Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,543
39,399


Apple has told Australia's competition watchdog that it's "surprised" to hear that some developers have concerns over the App Store and the process in which apps are reviewed, rejected, or approved for distribution on the platform.

appstore.jpg


In September of last year, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) launched an investigation into Apple's App Store and Google's Play Store to examine the experiences of consumers, suppliers, and developers in Australia.

The commission is set to release an interim report of its findings based on customer and developers' submissions on March 31. In an apparent last-ditch effort to ease concerns highlighted in the report, Apple has provided the commission with some more information surrounding its App Store and App Review Process.

In a submission to the commission, Apple says that it's "surprised to hear that developers have legitimate concerns about their ability to engage with Apple in the app review process," and that it "invests significant time and resources in engaging with developers directly" to ensure the quality of apps on the platform.

Apple lays out in detail the process of how apps are reviewed for distribution on the store. It says the app review system is a "human-led process" and that all human reviewers ensure that apps "are reliable, perform as expected, respect user privacy, and are free of objectionable content."

Throughout the years, Apple has sped up how long apps submitted to the platform are under review. According to Apple, 73% of prospective apps submitted by developers to the platform are now reviewed within 24 hours, and at the end, a final verdict is delivered to developers on whether the app is approved or rejected.

If an app is rejected, Apple says it provides the developer with information on the reason for the rejection, and says that the app makers have an opportunity to "correspond with the Apple team member who reviewed the app." Furthermore, developers have a chance to appeal a rejection to the App Store Review Board.

Targeting concerns that Apple exploits the app review process to maintain a dominant position in certain areas, or categories for apps, Apple says its goal is to protect consumers from "fraudulent, non-functioning, malicious or scam apps." Central to the review process is the protection of consumers' privacy and security, according to Apple.

Developers also have the option to make a formal appeal to the App Store Review Board. This is comprised of senior app reviewers with a high degree of experience in reviewing apps. The Board will review the app afresh and provide the developer with their response.

The main purpose of the App Review process is to protect consumers from fraudulent, non-functioning, malicious or scam apps. Central to the App Review process is the protection of our consumers' privacy and security. That is why the App Review process is iterative and some apps may require multiple rounds of submission before Apple is satisfied the app meets all of the Guidelines.
The ACCC investigation will include submissions from Australian developers about their disapproval of the app review process or how they think they've been mistreated by the Cupertino-based tech giant. Apple rejects that sentiment, however, saying that Australian developers work directly with its Australian Developer Relations team to offer support and guidance on matters such as developing, designing, and maintaining apps.

Article Link: Apple 'Surprised' By Developer Frustration With Its App Review Process
 
Last edited:
Between the Play Store review system and App Store's one, I really prefer the App Store one. Apple is more picky about how things should be done, but its far better than waking up to see your app DELETED from the Play Store without a real reason and with an ambiguous explanation. Then you have to send them a support email that will take longer to get replied than you sending another build to the Play Store that they will allow and then AGAIN delete it from the Play Store for the same dumb reason and the same ambiguous explanation and you end looking for the solution on internet.
When Apple got confused with my app and rejected the new build I just sent them a message explaining how the issue was not a real issue and the build was uploaded the same day.
 
Are they kidding? Every update in the MacAppStore is super annoying. Getting an app codesigned and notarized is an IQ test. I did a first test on a second computer yesterday and got utterly awful error messages. Apple can't even send emails with links to click. Like when the contracts have to be renewed. Gods forbid that you forget that because then codesigning will fail.
 
As a developer I can confirm it is like fighting/talking to a wall. Communicating with an Apple reviewer is really a disaster sometimes. It depends a lot on who is 'examining' your app.
Also, the reason for rejection is often very vague (or plain stupid). It also happens that when your app is rejected, you offer your app again the next day without changing anything (except build number) and suddenly it is approved.
 
Although the UI is not super friendly with both App Store Connect or Apple Developer Account, I've honestly never had an issue with around 15 apps I've had a chance to be a part of. In case the app got rejected, the information provided was fairly clear and we've been able to fix that in the next build.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macdisciple
As an iOS developer, I am frustrated with the process. The review guidelines do not get applied equally and are sometimes even misinterpreted by the reviewers.
That's very true. It really depends who is reviewing your app. If you have an 'I-Work-For-Apple-And-I-know-it-better' attitude-dude, your screwed.
That said, there are friendly reviewers who are willing to help though. But the majority are not doing their work good (read: threat everyone equally) and have a big ego.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JKAussieSkater
Are they kidding? Every update in the MacAppStore is super annoying. Getting an app codesigned and notarized is an IQ test. I did a first test on a second computer yesterday and got utterly awful error messages. Apple can't even send emails with links to click. Like when the contracts have to be renewed. Gods forbid that you forget that because then codesigning will fail.
I have to disagree. Codesigning and notarising is mostly straightforward and something I never struggled with (Xcode takes care of that if you have the correct certificates installed).
Providing your app for reviewing is something else and can be a frustrating at times for sure.
 
As a non developer I am very frustrated with the lack of M1 macs iOS/iPadOS apps.

These developers need to stop having a whinge and make their apps available for the mac as well.

Yes. We really need PUBG on Mac! Especially now that it doesn't work on Stadia any more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LFC2020
I have to disagree. Codesigning and notarising is mostly straightforward and something I never struggled with (Xcode takes care of that if you have the correct certificates installed).
Providing your app for reviewing is something else and can be a frustrating at times for sure.

Back in the day (like, the first couple of years the App Store existed) it could be pretty painful getting all your certificates and such set up correctly. But now days, Xcode does everything pretty much automatically and it's far far easier.
 
The problem with app review is that the scam apps get through with no issues. You see them at the top of the download charts with their $9.99 weekly subscriptions, scammy paywalls and thousands of paid shill reviews. App review lets them through with no issue. The apps get cloned and you have 5 of the same exact app from multiple "developers" running the same scam. Reporting doesn't work, the only thing that does work is creating a small uproar on twitter.

Then legitimate developers get rejected for the nit-pickiest details from the most obscure App Store policies.
 
How many developers and apps? I’m sure there are legitimate cases as well as sour grapes complaints. Apple shouldn’t be surprised about the negative press though.
 


Apple has told Australia's competition watchdog that it's "surprised" to hear that some developers have concerns over the App Store and the process in which apps are reviewed, rejected, or approved for distribution on the platform.

appstore.jpg


In September of last year, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) launched an investigation into Apple's App Store and Google's Play Store to examine the experiences of consumers, suppliers, and developers in Australia.

The commission is set to release an interim report of its findings based on customer and developers' submissions on March 31. In an apparent last-ditch effort to ease concerns highlighted in the report, Apple has provided the commission with some more information surrounding its App Store and App Review Process.

In a submission to the commission, Apple says that it's "surprised to hear that developers have legitimate concerns about their ability to engage with Apple in the app review process," and that it "invests significant time and resources in engaging with developers directly" to ensure the quality of apps on the platform.

Apple lays out in detail the process of how apps are reviewed for distribution on the store. It says the app review system is a "human-led process" and that all human reviewers ensure that apps "are reliable, perform as expected, respect user privacy, and are free of objectionable content."

Throughout the years, Apple has sped up how long apps submitted to the platform are under review. According to Apple, 73% of prospective apps submitted by developers to the platform are now reviewed within 24 hours, and at the end, a final verdict is delivered to developers on whether the app is approved or rejected.

If an app is rejected, Apple says it provides the developer with information on the reason for the rejection, and says that the app makers have an opportunity to "correspond with the Apple team member who reviewed the app." Furthermore, developers have a chance to appeal a rejection to the App Store Review Board.

Targeting concerns that Apple exploits the app review process to maintain a dominant position in certain areas, or categories for apps, Apple says its goal is to protect consumers from "fraudulent, non-functioning, malicious or scam apps." Central to the review process is the protection of consumers' privacy and security, according to Apple.

The ACCC investigation will include submissions from Australian developers about their disapproval of the app review process or how they think they've been mistreated by the Cupertino-based tech giant. Apple rejects that sentiment, however, saying that Australian developers work directly with its Australian Developer Relations team to offer support and guidance on matters such as developing, designing, and maintaining apps.

Article Link: Apple 'Surprised' By Developer Frustration With Its App Review Process
Apple should go completely walled,
They can make all their own apps or just buy out the greedy developers.
Would be much smoother
#fdevelopers
 
  • Disagree
  • Haha
Reactions: DocNo and venom600
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.