Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Actually because apple will provide several additional layers of security the banks will be losing less money to fraud. Banks lose less fraud money, apple gets a piece of the action, retailers get discounted processing fees.

It is win-win-win. And I am confident google wallet will not be able to automagically jump on the train. This goes for all non apple pay NFC transactions.

Google will need to create that secure chip. The NFC isnt enough...
 
From apple's website:
Just add your participating cards to Passbook and you’ll continue to get all the rewards, benefits, and security of your cards.


THIS is my favorite part and sets them apart from google wallet. Apple is not really a middle man like google is. You will still get credit card rewards. If I am reading this correctly, This is HUGE!
 
You realize that after the Durbin Amendment made it into Dodd-Frank, that all the banks just shrugged their shoulders and raised their other fees to make up for it, right?

Actually they tried to and Bank Of America, JP Morgan caught so much flack it had to rescind the fees they were trying to add on.
 
Not sure why people are surprised that apple would make money from this to be honest.
 
From apple's website:



THIS is my favorite part and sets them apart from google wallet. Apple is not really a middle man like google is. You will still get credit card rewards. If I am reading this correctly, This is HUGE!

apple is the middle man they are charging banks fee for every transaction.
 
Did you have a cup of coffee yet? Please don't be amazed and justify this crappy service. Ultimately, we individual are going to pay for the cost of this new services. What do you prefer saving 2-5 % on the cost of the item for using your phone or carry a physical card. Let me put it this way. The more you look at it Apple and many other companies want us to become like iWall-e. Go ahead and use this crappy payment system.

Unhappy Android user?
 
At first I loved the idea of Apple Pay.

However the more I think about it, the more I feel that until adoption rate is at 90-100% in all stores across the US then its really not worth it.

I would still need to carry my cards around anyways, why not just use my card.

Until it comes to a point where I no longer have to carry my cards around, then I think I'll fully jump on board. But right now its just an addition to my cards I use.

Would i have to ask the merchant everytime I use my cards "Hey do you accept Apple Pay", that will get annoying quick.
 
At first I loved the idea of Apple Pay.

However the more I think about it, the more I feel that until adoption rate is at 90-100% in all stores across the US then its really not worth it.

I would still need to carry my cards around anyways, why not just use my card.

Until it comes to a point where I no longer have to carry my cards around, then I think I'll fully jump on board. But right now its just an addition to my cards I use.

Would i have to ask the merchant everytime I use my cards "Hey do you accept Apple Pay", that will get annoying quick.

It works through nfc, so you'd just have to look for the nfc terminal at checkout at the stores. I don't know that it requires anything other than that, but I could be mistaken.
 
I'm so confused why everybody on this thread seems to have this idea in their head.

Read the article

Merchants already are charged a fee per transaction by the banks. Apple is simply going to get a cut of that fee. Will that fee go up? Maybe. But it's not our fee. And most likely the merchants and banks will see what Apple is doing as a good thing to help tone down the rampant credit card fraud that the banks have to absorb.

I'm doubting the fees will increase because of Apple getting their share. They've done all the work (supposedly) to make it all secure.

back in 2009 (1/1) here in Sweden the banks and cc-companies forced the merchants to stop using magnetic-swipe, and start using chip-pin (online authorization) by making the merchant financially liable if any fraud was suspected...

a year later a law was introduced prohibiting a higher price using cc vs cash...
in the end every merchant now uses chip-pin, but some may refuse small transaction <5$ or so...

some skimming (copying the mag stripe) still occurs at ATM:s, but you´ll have a new card and your money back in 2 days via your bank..

my point is: shopping is already safe and I cant understand why my bank & Visa would be interested in Apple Pay, Google Wallet or other??
and how would a merchant be interested in yet another terminal??
 
back in 2009 (1/1) here in Sweden the banks and cc-companies forced the merchants to stop using magnetic-swipe, and start using chip-pin (online authorization) by making the merchant financially liable if any fraud was suspected...



a year later a law was introduced prohibiting a higher price using cc vs cash...

in the end every merchant now uses chip-pin, but some may refuse small transaction <5$ or so...



some skimming (copying the mag stripe) still occurs at ATM:s, but you´ll have a new card and your money back in 2 days via your bank..



my point is: shopping is already safe and I cant understand why my bank & Visa would be interested in Apple Pay, Google Wallet or other??

and how would a merchant be interested in yet another terminal??


Well, for starters, credit cards are not remotely secure here in the US. Chip and pin is literally just starting to roll out, and won't be completely rolled out for a long time now.

The merchants want to work with Apple pay most likely to attract customers that will pay that way. We will see as time goes on... There are still places that don't accept cards of any type: I refuse to shop at those places. I think it's mostly about giving the customer choice. Also, most new credit card terminals already are ready for Apple pay. If it's got NFC, it's ready.
 
Giving 100% of the transaction to the merchant, and denying vampire financial institutions their interchange fee, is worth the minor inconvenience. If more of us thought this way, we could make a serious impact on the outrageous fees imposed by the credit card industry. Be the change we seek to elicit, one consumer at a time.

In most cases, I suspect the merchant finds the SERVICE provided by the payment processor to be worth the COST. Otherwise, the merchant would stop using the services provided by the firms you call "vampires".

Relatively few merchants are cash-only, but that option is available to all of them. A cash-only business incurs other costs. Cash is risky to accept, handle, and store. It's labor-intensive, and labor is expensive. Fewer payment options means fewer customers - many of customers don't like carrying much cash.

It seems to me that many merchants VOLUNTARILY agree to pay the credit and debit transaction fees because the services are good value for the money, compared to the other alternatives (including cash) available to the merchant.

If you really have a hatred for "vampires", you are free to run your own business as you see fit. You can refuse any payment type that makes your blood pressure go up.

You can even go into business providing alternate, non-vampire payment services. You can provide it as a free service if you want to. Hopefully you are rich, because you'll probably need quite a bit of capital to run your free service, and I don't think you'll find many investors willing to put their money at risk. But there will be some -- so put together a non-vampire business plan and head over to kickstarter.com to fund it. I wish you the best. If your service is good enough, I'll even use it myself.
 
When Tim was going on about other companies failing because they just try to make money out of these sort of payments, I genuinely thought he was about to announce Apple had created an open standard...

Nope, they are just trying to make money from it, just like those 'bad' people he was describing, LOL. :p

You only invent something when you need it. You don't have to reinvent the wheel if something already exists that is usable. NFC is a standard, and one that many Droid fans are attached to. Adopting to this standard = switching those die hard Droid fans with nowhere to tap their NFC's to come over to the Apple side.

Just think of how many phones will need repairing / replacing as well as people swing them out to swipe them whilst trying to gather their shopping and drop them. I have fumbled my credit card a couple of times so something as heavy as a (larger) phone with my thumb rests only on the bottom?

Even more revenue.

You don't actually swipe your phone... SMH. Just tap it.

The inherent problem with Google Wallet, is that it is purely a software solution. This is Apple's new DNA, combining devices and software, working with all industry players and innovating and leading.

Apple's DNA has always been about combining great, simple software with sexy hardware.

The banks will most likely charge merchants a slightly higher percentage, which will wind up in Apple's hands

Actually, Apple negotiated lower rates for merchants who need to process cards but don't physically have them. By taking all the risk, and making the transaction more secure, it seems like there will be lower or the same rates for all participating merchants. The main part is the lower risk, which is why I think many will jump onto this rather quickly.

wait...
this will generate an huge amount of money only IF "you" buy Apple products and only IF "you" use ApplePay system.

by now there is NOT a LAW to use ApplePay System as the only 1 method to pay everything.

Anyway, it's going to be used much more in the future. Apple is always two steps ahead...

You don't have to have Apple products to do this - any NFC capable device should work. However, people will get the iPhone 6 because it can do it eloquently.
 
So what retailers are missing for you? For me its:

Walmart
Home Depot
Dunkin Donuts
CVS (Although I could just as well go to Walgreens)
Dillards
Barnes and Noble
Central Market (regional grocery store like Whole Foods)
Lowes
Office Depot
Bed, Bath and Beyond

Definitely need DD to be added.

For me it's (please forgive it these are actually supported)

MicroCenter
BestBuy
DXL (Imma fat guy)
Burlington Coat Factory
Quiznos
Chipotle

At first I loved the idea of Apple Pay.

However the more I think about it, the more I feel that until adoption rate is at 90-100% in all stores across the US then its really not worth it.

I would still need to carry my cards around anyways, why not just use my card.

Until it comes to a point where I no longer have to carry my cards around, then I think I'll fully jump on board. But right now its just an addition to my cards I use.

Would i have to ask the merchant everytime I use my cards "Hey do you accept Apple Pay", that will get annoying quick.

The adoption rate wouldn't have to be 90% . . . . not even 70% to be honest. If it was 40%, and just in the places that the target demographic shops then it will be a hit.

Even in this high credit nation of ours we still have to carry cash for various things. Apple Pay just makes it a little easier for us to NOT have to pull out our wallets and swipe and drop it and loose it.
 
Giving 100% of the transaction to the merchant, and denying vampire financial institutions their interchange fee, is worth the minor inconvenience. If more of us thought this way, we could make a serious impact on the outrageous fees imposed by the credit card industry. Be the change we seek to elicit, one consumer at a time.


Except that now the merchant has to pay someone to count the cash, balance the registers, hire two security guys and an armored truck to ship the money back and forth between the bank and the store. The bank then has people counting, accounting and whatnot.

If you for one second think that this does not cost money, you are seriously deluded.
 
Why waste time hacking a phone when you can much more easily lift a wallet?



If this means I lose my points, sadly I won't be using it.

Why would you lose your points? You are still using the same reward card(s), except the authorizations are transmitted via NFC instead of a swipe, or hand-typed via the keyboard.
 
Wow I think Apple Will have 200 billion in cash on their debit acc mid next year.

Not a chance in #3l!!

It will take quite some time to roll out this program. It will likely take 3 to 4 years before Apple turns any kind of profit on it. I can't wait for it to be fully implemented. GO APPLE!

Meanwhile, Home Depot's lax CC system compromised my MasterCard. Third credit card replacement this year. The current system totally sucks!
 
... the Visa/Mastercard/Discover/Amex monopoly ...

Do you know what "monopoly" means? There's a great hint right there in the word -- "mono".

If you take a bunch of distinct words, connect them with slashes, and then describe the resulting collection as a "monopoly", I think you're doing it wrong...
 
Well, for starters, credit cards are not remotely secure here in the US. Chip and pin is literally just starting to roll out, and won't be completely rolled out for a long time now.

The merchants want to work with Apple pay most likely to attract customers that will pay that way. We will see as time goes on... There are still places that don't accept cards of any type: I refuse to shop at those places. I think it's mostly about giving the customer choice. Also, most new credit card terminals already are ready for Apple pay. If it's got NFC, it's ready.

yupp, I understand safety is a valid point... but you still need a bank and a cc, and if you introduce a 3rd party (Apple in this case) whos paying that??
will you get 3 prices: 100$ cash, 110$ Visa and 115$ Apple Pay...
 
yupp, I understand safety is a valid point... but you still need a bank and a cc, and if you introduce a 3rd party (Apple in this case) whos paying that??

will you get 3 prices: 100$ cash, 110$ Visa and 115$ Apple Pay...


Merchant pays it.
 
Nope. Never. The greatest threat to Apple are open standards.

For some stuff yes... but not everything. If an industry's standard is too slow to catch up (e.g. USB 2.0), then it makes sense for Apple to try and create/use something better in the interim (i.e. Thunderbolt) until that industry catches up.

NFC is still pretty new in terms of adoption... and luckily it's not something that requires a lot of data to be transferred for each transaction - so it's basic enough for Apple to use it.

Remember, they still have iBeacon in their back pocket if they want to get fancy with things... but for now, the first step is signing up more users onto iOS and get many back into iTunes.
 
Wait, does this mean that banks will just turn around and charge us higher fees to compensate for the difference?
And with my Target Red card tied to my debit card I get a 5% discount. Will that discount not work with this type of payment system? 5% off a $500 iPad is $25. And I also shop there year round spending more than that.

Your red card is NOT tied to your debit card. Target has no access to your bank info... It is tied to your checking account number and your routing number. It is a check card, electronic, but a check, not a debit card.

I hate the name of the card. We save fees, we pass them on to you....

Signed,l just a "mouth breathing" cashier at target
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.