Do we really need another OS and UI to learn to use?
Yes.
I can't wait to see it!
Do we really need another OS and UI to learn to use?
Sorry, but that report said absolutely nothing and added exactly zero to what we know/don't know
Woof, Woof - Dawg![]()
I'm hoping for -
* true unrestricted multi-tasking ( unlike iPhone / Touch )
* Open platform where Apple aren't the gatekeeper / judge for what applications users can / cannot run on their own devices.
* Where developers are free to deploy to their device without paying apple $99 ( unlike iPhone ) - relates to above
* Not SIM locked if purchased outright ( i.e., no carrier contract )
* a damned good device![]()
Call me jaded, but when I'm in the mood for a "sexy user interface" I seek out a real live human female. Cold, inanimate devices just don't get me excited...
Sorry, but that report said absolutely nothing and added exactly zero to what we know/don't know
Woof, Woof - Dawg![]()
You might as well add Flash and a 500gb hard drive because all you're doing is dreaming.
http://✪df.ws/eer
Not sure if want.
I think you're probably going to be right about 1) multi-tasking and 2) carrier agnostic. I would expect those, even of Apple, even on iSlate.Yes, dreaming - sadly.
In the non Apple world, these would be no - brainers - developers and users alike *would expect* an open device, that can multi-task and install any application they like, without being carrier locked if purchased out right.
Sorry, but that report said absolutely nothing and added exactly zero to what we know/don't know
One annoying limit of the iPhone is it must be tethered to a "real" computer at times. Free the device; empower it and its user to run independent of anything else. My notebook is about to die; I _will_ buy an iSlate, but would rather not have to get yet another computer just to enable it.
Cloud- or App-based iWork would be my guess. But everything's a guess at this point.... I might have been interested if it were running OS X, so I could use Word on it with handwriting recognition (I doubt Word will get ported to the iPhone OS), plus all my regular programs. Oh well.
Just let me do native software development on it, please. Not like the iPhone currently where Apple bans anything that runs "arbitrary code"; I want a code editor, compiler, and debugger running on the target platform.
One annoying limit of the iPhone is it must be tethered to a "real" computer at times. Free the device; empower it and its user to run independent of anything else. My notebook is about to die; I _will_ buy an iSlate, but would rather not have to get yet another computer just to enable it.
It will have Windows ME and a touch Pen ! Anything past that is too much for me to learn.![]()
I think you're probably going to be right about 1) multi-tasking and 2) carrier agnostic. I would expect those, even of Apple, even on iSlate.
The other stuff... nope, I don't think, not so much.
Not the point, Dawg. Now Apple will have the media referring to their new thing as sexy.
Apple is playing this like a Beethoven symphony. A little bit of nothing every day as we keep our name in the headlines and try and put CES out of mind.
A third operating system? It's getting annoying to deal with OS X and the iPhone OS alone. Now we get to "learn" a third :-(
You may be right about about multitasking but I think you're wrong about it being available to more than one carrier. AT&T can't even provide tethering for the iPhone and Apple loves those high carrier subsidies.
Call me jaded, but when I'm in the mood for a "sexy user interface" I seek out a real live human female. Cold, inanimate devices just don't get me excited...
why on earth would you want to run the compiler/debugger/editor on the device? it would be far slower, and you don't have the advantage of being able to run at full speed while debugging/monitoring.