Well too bad for them, that’s why the MacBook Neo is here after all !Not really a great thing. I can’t even tell you how many people’s 2015 and 2017 Air’s that I’ve installed it on. It looks like Tahoe’s not going to be possible, so Sequoia will be the end of the line for security updates in a year and a bit.
That means upwards of 75% of laptops don't. There's a reason for that.I would buy the touch screen MacBook Pro day 1. I thought it was a gimmick until my work gave me an HP and I never looked back. ChatGPT says 25-35% of laptops worldwide sold have a touch screen. I believe it. Very handy.
The end of a great era. It surprising Apple let it go on so long.Finally no more open core legacy patcher !! IT’S THE END HAHAHA
More or less stupid than more AI? More or less stupid than more Siri?Touch interface on a laptop, what a stupid idea, I really hoped Apple wouldn't waste time with this. I mean that is assuming 50/50 Gurman is right.
With the claim that new Arm machines are likely to be out of stock for "months to come" it does seem a little strange (although not as strange as positioning reduced hardware support as a "feature") to drop support for existing hardware if you can't buy the new stuff. I suppose we'll need to see what the deal is towards the end of the year.Maybe Apple will reverse course and go all in on intel and release it for every intel Mac dating back to 2006.
Well AI isn't stupid, it's just non-existent in any real useful way with Apple at the moment, including Siri. That being said, I'm still withholding judgment until WWDC to see what Apple may have cooked up.More or less stupid than more AI? More or less stupid than more Siri?
Gotta be honest and say I’m not affected as I don’t have a Mac but every time I hear more about the direction they’re heading I want one less and less…
Even if they backtracked and decided to support devices from 2015 and newer, imagine how many devices would be saved from recycling and landfills. Countless devices would become secure and usable again.With the claim that new Arm machines are likely to be out of stock for "months to come" it does seem a little strange (although not as strange as positioning reduced hardware support as a "feature") to drop support for existing hardware if you can't buy the new stuff. I suppose we'll need to see what the deal is towards the end of the year.
Of course, I certainly don't expect support back to 2006 🙂
Apple needs to stop playing around with cars and super expensive vr and make products that actually make sense for them.I miss TimeCapsule.
My 120Hz display 64GB RAM Dell runs Arch hahaAnd if you're not a Mac user, despite all you might read, they are still the best out there. I HATE going to work each day to use my Dell (touchscreen) laptop with Windows.
let us turn off Liquid Glass !
Does it still look ugly as heck?
They are still talking about Liquid Ass. So yes, it still will look like a devolved Windows Vista.
Pedantry Inbound (but go ahead and correct me if I'm wrong, I can take it!): Time Capsule is a brand name for Apple's defunct router with integrated storage, not a catch all for network-based backups, right? Nothing in Apple's Time Machine settings refers to anything but Apple's router's as a Time Capsule, even Airport Extreme's with USB drives. Shouldn't it read "Time MACHINE backups will require a storage drive that supports more current file-sharing protocols like SMBv2 and SMBv3" or "Time Machine backups to networked drives"?No AirPort Time Capsule Support
Starting with macOS 27, Macs will not support the AirPort Time Capsule or any other storage drives that use the Apple Filing Protocol (AFP), according to a warning shown by Apple on macOS Tahoe. Time Capsule backups will require a storage drive that supports more current file-sharing protocols like SMBv2 and SMBv3.
Yeah, I'm going to have to buy a cheap used Macbook and never update it. One of my most important apps is an intel abandonware that works perfectly under Rosetta and for which there is no substitute. (Breadstorm, if you're interested) It's a simple program but nobody has replicated or reverse engineered it.It's a Snow Leopard style "fix the leaky pipes" release but the end of Rosetta 2 support is the kicker there. I work for a massive media company and you would not believe how many video production teams are using ancient Intel apps that either have no Apple silicon equivalent, or more often there's no budget/desire to upgrade to the newer, costlier, SAAS versions.
As it is, my entire July is gonna be rewriting our build because it even depends on some ancient apps that gotta go.
Any of the 64 bit Intel machines can run Linux. The hardware is indeed capable. Even the 2006 Intel Macs can stagger to life with the last 32 bit Debian version with the xfce desktop. Be warned it is a battle, not recommended except for the truly stubborn. 😉Even if they backtracked and decided to support devices from 2015 and newer, imagine how many devices would be saved from recycling and landfills. Countless devices would become secure and usable again.
All they would have to do is a bit of optimization. The hardware isn’t that old and still very capable.
As far is I know Airport Exteme’s with USB storage will also no longer function. Airports don’t support SMB2 or 3.Nothing in Apple's Time Machine settings refers to anything but Apple's router's as a Time Capsule, even Airport Extreme's with USB drives.