1) That would be a brilliant way to stifle innovation by turning everything a programmer or hardware designer creates into a big old millstone around their neck. Most two-year old apps and hardware will still work fine, even without any fiddling or updates. If failing to meet some indeterminate standard for "supporting" that thing means they'll lose all rights to it, then instead of spending resources to innovate new stuff, they'll be spending all their time "supporting" legacy stuff.
2) That's just insane. First, who's going to keep track of all that? There's a huge number of small-time and even amateur programmers out there who create apps and move on to other things in their lives. If somebody 20 years later wants the source code and supporting documentation for a 99-cent app somebody wrote once, who's going to find the author, and who's going to make that author go find their source code, if they even still have it somewhere?
What if they don't have it, or don't want to make the effort to look for it? Do they get fined? Do they go to jail?
Who is going to want to try their hand at programming or creating anything if doing so saddles them with what amounts to a lifetime obligation to support it or keep records and files?
3) That's even more insane. The Apple I was created 41 years ago, and discontinued a year later, by a two-guys-in-a-garage company. How is it reasonable to expect them to be responsible to "support" that machine? Ford is an enormous company, but they have no responsibility to continue making parts for and trouble-shooting any problems you might be having with your 1973 Pinto.
A critical part of both human growth and technological innovation is a willingness to make a clean break with the old in order to focus on the new. Saddling innovators with an automatic 50-year responsibility to fully support everything they create is a good way to kill off innovation. For any company that is less than 50 years old, your "law" would require them to intentionally commit less and less over time to creating new things, because they must commit more and more to supporting the old stuff. Using your vision for things, Apple would now mostly be a big repair shop, instead of a company creating innovative new tech. (Except they'd probably just go out of business, because that's just not a sustainable way to operate a company.)
Last edited:
