Apple uses Jamf to manage their own Macs internally. I always ask our Jamf rep if they’ve been acquired by the Fruit co. yet ?
What operating system does Jamf server run on?
Apple uses Jamf to manage their own Macs internally. I always ask our Jamf rep if they’ve been acquired by the Fruit co. yet ?
I'm fairly certain that Apple wants to get off JAMF for their internal usage and either use what is the underlying technology of fleetsmith or ABE as it grows up.It’ll be interesting to see how this pans out. Apple uses Jamf to manage their own Macs internally. I always ask our Jamf rep if they’ve been acquired by the Fruit co. yet ?
Linux and Windows. Jamf also has a cloud based solutions (running in AWS). Jamf just elminated the macOS version.What operating system does Jamf server run on?
Intune does not use Jamf for Mac Management. Intune has the ability to the be a complete MDM and management both iOS and macOS devices. (But, they do Mac management so poorly, they recommend companies consider Jamf instead.)Except that MS has been using JAMF for their underlying macOS management. I'm surprised that JAMF continued to allow Intune to use their technology once they went public.
And it still wouldn't be used by a significant number of enterprise IT shops with a major footprint, it would fill the same niche markets the products they just discontinued did.It won't happen fast but you know that Apple will be able to integrate better and force themselves into the market.
Awhile back — even before Apple acquired Fleetsmith — I was hoping Apple would create an iCloud-based enterprise solution. Google's Workspace device management tools are pretty easy & it's all in one place. If you had ever used Apple's DEP solution & its iterations, the whole way Apple set it up was clumsy as was the integrations into 3rd party MDMs. Apple Business & Apple School are kind of cheesy. Apple needs something completely robust & bulletproof if it intends to make huge in roads into enterprise & (back) into education.Apple is either going to announce some at WWDC or it has abandoned the Enterprise/Education/Business market which is insane considering the shift to BYOB.
But they have Apple Arcade!Enterprise and AAAgaming are two segments that Apple seem adverse to any actual long term investment in. It’s bizarre. Especially enterprise. If they managed to bring proper support and services for business, it could bring in so much money.
I'd be curious to see Apple develop a true MDM that rivals JAMF. Also an Identity Provider like Google (you've probably seen how many websites have a "Sign in with Google" button).Awhile back — even before Apple acquired Fleetsmith — I was hoping Apple would create an iCloud-based enterprise solution. Google's Workspace device management tools are pretty easy & it's all in one place. If you had ever used Apple's DEP solution & its iterations, the whole way Apple set it up was clumsy as was the integrations into 3rd party MDMs. Apple Business & Apple School are kind of cheesy. Apple needs something completely robust & bulletproof if it intends to make huge in roads into enterprise & (back) into education.
What in "Enterprise" are you looking for? Also, what's the profit margin for such features? If it's a low margin thing, that's probably why they're not in Enterprise.Enterprise and AAAgaming are two segments that Apple seem adverse to any actual long term investment in. It’s bizarre. Especially enterprise. If they managed to bring proper support and services for business, it could bring in so much money.
Since when. The last event they held that I attended about it they were saying the opposite.PM is not an MDM solution, nor has it ever been. Even Apple has said it is not an MDM solution and should never be used in a production environment.
With their current "commitment" to the Enterprise, I don't see this happening. But I could be wrong.I'd be curious to see Apple develop a true MDM that rivals JAMF. Also an Identity Provider like Google (you've probably seen how many websites have a "Sign in with Google" button).
If you are an IT guy in a school district, I assume you already know that Apple School Manager can integrate in several SIS's directly. ASM can pull all the student information from the SIS and create Managed AppleIDs. ASM can also pass class rosters to MDMs that support it (which is nearly all major MDMs). The MDM can then use classes to assign VPP books and apps.As an IT guy in a K-8 school district, I'd also like to see a student information system (SIS) and learning management system (LMS). Have it all integrated, so when a new student or staff member starts school, the SIS automatically creates a managed AppleID for them, and puts them into the appropriate classes, get their appropriate apps & books, etc.
Here, I have one for you. How about a way to effectively and forcefully update macOS computers? For many years, we were able to rely on the softwareupdate binary and various scripts to get users to upgrade. But, Apple is neutering softwareupdate. They introduced some new MDM commands, but they are inconsistent.What in "Enterprise" are you looking for? Also, what's the profit margin for such features? If it's a low margin thing, that's probably why they're not in Enterprise.
For at least the last 5 years that I have worked with Apple and MDMs. It was never meant to be a large scale solution. The database was fragile and would get corrupted, causing organizations to have to re-enroll all their devices. I can tell you I have NEVER heard and Apple badged System Engineer recommend Profile Manager for anything other than very simple testing. Usually it was to test new MDM commands that were in beta software as the regular MDM vendors could not roll out support until the OS's came out of beta.Since when. The last event they held that I attended about it they were saying the opposite.
I've attended several Apple meetings and presentations over the years where Profile Manager was referred to as a "proof of concept."Since when. The last event they held that I attended about it they were saying the opposite.
For at least the last 5 years that I have worked with Apple and MDMs. It was never meant to be a large scale solution. The database was fragile and would get corrupted, causing organizations to have to re-enroll all their devices. I can tell you I have NEVER heard and Apple badged System Engineer recommend Profile Manager for anything other than very simple testing. Usually it was to test new MDM commands that were in beta software as the regular MDM vendors could not roll out support until the OS's came out of beta.
The counter to that is then it NEVER should have been a paid app on the public App Store.I've attended several Apple meetings and presentations over the years where Profile Manager was referred to as a "proof of concept."
Profile Manager's lack of redundancy and general instability made trying to use it at anything other than the smallest of scales a risky proposition.
I agree 100%. It seems like a product that suffered from a lack of clear vision as to what it was supposed to be, and upper management having little to no interest in enterprise didn't help the matter.The counter to that is then it NEVER should have been a paid app on the public App Store.
If that was really Apple’s public position it should have been a developer only download.
I've deployed it at some pretty good size operations in the past with no issues. Apple "badged" people have never told me that and I heard the opposite. Profile Manager is in use at a LOT of companies. So I don't know where you got that.For at least the last 5 years that I have worked with Apple and MDMs. It was never meant to be a large scale solution. The database was fragile and would get corrupted, causing organizations to have to re-enroll all their devices. I can tell you I have NEVER heard and Apple badged System Engineer recommend Profile Manager for anything other than very simple testing. Usually it was to test new MDM commands that were in beta software as the regular MDM vendors could not roll out support until the OS's came out of beta.
Apple: We want your business’ business!
Also Apple: You won’t get any help from us in getting set up for using our products in your business!
Oh my god... Shake.Remember Shake?
I don’t think it makes sense at this point - at least not for an enterprise or education of any reasonable size as those institutions already have identity providers for their cloud services (Azure AD for example for Office 365) and device management solutions for other platforms.I'd be curious to see Apple develop a true MDM that rivals JAMF. Also an Identity Provider like Google (you've probably seen how many websites have a "Sign in with Google" button).
As an IT guy in a K-8 school district, I'd also like to see a student information system (SIS) and learning management system (LMS). Have it all integrated, so when a new student or staff member starts school, the SIS automatically creates a managed AppleID for them, and puts them into the appropriate classes, get their appropriate apps & books, etc.
What in "Enterprise" are you looking for? Also, what's the profit margin for such features? If it's a low margin thing, that's probably why they're not in Enterprise.
Dark Sky is still a separate app.That's exactly what Apple did with Dark Sky - bought it, shut it down, kept the back-end in place. Which is a shame, because while they've added Dark Sky features to the Weather app it's still not nearly as good as the Dark Sky app was. (That and Dark Sky had, you know, an actual iPad app).
For what it’s worth, Apple has already killed off the Android version, and the iOS version and Dark Sky API, which many other weather apps use, will be shut down at the end of 2022. (I wonder if we’ll actually have an iPad weather app by then…)Dark Sky is still a separate app.