And that’s exactly why Apple isn’t going to do it.If that is the case then it will not sell as well.
And that’s exactly why Apple isn’t going to do it.If that is the case then it will not sell as well.
Are Google's PQ earbuds identical in its functionality, feature sets, blah blah blah as those of the Apple equivalent?Google "PQ earbuds" and you'll find them. Haven't tried out myself and I'm pretty sure there are many issues and caveats with that design, but Apple is pretty good in solving such problems when they really decide to do so.
Hell if I know, but you can google it! 😉Are Google's PQ earbuds identical in its functionality, feature sets, blah blah blah as those of the Apple equivalent?
Like a Macbook Pro?If you still want to pursue thinness, go for weaker devices that are not repairable.
I don’t think MacBook Pro is particularly “thin”.Like a Macbook Pro?
But all the choking hazards for the babies, for the babies!!! 😂Google "PQ earbuds" and you'll find them. Haven't tried out myself and I'm pretty sure there are many issues and caveats with that design, but Apple is pretty good in solving such problems when they really decide to do so.
I disagree (respectfully)Nothing inherent about it. If consumers demand environmentalism, they become compatible.
I don’t think MacBook Pro is particularly “thin”.
Sure sure sure, just build a laptop that could only be replaced rather than being repaired, even though there’s just one resistor going bad inside. Apple’s non-existent “recycle” could deal with it lol.It is thinner than any user upgradeable laptop.
Thankfully this is now moot with Apple deciding to prevent that from happening for the past few years.
I’m not trying to be obtuse, but where’s the conflict? Ask an environmentalist what their priorities are. If consumers adopt those same priorities, then an economy driven by consumerism is compatible with environmentalism. The logic isn’t that deep...I disagree (respectfully)
Please elaborate.
because I don't understand or see how they would become compatible in any logical, manufacturing, natural resource, heat and/or CO2 producing way.
If you could explain how that could be fixed in a consumerism /product manufacturing/supply chain way. I'd strongly reconsider my position.
They only way I can think of people "accepting/thinking" its zero-net polluting and sustainable is just plain old manufactured consent and marketing.
wow, yep that did it.I’m not trying to be obtuse, but where’s the conflict? Ask an environmentalist what their priorities are. If consumers adopt those same priorities, then an economy driven by consumerism is compatible with environmentalism. The logic isn’t that deep...
There are practical challenges in aligning the the two -isms, but nothing “inherently incompatible”.
What proof do you have from 2021 that Apples’s recycling program is nonexistent? I’m curious.Sure sure sure, just build a laptop that could only be replaced rather than being repaired, even though there’s just one resistor going bad inside. Apple’s non-existent “recycle” could deal with it lol.
trade offs.How much heavier or bulkier are these rival earpods?
I'd love user replaceable batteries but will it mean physically larger and heavier laptops and smartphones?
Sure sure sure, just build a laptop that could only be replaced rather than being repaired, even though there’s just one resistor going bad inside. Apple’s non-existent “recycle” could deal with it lol.
Earlier models do not have the storage nor raw performance relative to what Apple has output in the last decade.trade offs.
IPX certified water/dirt resistance? most likely not.
Glued glass wireless charging? probably not.
There have been thinner and lighter phones and laptops in the past that had user replaceable batteries in them. But none of them had the features listed.
If a lot of those machines (primarily smartphones) were supplier software supported I'd still be using a 2014-2015 smartphone.
Environmentalists dance around what needs to be done to get the wanted outcome due to their fear of being defunded.I’m not trying to be obtuse, but where’s the conflict? Ask an environmentalist what their priorities are. If consumers adopt those same priorities, then an economy driven by consumerism is compatible with environmentalism. The logic isn’t that deep...
There are practical challenges in aligning the the two -isms, but nothing “inherently incompatible”.
Yeah, when you think about what “inherent” and “consumerism” actually mean, it doesn’t take deep logic to understand that absolute statements like that can’t hold up.wow, yep that did it.
The lack of depth of logic definitely convinced me thanks.
Exactly. Why doesn’t Ferrari start building their cars with plastic!?Maybe they should take some of the crap out of their fancy boxes that people dont use, like all the inserts and fancy cut outs. Maybe put a cord back in there that people would actually use instead of forcing them to buy more packaging for a cable that should have already been in the box
That’s why we’re already getting articles about Apple pushing suppliers so hard. Apple is serious about their timeline. Apple will catch hell if they don’t meet it. We already have posters here saying Apples’s recycling is fake news.Seems like a lot of work has to be done to meet targets by 2030.
Here’s a thought; what if, after analysis, your ’obvious solution’ actually turns out to be worse for the environment? Your statement sounds intuitively true, but do you know if it’s actually true?I'm just annoyed how Apple keynotes continuously boast about their environmental targets while they are turning a blind eye to most obvious solutions. Sure, I understand the business logic behind it, but that doesn't make it less hypocritical.