Perhaps to men it looks 10" but women say it's only 7".
Or perhaps men worry it is only 7" but to women it feels like 10".
This is not uncommon.
Perhaps to men it looks 10" but women say it's only 7".
7" would be sufficient if the media page you are reading is designed for that size. We don't have to have our books and magazines presented to us just as they are in print. And we certainly don't want them shown the same way but scaled down. We want a format that fits the device, the same way we want mobile versions of websites.Doesn't the 7" make more sense for a reader? Nah, maybe not if magazines are also available, but isn't 10" too small for the average mag? I just measured the paperback I'm currently reading, and it is 8 1/2" corner-to-corner, my weekly news mag is 13"?
Unlike Apple to chintz on the screen size.
I hope it uses a more advanced, full color e-ink technology. Eye strain on a back-lit display reading something for a few hours sucks. A Newton would be cool, but I hope it's not something that I have to have a subscription to use.
: The Apple Tablet will officially be unveiled next month (release in March) -- at CES 2010 in Las Vegas -- and the company has "asked selected iPhone devs to prepare high-res apps for the occasion." Yes, there are programmers already developing applications specifically for the Apple Tablet. Pricing has not yet been announced.
Apple has] told select developers that as long as they build their apps to support full screen resolution - rather than a fixed 320x480 - their apps should run just fine.
7 inches - isn't that roughly mousepad sized?
WIth the whole islate name going around - what's the potential for the 7 inch to be the slate mousepad screen multitouch, and the 10 inch screen the tablet?
I'm not so sure.7" would be sufficient if the media page you are reading is designed for that size. We don't have to have our books and magazines presented to us just as they are in print. And we certainly don't want them shown the same way but scaled down. We want a format that fits the device, the same way we want mobile versions of websites.
I say boo to 7". Too small in comparison to the iPhone. It simply wouldn't be bigger enough than the iPhone's 4"ish screen to be a differentiated experience. Apple will want everyone and their mother (including current iPhone owners) to feel like they absolutely MUST get one of these things, which is how everyone felt when they saw the iPhone. But at only 7", will current iPhone owners feel they need to have it? Maybe not so much.
In January they will end the month with:
iPod Touch 32GB $199 / iPod Touch 64GB $299
&
iMac Touch 7" 32GB $599/ iMac Touch 10" 64GB $799
Everyone will whine and moan because it costs too much, yet it will still sell rather well.
THEN, 6 months later they will revamp it with minor tweaks but the big news on the second revision will be a drop in price for the iMac Touches to $499 & $599 respectively
Love the suspense.I'm still holding out for MacTouch even though I think Apple's gonna resurrect the "new" Newton.
I'm still holding out for MacTouch even though I think Apple's gonna resurrect the "new" Newton.
Love the suspense.
There definitely is a wide chasm as to what it will be. My hope is more Newton, meaning more full featured, rather than just a bigger touch.
I hope so, too.
I'd like to see the ability to plug in an external keyboard. (Aren't there full sized keyboards that fold? Or maybe we'll get a compact keyboard of the same size as the Touch or Tablet or whatever it will be called, so you can pack it in the same pouch.)