Ditto! Tried it once and we couldn't get it to work, never tried it again. Easier to just pick up the phone and call or text.I don’t know anyone who actually uses this feature. Tried with a colleague once & it failed. Never tried again.
Ditto! Tried it once and we couldn't get it to work, never tried it again. Easier to just pick up the phone and call or text.I don’t know anyone who actually uses this feature. Tried with a colleague once & it failed. Never tried again.
Dear Apple,
For those of us who don't use Walkie Talkie (or some of the other built-in apps) please give us the option to disable/delete them.
Having an extra app on any device that one is not using just creates a potential additional security hole + takes up storage space.
Thanks.
I’ve honestly never used the feature. None of friends or peers use it either. Is anybody else not missing this?
"It has awesome security" -Steve
Yes, that is correct."It has awesome security" -Steve
Nothing serious is going here. Daily programming jargon as usual. I don’t know what you are expecting here. Wait, ahh, yeah, average user. So it is understandable that they cannot relate. Makes sense.Is Apple becoming the new Microsoft of old? Bug ridden software, slowly being hacked away. Even the official statement contradicts itself. What is going on over there?
Well said. Better than hiding it until critical damage is done, or even cover and spin the damage to avoid responsibility after critical damage.Toxic comments as usual. This is a standard process when a critical bug is found. No company is bug-free even if you have a robust QA process in place. Anybody who worked in a bit more complex software development can relate to this, often you find bugs that could have been in the code for years.
Yes, it is not a good thing. What would you do in this exact scenario? Would you delay releasing software until all bugs are fixed or release the software as scheduled and fix bugs down the road as more people using the software? I believe most developers will choose the later option.imo yes.
It is not a good thing when you have critical vulnerabilities in your software. Password-less root login, Facetime eavesdropping, keychain "keysteal" exploit, walkie talkie eavesdropping, so many more, and still no bug bounty program for MacOS. How you could spin this as something good is beyond me
watchOS 6 allows user to delete some built in apps. Hope walkie-talkie is delete-able.Dear Apple,
For those of us who don't use Walkie Talkie (or some of the other built-in apps) please give us the option to disable/delete them.
Having an extra app on any device that one is not using just creates a potential additional security hole + takes up storage space.
Thanks.
Because the reason you learn about these vulnerabilities is that Apple actually gives a **** and takes immediate measures while most other companies just ignore vulnerabilities (and the tip givers) until a journalist comes around and makes it a big story. Or worse try to make a solution while keeping the vulnerability up because they want to avoid bad press.
Highly unlikely, they could only block services from working if needed like this situation and the FaceTime bug months back.Oh I see
Can Apple stop an iOS/watchOS/macOS app from completely launching one fine day?
I remember reading something along the line a while back but can't confirm
Yes, that is correct.
After the bug was identified, Apple disabled the feature until it is fixed.
That is awesome security in a world increasing vulnerable to sophisticated hacking.
Really? How can you both hear the sound coming from the watch with all the racket in a busy mall? Unless both of you have bluetooth headphones/AirPods on all the time.Of course I’d miss it. I love walkie-talkie as it’s a quick and easy way to get in touch with someone super fast when you want immediate feedback without having to make a phone call. For example, my girlfriend and I use it all the time when we’re shopping at the mall
Yes, it is not a good thing. What would you do in this exact scenario? Would you delay releasing software until all bugs are fixed or release the software as scheduled and fix bugs down the road as more people using the software? I believe most developers will choose the later option.
And I guarantee you, another such incident will happen again in the future, just switch to a different app/OS.The issue is not how they handled this incident, but that it happened again.
At least Apple does not ignore vulnerabilities this time. And I am pretty sure Apple is still a reputable company as of today. What is your argument? Oh, Apple does not pay millions to critical system bugs found by people outside Apple. Got it.That is just wrong. Most reputable companies have established vulnerability disclosure programs, processes, bug bounties and do not ignore vulnerabilities.
Is Apple becoming the new Microsoft of old? Bug ridden software, slowly being hacked away. Even the official statement contradicts itself. What is going on over there?
I’ve honestly never used the feature. None of friends or peers use it either. Is anybody else not missing this?
Really? How can you both hear the sound coming from the watch with all the racket in a busy mall? Unless both of you have bluetooth headphones/AirPods on all the time.
Is Apple becoming the new Microsoft of old? Bug ridden software, slowly being hacked away. Even the official statement contradicts itself. What is going on over there?
And I guarantee you, another such incident will happen again in the future, just switch to a different app/OS.
[doublepost=1562836734][/doublepost]
At least Apple does not ignore vulnerabilities this time. And I am pretty sure Apple is still a reputable company as of today. What is your argument? Oh, Apple does not pay millions to critical system bugs found by people outside Apple. Got it.
I definitely do not have an issue with bug bounty program to find bugs before foreign governments and advanced hackers.It's just irritating, apple has huge eavesdropping security flaw again and then people here start praising them for their "awesome security"....
My argument is if apple had ”awesome security" they wouldn't have huge vulnerabilities resurfacing on other devices months after they have supposedly fixed it. And they would have a bug bounty program going to leverage crowdsourced security. Apple paying millions to researchers who find critical system bugs - yes, that is how bug bounty programs work... why do you have an issue with that? it's a win win.
True, but often not without good reason. Large companies are truly excellent at spinning things. Apple have a military grade marketing department and they are especially adept here.Toxic comments as usual. This is a standard process when a critical bug is found. No company is bug-free even if you have a robust QA process in place. Anybody who worked in a bit more complex software development can relate to this, often you find bugs that could have been in the code for years.