So you are willing to drive 65mph instead of 15mph which could save 40,000 people in the US alone rather than allow a worldwide speed limit of 15mph?
40,000. 600,000 (at least, if things continue as they are). ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
It's curious that you believe reducing the speed limit to 15 mph will eliminate more than 100% of US traffic fatalities, and that you believe people actually drive 65 MPH (presuming that's the speed limit on the roads we're talking about). Try harder.
Or, maybe stop and think about just how ridiculous it is that you're making
intentionally disingenuous (edit: point retracted — see below) comparisons to traffic fatalities (because you obviously looked up the statistics, and then rounded them up by nearly 11%) in a thread about Apple stores.
Interesting edit, by the way. The issue isn't the number. It's that you're (a) not going to eliminate 100% of deaths by driving 15 MPH, and (b) that the vast majority of the gains, if we're talking about driving 15 MPH vs. 75 MPH are going to be at the upper end. The only reason to suggest a 15 MPH speed limit is to intentionally draw a comparison to an argument that's somewhat ridiculous on its face.
With rare exceptions, no measure we can take is going to eliminate 100% of deaths from any individual cause. That's not the aim; the aim is to find a balance, and that balance is
never "I can do anything I want, because I don't care if I put your life at risk".
Again, I'll quote:
The other day I saw a guy driving a car by himself on a rural highway, 30 miles form the nearest town and wearing a mask. Unbelievable.
I think your reaction to the facewear of some person you've never even met says everything that really needs to be said here. Although, I feel I need to be clear that if you were to come back with a real, fact-based argument rather than resorting to rhetorical tricks, I'm always open to discussion and reevaluation of my viewpoints.