, at the highest price I could afford (but not more than that).
That said, I still feel 50% more power would be the perfect spot, and I think the M3 Ultra studio will provide me with that.
Thankfully nicely kept macs seem to hold quite a decent value in the used market, when sold used; I hope to make 1 3rd of my original investment.
This time I'll be getting 2TB though, as 1TB is barely enough.
 
I've been using 27" iMacs since 2010 and love them, but looking to upgrade and might have to go the Mac mini route this time around. I don't want a 32" iMac (no room), and 24" seems like a bit of a downgrade from what I'm used to. If I knew for sure the 27" was getting refreshed I might wait it out, but with Apple it's never clear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: El Szomorito
Well, it's clear from these two articles that Apple is on track to produce not only a 27" LCD iMac, but also 32" and 42" iMac models with either QD-OLED or WOLED displays...

LGD reports its financial results for Q2 2023, is on track in its 6-Gen line, but delays plans for an 8-Gen laptop OLED line | OLED Info

...and...

Omdia: Apple to switch to OLED displays in almost all of its tablets, laptops and monitors by 2027 | OLED Info

...it's about time, Tim! :) I've got a growing backlog of HDR footage that needs tending-to and working on a 16" XDR MBP "just ain't cuttin' it"! LOL!
 
Well, it's clear from these two articles that Apple is on track to produce not only a 27" LCD iMac, but also 32" and 42" iMac models with either QD-OLED or WOLED displays...

LGD reports its financial results for Q2 2023, is on track in its 6-Gen line, but delays plans for an 8-Gen laptop OLED line | OLED Info

...and...

Omdia: Apple to switch to OLED displays in almost all of its tablets, laptops and monitors by 2027 | OLED Info

...it's about time, Tim! :) I've got a growing backlog of HDR footage that needs tending-to and working on a 16" XDR MBP "just ain't cuttin' it"! LOL!
I don't buy those articles at all.
 
The ideal situation is Apple coming with a XDR 2.0 at 7k res and better specs and maybe larger than 32" and the current XDR dropping in price to $2.5k.
I'm a pro but I honestly can't justify paying $7k (nano/stand) for the XDR. The current Studio display is too small and I don't care for the speakers/camera/chips on it. I rather have a dumb display that can last a long time like my 30" ACD that is going to be 18 years of solid use.
yes I was think on that, a drop on the actual XDR.

I don't understand why some want something bigger than 32, I have a 27 and I constantly move my neck from left to right, I bet 32 I'll move more, I return a 34 wide monitor, I hate it. Overall more than 32 for a monitor IMO is a pain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Foxglove9
yes I was think on that, a drop on the actual XDR.

I don't understand why some want something bigger than 32, I have a 27 and I constantly move my neck from left to right, I bet 32 I'll move more, I return a 34 wide monitor, I hate it. Overall more than 32 for a monitor IMO is a pain.
I agree, unless you want to use some of it as a dashboard. Keeping certain apps up for monitoring..or informational references.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.