Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This would be the majority of my iCloud Voicemails then:

"Hello! Did you know there is a breakin every 3 mins in the United States? ......"
 
Loving the two convo's in this thread! Agreed punctuation in quotes!

As regards to siri, I find siri far better on the watch then the phone. has anyone else experienced this?
 
Just wish Apple would make some Siri features available offline. The old voice control allowed you to call people, skip music etc, but Siri just throws the offline error, very annoying when you are driving in an area with no data.

Don't you think that would be confusing? You'd have to memorize 2 sets of commands and you'd never really know what will work and what won't except through lots of trial and error.

And many users will not know why a voice command that worked previously all of a sudden stopped working while other commands still continue to work.

Besides, how often do people really find themselves without a connection and needing Siri?

I think Apple did the right thing here. If you're online, so is Siri. If not, Siri is unavailable. Very simple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jstuts5797
I hope this means I would be able to read my transcribed voicemails from any device, not just my iPhone. I love Continuity phone calls on my iPad and Mac, but the biggest issue I've had is the fact that I don't have access to voicemails from screened calls on my other devices. And I screen a lot of calls, haha. Just makes the whole service a bit less efficient and useful for me. This could really fix that, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jstuts5797
Siri's going to have to massively improve to be able to do this competently.

I still find that it doesn't always get my requests right; and that's me talking clearly to give it the best advantage.

There will have to be a high tech jump or clever tricks to overcome all the soft talkers, mumbles, fast talkers, ummmsers, jive talkers, etc.

"Somebody left you a voicemail Robert, do you want me to look it up for you in the Internet, or for me to just tell you about Handoff?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
If this is the same feature set as Google Voice, I sure hope they make it 1000000x better. GV transcribe is absolutely horrendous! The text I read vs the voicemail I hear aren't remotely close or even what the person talked about.
 
"I'm sorry Johnny, but Tiffany thinks you're a crazy psychopath who can't take no for an answer, would you like to leave a message?"
 
That's fantastic news! This will be huge to deaf and hard of hearing people as well as people who are too lazy to check their voicemails ;) I relied heavily on Google Voice on iPhone for audio-to-text which has been really good so far.

One more thing that's not mentioned in this article is that the new iOS 9 will have the ability to send the voicemail audio file via share sheet (iMessage, mail, etc.) which is huge!

Thank you Apple!

I don't get why you're so excited about sending huge audio files.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding you.
 
I'm a huge Apple proponent. I've been using Macs since 1994. So I'm not a hater. But Siri SUCKS! Just one example that drives me crazy all the time... if I'm driving and I say "Hey Siri, give me driving directions to Alderney Street" and there is no such street anywhere near me but there is an "Alderney Drive" say... 1 kilometre from me... it's too stupid to know what I meant and will give me driving directions for somewhere 2000 miles away in an entirely different country.

Another example, the other day while driving I said "Hey Siri, play driving" (driving being the name of an iTunes playlist) and maybe due to road noise she thought I said "call driving" so she says "Sorry I can't find "driving" in your contacts" and I say louder and clearer "No, PLAY driving playlist" and she says "Sorry, I can't find "no play driving playlist" in your contacts". It's enough to make you want to throw the phone out the window at 120KPH.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
So you are saying that if you can't decipher a voice mail that a human programed voice recognition system could? Or that it would be worth your time to a garbled computer interpreted mess before you then listen to the actual garbled mess? You are now spending 2x the effort as before. My experience with Google Voice is that even a brief message in perfect clarity and diction get distorted:

Actual Message: Hey its Sam Brinkman. Give me a buzz when you get a sec. I'll be in the office all day.

Google Voice version: Hay is some brick man. Give me a bus when you get a sec. Aisle bee in the office all day.

Funny! Thanks for the chuckle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jstuts5797
I wonder if this could be used to bypass Three UK's terribly outdated voicemail system, that still requires you to fumble with the keypad and listen to announcements in order to get your voicemail.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
hey thanks for sharing - your lack of interest in an optional feature you've yet to try, is very insightful and is a big value-add for me when I read this site.
Thank you for optionally sharing your disinterest in my post. It too has insight and added big value for me when I read this site.... :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
Actual Message: Hey its Sam Brinkman. Give me a buzz when you get a sec. I'll be in the office all day.

Google Voice version: Hay is some brick man. Give me a bus when you get a sec. Aisle bee in the office all day.
Frankly, that's good enough. When my Vonage VM gives me something like this, I can usually figure out that "some brick man" is Sam Brinkman by the sound of it, and get the gist of his message. Human brains have been correcting "signal degradation" of this sort for eons. In the infrequent cases where I'm not sure, I can actually listen to the message, but the rest of the time it saves me from having to.
 
Sounds great... If it works.

It's an Internet service, and it's Apple. Let's hope they can get it working well.
 
Personally, I'd like Siri, or some sort of system, that's capable of answering "No Caller ID" calls with a message that states I don't answer such calls (invariably they're sales calls) so leave a message if you're a genuine caller or call back without blocking your number. All without ringing at my end.
You don't need any kind of AI for that.
IF CALLER_ID == "Not Available" THEN ANSWER(SODOFF.WAV) ELSE PLAYSPEAKER(RINGTONE.WAV)

It's literally as simple to program as the kinds of conditional call handling that we already have: blocking certain numbers, playing custom ring-tones for others, etc.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.