Great idea. There are several content providers I'm willing to pay for. I think Google's model of an ad supported internet is fundamentally flawed
Of course they generate revenue, but the consumer has no idea. To them everything is free as the true costs are hidden from them and quality or effort is under appreciated. Good in-depth coverage is expensive and won’t be paid by advertising alone. Big newspapers can still do this, because they outsource a lot to press agencies and pay a part of the bills with advertising, but definitely not everything.
I doubt my local struggling newspaper will create a paywall App... and that is sort of my point. In the UK, I have a SKY news App which is free to SKY TV subscribers and £4.99 [about $7] if you do not. If I were not a SKY subscriber do you think I would be using the App on a subscription basis...?
I would be interested to find out how many people actually pay for the SKY App outside the TV subscription.
.Apple is planning to add subscription content from publishers with paywalls to its Apple News app, reports Reuters. This will allow sites that require subscriptions or memberships to view content to have more control over who reads their articles, but it will also introduce barriers for readers.
It does not matter so much to me how they are paid, because my point is that the consumer is not confronted with the costs of the press although it concerns or should concern them the most. Today’s mindset seems to be that everything can be paid for by advertising or investors’ money, or that watered down news snippets on blogs are adequate substitutes, as long as the consumer can have it for free. I think that this is a deeply troubling development and it may lead to the point where consumers become less demanding about a the press as a whole.
Apple is planning to add subscription content from publishers with paywalls to its Apple News app, reports Reuters. This will allow sites that require subscriptions or memberships to view content to have more control over who reads their articles, but it will also introduce barriers for readers.
All content on Apple News is available for free with the existing model, but with support for subscriptions, publishers like The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal could limit the number of free articles Apple News users can access before requiring them to subscribe.