No, because the mac mini currently does integrate a quad core processor.
Is there any technical reason (like processor cooling or motherboard space) why a mac mini can not integrate a quad core processor?
No one could have guess that Apple will release new models of its products next year, except for DigiTimes exclusive source...![]()
What the iMac needs:
1. Solve the heat problems
2. Matte screen (maybe an all-black iMac, a stealth design?)
The heat problem will be a tough one: you don't want a ventilation system humming right in front of your eyes, don't you?
A solution could be to go away from the all-in-one design.
Remember the lamp iMac?
A future iMac could have a long arm like a wall-mount with the screen on it, and, through one single cable, it is connected to a box sitting somewhere under the desk.
As an option one could attach the screen right onto the box.
I'd relish the elegant form factor of that long arm with a very flat screen.
The box could even sit in an adjoining room. There could be different size options and power options.
And there could be screen options.
Instead of the all-in-one design it would be a modular design.
Theoretically, you could have a workstation quality box with Xeon processors as the pro option.
This way, the Mac Pro could go away, and at the same time, stay.
Apologies if I am missing something here regarding Ruahcr's answer? Because checking the specs of the current mac mini range I see:
Entry level "2.3GHz dual-core Intel Core i5 with 3MB on-chip shared L3 cache"
Enhanced level "2.5GHz dual-core Intel Core i5 with 3MB on-chip shared L3 cache".
The Enhanced level unit, ultimate spec adds the option of "2.7GHz Dual-Core Intel Core i7" for $100. If the mac mini had quad core, I would be buying one tomorrow.
Bring on the 2012 Mini with Superdrive,i5 and i7 Quad Core CPU's and Dedicated 1GB GPU and 1TB internal drive standard
Now that I woke up from that dream, I just need a unit with better GPU, and dual 1TB drives, also a nice boost in CPU and RAM would be nice![]()
Any word on when those are due out?
What overlap? There's no overlap, you have an 11" MacBook Air that has a weak processor, an okay amount of RAM for today, and an SSD, a 13" Air that's slightly faster, a 13" Pro that's way faster that has the option of either a hard drive or an SSD, a 15" Pro that beats the crap out of any of those three, and a 17" Pro that has the higher-end 15" Pro's options but adds extra ports, two more inches of diagonal screen real-estate and an ExpressCard slot.
It's one thing to talk like you know what you're talking about but not, and it's another to talk like you know what you're talking about and actually know what you're talking about. This site has a plethora of the former and way too little of the latter. My contempt is with the former group for incorrectly assuming that they are in the latter camp. Case in point: "Just improve the cooling system of the current design."
And how exactly would you propose doing that (hint: if you don't want to sound any further like you don't know what you're talking about, I'd use the words "thicker design", but at that point we're talking about something that harkens to an older and less problematic [at least as far as heat was ever concerned] design and your argument is rendered invalid)?
By the way, I will never look down on anyone for actually admitting that they don't know what they're talking about, especially when it comes to engineering quandaries like Apple computers and their anorexia.
should I wait anyway for the next iMac model to come out, or purchase whatever model is available at that time?
I made the switch to Mac about four years ago and I was planning on buying the 27" iMac when the new OSX "Mountain Lion" comes out. I was just wondering whether I should expect a complete redesign before then? And if not, should I wait anyway for the next iMac model to come out, or purchase whatever model is available at that time?