I find it funny how you left out Solar. No I am not a child. I always assume anyone who brings up age in a forum without knowing for sure usually is the child. I know you are probably not though which is more scary
I left out solar because I discredited in a previous post. It is toxic to produce, and impossible to recycle.
Why is that scary? Because I refuse to buy the neo-militant environmentalism you have bought hook-line and sinker? I would imagine I am way more eco-friendly than you. I drive a fuel-efficient (non hybrid), I recycle, and try to purchase products that can be recycled when I cannot use them anymore.
Have fun recycling your 400lb nickel-cadmium Prius battery. . . . oh wait . . . you can't.
----------
Why does it matter what their motivation for building the solar farm was? I have zero problem with companies using green technologies to improve their "image", decrease their operating costs, or increase redundancy. In then end, the result is the same: Companies are increasingly realizing that there are major costs associated with relying on antiquated, dirty energy.
The sooner we ALL realize the same thing, the better for the planet, our future, and the economy.
No I agree. I have no problem with Apple doing this. I was just pointing out it was probably done more for "marketing" than it was for "environmentalism"
and +1 on the dirty energy. I have yet to understand why we are still almost completely dependent on coal to power this country, when nuclear is available . . . pro tip --- don't build it on a fault line.