Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,106
38,859


In its 2025 Environmental Progress Report released today, Apple revealed that it plans to expand its Clean Energy Charging feature to iPhone and iPad demo units on display at Apple Stores and other retail stores across the United States.

iPhone-16-Apple-Store-Levels.jpg

Introduced in the United States in 2022, as part of iOS 16.1, the optional Clean Energy Charging feature enables iPhone users to charge their devices at times of the day when the electric grid is relatively cleaner. Apple says the feature can reduce your carbon footprint by selectively charging when lower carbon-emission electricity is available.

In a new document, obtained by MacRumors contributor Aaron Perris, Apple said the Clean Energy Charging feature will be enabled by default on all iPhone and iPad demo units in U.S. stores, reducing the carbon footprint of those devices. To ensure that the demo units are always ready to be used by customers, Apple said devices will resume charging immediately in the event that they drop below 50% battery life.

Clean Energy Charging is enabled by default for customers too. On iOS 16.1 and later, the feature can be managed in the Settings app, under Battery → Battery Health & Charging. The feature is still available in the contiguous United States only.

clean-energy-charging-ios-16-1.jpg

It is unclear exactly when the feature will be enabled on iPhone and iPad demo units.

This is just one of several environmental initiatives and milestones that Apple has announced ahead of Earth Day on April 22.

Apple has a support document with more details about Clean Energy Charging.

Article Link: Apple to Enable Clean Energy Charging on iPhone Demo Units
 
Last edited:
Apple could expand on this function if it were to only enable certain things if the energy is relatively clean. Having a simple conversation with ChatGPT probably uses up as much energy as an iPhone for an entire day. So putting Siri-ChatGPT integration behind the clean-energy flag would have a much bigger impact on the environment. And there are probably many more examples of work that’s offloaded to external servers that requires a lot of energy.
 
Apple could expand on this function if it were to only enable certain things if the energy is relatively clean. Having a simple conversation with ChatGPT probably uses up as much energy as an iPhone for an entire day. So putting Siri-ChatGPT integration behind the clean-energy flag would have a much bigger impact on the environment. And there are probably many more examples of work that’s offloaded to external servers that requires a lot of energy.
That's why (among other reasons) iOS will try to answer your query first locally, then server-ly and only at the end chatGPT-ly ;)
 
The clean energy Home widget and the website from my power utility completely disagree about when the grid is greenest. 😬

Unrelated, I like those docks they have in the article photo. I wish Apple sold them, except they’d probably be $199.
 
I just knew there’d be a bunch of cynical ‘who cares’ kind of responses to this. If it reduces Apple’s overall carbon emissions, I care.

Meanwhile billionaires and corporations are flying private jets while I drink from my mushy straw.
Great comment. Funny, and yet extremely sad at the same time. I highly recommend this book on that very subject: https://books.apple.com/au/book/davos-man/id1563712153
 
Mother Earth was ousted because of the FineWoven debacle, since then all these environment friendly goals were paused and they focused on things that made money, like Apple Intelligence.
I wonder how many demo units need to have this feature enabled to offset the energy used by AI datacentres used to to generate one useless cartoon like image playgrounds image.
 
Meanwhile billionaires and corporations are flying private jets while I drink from my mushy straw.
Planes can be had for ~$30K, fyi.

The issue is less paying for the plane itself and more... what'll you do with it? They need a runway and hanger at the origin and destination. And you need a pilot's license. And I have to imagine the tiny planes like the ones I'm talking about are much more dangerous than just driving.
 
Planes can be had for ~$30K, fyi.

The issue is less paying for the plane itself and more... what'll you do with it? They need a runway and hanger at the origin and destination. And you need a pilot's license. And I have to imagine the tiny planes like the ones I'm talking about are much more dangerous than just driving.
30k will get you an OLD Cessna. Not more dangerous than driving, but it's gonna be a money pit of a plane.
 
For all the cynicals out there: while individual energy savings per user may be minimal, the cumulative environmental impact can be significant when adopted across millions of devices.
So I applaud these efforts.

Apple’s broader environmental initiatives, such as supporting over 18 gigawatts of clean electricity in its global operations and supply chain, have led to substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. In 2024 alone, these efforts helped avoid over 18.5 million metric tons of carbon emissions.

What have you done?
 
For all the cynicals out there: while individual energy savings per user may be minimal, the cumulative environmental impact can be significant when adopted across millions of devices.
So I applaud these efforts.

Apple’s broader environmental initiatives, such as supporting over 18 gigawatts of clean electricity in its global operations and supply chain, have led to substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. In 2024 alone, these efforts helped avoid over 18.5 million metric tons of carbon emissions.

What have you done?
I am not a green energy nut, but this certainly doesn’t hurt. I don’t understand all the hate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kalsta and hagar
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.