I just want a non MiniLED/OLED Macbook Pro to come out that's not 13" (Had headaches from the 16" M1 Max), not optimistic it's going to happen any time soon, but wish you could choose the screen when putting together your macbook pro.
If the MacBook base model is 8/256, the 15" with 16/256 will be $1899, too close to 14" MBPWeird choice. I still think the better move is to get rid of the 13” MBP, the “Air" refresh would just be called MacBook, add a 15” version of it soonish, and keep the current MBA form factor as an entry level.
Something like this…
~ $999 13” MBA (M1 maybe even $899, then back to $999 with M2)
~ $1299 13” MacBook in new form factor using M2
~ $1499 15” MacBook in new form factor using M2
~ $1999 14” MBP
~ $2299 16” MBP
I understand these replies when we get vague predictions about products said to be coming out 3+ years in the future, but on an article about an entry level computer being released in 3 weeks? I think that’s more than reasonable to expect from a website called Macrumors.Yawn...….i have a Source at apple that has revealed to me that Apple are planning to Unveil a Magic Unicorn that craps MacBook Pro's...enough of these rumours it brings down your credibility when you are instantly proved wrong by Apple.
I think this hypothetical iPhone SE-equivalent Mac should use the current MBA chassis instead, especially since the tapered design will be gone in the new MBA, providing a strong design differentiation.If this is the “everybody” MacBook at $999, then they can charge for the design on the Air and also keep a higher end screen on the Air. Maybe a 14/16 Air that crosses into Pro prices with RAM/storage upgrades. This could be the iPhone SE equivalent for their laptops. A newly designed but spec neutered $999 Air would stink. They need to start it at $1299/$1399, but that would leave a gap for their affordable laptop.
It makes perfect sense actually. It's going to be SE version of MacBooks. Some people like the form factor and Apple has some "old" parts to sell. It's a win-win.I'm skeptical on this refresh rumor. Keeping a 13" MBP that doesn't align with the MBP industrial design seems odd. I'm inclined to think there will be a 14" & 16" MacBook Air, versus a standalone 13" MBP that doesn't align to anything else in the portfolio.
Because this is Tim Cook Apple, I think they'll keep the 13" M1 MacBook Air around as the entry point and for schools, intro the "new" M2-based MacBook (Air?) in 14" & 16" sizes, and have the M1 Pro/Max 14" & 16" MacBook Pros. This is far more logical in its approach.
What about the people that like the Touch Bar like me. There are already pro models without the Touch Bar. Buy those models.Strange that they can't just take out the Touch Bar. After all they used to make a 13" Pro without it. Having real function keys would make it more appealing for a lot of Pro buyers.
Also seems strange to still be making just one model with a Touch Bar, when everything else has moved on?
32 GB RAM option?
At least it doesn't have a notch. And the speed bump may be inconsequential to most pro users. Should be interesting to see how well notchless sells vs notched.I don't see the point of this product. The entry-level Mac is the MacBook Air and a lower-end Pro device is just confusing people.
The 14" MBP would have promotion, faster m1 pro/max etc. whereas the 15" MB would not but of course would have the larger screen. There always is going to be some overlap of specs and people have to decide which of those specs they prefer.If the MacBook base model is 8/256, the 15" with 16/256 will be $1899, too close to 14" MBP
If the MacBook base model is 16/512, the 13" M1 MBA with 16/256 will be $1399, more expensive than the 14" M2 MacBook.
The 15" MacBook is almost impossible in the current lineup at this moment imo. There can only be 1 model between the MBA and M1 Pro/Max MBP.
I guess not:Will people understand that the M2 is inferior to the M1 Pro? Apple is perhaps risking confusing potential buyers...
I understand how they want to have lower price points from the newer 14" and 16" computers, but it would make more sense if they gave the flagship models the newer chip first. Personally, I'd buyers' remorse had a purchased an expensive model only to have it outperformed by a lesser model only a few months later. But I suppose that's tech for ya!