this is a RUMOR. It hasn't happened.
Contrary to some folks belief, 9to5mac is not Apple. Just because they say something is going to happen doesn't mean it will. Yes it might be something someone proposed but for all we know Cook said hell no to it. And that site screen shot might be fake.
Until Apple actually does it how about folks put down the torches and the pitchforks.
As was pointed out by someone else, Steve Jobs allowed for charging folks for phone support. Which was not so long ago the same ilk as chat support, i.e. folks screaming it should be free.
Many places like MS, Best Buy etc charge you at least $10-20 just to run a simple diagnostic test on your stuff. Often prepaid, non refundable and not credited to any repairs. Apple in their stores charges you nothing. And despite saying those appointments are 10-15 minutes long they don't time you and toss you when your time is up. You could be there asking questions or whatever for hours. Sure they might 'multitask' here and there but they won't kick you out or charge you for going over your time.
If anything perhaps this fee is to get folks to stop calling or starting chats for mundane crap they should be able to figure out themselves, google for or is actually a question for someone else like their ISP. If the issue is my Earthlink email isn't coming in cause I forgot my password I shouldn't be calling Apple anyway, and yet folks do it all the time (same with going in the stores) cause 'i use it on my iPad' suddenly makes it an Apple issue
The next logical step is to charge for the same kind of support in-store.
Been to a doctor recently? A decision tree is what each uses, whether it comes out of a binder or from experience. (Soon those for medicine may be refined to the point that they will eliminate some of the need to go to the doctor's office.)
And once that AppleCare policy expires, how do you propose to pay for your aid?
Makes me glad I live a mile away from an apple store.![]()
They should keep this free instead of giving >$10B to shareholders every year.
He allowed it for phone support. Why wouldn't he for chat support?
Because chat support is less manpower-intensive for Apple, and less convenient for the customer.
In a chat setup a single support employee can help more than one person at a time, saving apple from staffing more employees. As for the customer, they have to type everything to the support employee now, including descriptions of what they're seeing. In a phone-support situation the user can describe and communicate faster vocally while still interacting with the machine, instead of having to leave what they're doing to change over to the chat window when they want to "talk".
Charging for chat support is one thing, but I'd say the rate is WAY too high. $19.00/incident? Try $9.99 tops.
The thing that might be throwing people off is the term "incident." This doesn't necessarily mean every time that you call is a separate incident. If you have one issue that you think you might call about more than once or twice before it might get solved, then paying the $19 for continued extended support over chat for the same problem over a longer period of time seems like a reasonable price to me.
That's a good point, but most issues shouldn't require multiple chat sessions to start with. If it does, whoever took that first support chat didn't really fix the problem IMO, and that's the opinion of someone who's been doing end-user tech support for 10 years.
Edit: Also, the term "incident" is up for interpretation. I've had people say two problems are the same thing just because they're seeing the same thing on their screen. If a problem is "fixed" and the symptoms gone after that, Apple is going to close out the "incident" at that point and the customer will likely have to pay again if they call back unless it's within a couple days of the first contact.
I had to vote up your post - I completely agree. Lets assume that that the rumour is correct - why the hell, as a paying customer should I pay second fiddle to some cheapskate demanding technical support on their Mac which is 6 years old? I've just recently bought a new Mac and I should be '20th in the queue, your call is important to use! please please keep holding!' because some person with a 6 year old Mac is venting to a customer support rep that they don't like the appearance of Contacts in the latest version of OS X. Honestly, the sense of entitlement is amazing - and in the whole time I've owned a Mac I've only ever rang up Apple once and it was for something really stupid (first time I used OS X and my brother had clicked on one of the three icons at the top left of the iTunes window which put it into mini player mode and I didn't know how to get it back how - I felt like a right idiot ringing up asking such a stupid question).
Tim Cook Angrily Rejects Political Proposal Asking for Profits-First Policies
Huh? MacRumors is full of posts from people getting their iPhones replaced under the "regular warranty" for power buttons that are easier to push on one side vs. the other, or a rattle from the camera area when you vigorously shake the phone, etc...AHAHAH, really ?!
The way they are now pushing Apple Care + plans, and not taking damages and failures under regular warranty anymore is just lowering their aftersales policy to regular crappy companies.
Shame.