You're right about the consumer thing. But why would you need such a large tablet for a simple remote (assuming that fig. 9 is close to the real thing)? Really, for an effective iTunes remote, you don't need anything bigger than an iPod. Even if this 'remote' controlled other apps like quicktime and dvd player, it'd still be overkill. It's not cheap producing a touch LCD screen that size. You'd need a decent graphics processor to drive it, plus airport and a decent size battery. All in all, it wouldn't be a cheap, 'consumer' solution. Who'd be crazy enough to spend $400-500 for an iTunes remote???MontyZ said:I still think it's going to be some sort of programmable remote control device. Apple keeps pushing further and further into consumer electronics.
...And I'm a syndicated cartoonist, illustrator and graphic designer, so I also know a little bit about the markets I'm talking about.dongmin said:This is one of the biggest misconceptions. I was a graphic designer for magazines for four years and now just finished four years of architecture school so i know a little bit about the markets you're talking about.Originally Posted by Darrin Bell
Artists, architects, designers, technical illustrators. Pretty much anyone who draws for a living or hopes to someday draw for a living (assuming it works like the Cintiq).
That's only because of the disconnect between drawing on a tablet and watching a monitor. It's annoying not being able to watch your hand while you draw. And from what I've seen and heard from others in my field, they would love to get their hands on something like this.first of all, most illustrators who like to hand-draw would keep on hand-drawing on paper/canvas/etc. wacoms have been around forever and only a small percentage of illustrators use them.
The new Wacom Intuos 3 has several programmable buttons that have eliminated my need to use a keyboard, so no, pros no longer rely on keyboards for shortcuts. If an iTablet had a similar feature set, I and many other professional artists who use Macs (and are tired of spending hours scanning in hand-drawn images) would probably sell our left arms to own one of these.all modern graphic design programs have interfaces that are built around the keyboard and mouse. pros relie on their keyboard for shortcuts. the idea of having to do everything on a pen-based system would be horribly inefficient.
Fair enough, I don't really know much about architecture, autoCad, etc... So let's leave them out of the equation (although I'm not convinced that they'd have no use for it) -- it still probably leaves a potential global market of illustrators and art students (not to mention whoever currently uses tablet pcs) numbering in the millions. I'm sure there are other uses for such a device that I haven't thought of.architects don't "draw" anymore. most people use AutoCAD which is heavily command-based. same for any kind of visualizing and modeling.
so if you're having to lug around a keyboard all the time to use photoshop, illustrator, autocad, etc., what's the point of having a tablet???
![]()
What you're suggesting is a tablet with a touch screen sophisticated enough to use for illustrating. As I referenced before, the 17" Cintiq goes for $1800, just for the display. Let's say a compact version, a 12" screen, can be had for 2/3 the price--$1200. Add that to the cost of an iBook, probably about $800 without the screen, and you're talking about a $2000 for 'low-end' system. As a frame of reference, Apple sold a total of 195,000 PowerBooks at an average price of little over $2000 last quarter. You see where I'm driving at??? A tablet geared for artists is gonna be expensive and end up being a limited niche product.Darrin Bell said:Fair enough, I don't really know much about architecture, autoCad, etc... So let's leave them out of the equation (although I'm not convinced that they'd have no use for it) -- it still probably leaves a potential global market of illustrators and art students (not to mention whoever currently uses tablet pcs) numbering in the millions. I'm sure there are other uses for such a device that I haven't thought of.
The Cintiq's way too expensive, but since I've seen Tablet PCs for about $1200 that include keyboards and hard drives, I'd wager Apple could keep the price below $1500. That's actually not that expensive, even for a starving professional artist like me.dongmin said:What you're suggesting is a tablet with a touch screen sophisticated enough to use for illustrating. As I referenced before, the 17" Cintiq goes for $1800, just for the display. Let's say a compact version, a 12" screen, can be had for 2/3 the price--$1200. Add that to the cost of an iBook, probably about $800 without the screen, and you're talking about a $2000 for 'low-end' system.
I agree it would cost more than a Mac Mini, but I don't think the price would be outrageous. And Apple could simply do what other PC manufacturers have done and add a stowaway keyboard (make the screen swivel, or do something original) to turn it into a full-fledged laptop/tablet hybrid. As for limited niche products, that's what most people say the Mac is, and it's doing pretty well. I, for one, am not willing to predict that the niche for an iTablet would be too small to be successful.As a frame of reference, Apple sold a total of 195,000 PowerBooks at an average price of little over $2000 last quarter. You see where I'm driving at??? A tablet geared for artists is gonna be expensive and end up being a limited niche product.
I'm sure they can think of something.And we haven't even discussed the whole question of what Apple can add that's not out in the market already.
Only if you don't mind being tethered to your desk all day. I'd like to be able to go sit out on the balcony or at the beach with my tablet on my lap and draw.As you say, the Wacom Intuos are nice products, as are the Cintiqs. It's a good solution for people who like pen solution.
I'm a little confused about this. If it's a portable Mac Mini that means it's a self contained system with a screen you can "write" (or in my case, "draw") on. That sounds exactly like what I've been advocating, only with a slightly more sophisticated screen that has Graphire-level pressure sensitivity for those who want to pay around $1000 (and an option for one that has Intuos-level pressure sensitivity, for those who don't mind paying $1500-$2000 for it). IF Apple could keep the price in those ranges and make it appealing in some way that current tablet PC makers haven't (like they did with the MP3 player), I think this would have a good shot.The vision I'm offering is at the other end of the spectrum: a consumer-level system with cheap touchscreens that you find in PDAs. It'd be priced in that magic sub-$1000 range. And it'd be designed specifically with consumer applications in mind, i.e. music, video, chatting, web surfing, etc. You can look at it as a suped up ipod or as a portable mac mini.
Darrin Bell said:...And I'm a syndicated cartoonist, illustrator and graphic designer, -- it still probably leaves a potential global market of illustrators and art students (not to mention whoever currently uses tablet pcs) numbering in the millions.
dongmin said:You're right about the consumer thing. But why would you need such a large tablet for a simple remote...
I guess you missed the part where I said "not to mention whoever currently uses tablet pcs." I didn't mean to say they should design a product for graphic designers and art students (and other professional artists), I only mean to say that's one market it would appeal to (not the only one).speleoterra said:like that's Apple's business stratagy for the future?, developing products for
graphic designer & art students? Thats the 80's man.
Feel free to stick to those, I would be happy to switch. Having choices is good. As you know, different consumers want different systems.Yea, shareholders would love that product debut, watch the stock plummet.
(well then I'd buy some more i guess) I'll stick with my table, pen and paper for illustrating thank you and wacom for photoshop.
I love when people only reply to parts of posts, ignoring the rest. Such as the part where I said "or something original." I'm sure if anyone could come up with a good solution to the keyboard issue, it would be Apple.and as for a swivel screen that lies flat back on the notebook,..Uh,
i think thats what a PC tablent is. Apples not going to follow that route
Dr.Gargoyle said:If so, how does this contraption (turtle tank or computer) differ from any generic tablet computer? I was under the impression that patent protection only was given to unique designs.
I like the idea, and you might be right. However, it is possible to imagine a stylus doubling as a pen, which would explain why there isn't a designated slot fro the stylus. As I see it it would be in line with Apples "less is more design". I don't have any problem envision Apple trying to sell me a $59 white plastic stylus/pen.![]()
MOSR is reporting that the tablet was prototyped and dropped for lack of market.Sedulous said:One thing is for certain, if this is going to be a tablet, it will probably find itself used mostly in an industrial setting. It is still more efficient to type. Besting the current form factor of the "notebook computer" is going to be hard.