SoFi wasn’t expensive because it was built into the ground. It’s the most elaborate stadium in the US by far. Jerry Jones is crying. By definition, all NFL Stadiums are multipurpose. That includes concerts and other events. Otherwise they would sit empty 40 weeks of the year. The fact that MLS requires soccer specific facilities that can only be built to sub 30k capacity (because let’s be clear, a minor league baseball field has better amenities - I’ve gone to concerts at such venues and it’s comedy) speaks to how desperate they are to grow the league. Let’s be clear. Only four teams are profitable which is a joke.23 out of 30 MLS stadiums are soccer specific stadiums. Two of them were build with soccer as part of a dual purpose. The New York City stadium will move the team out of a baseball stadium and into a soccer specific stadium.
It is part of the rules of the MLS that you either need to build a soccer specific stadium, or one with the purpose of soccer being played on it with the correct dimensions, and without NFL marking on it.
The reason most MLS don’t cost billions is because of the capacity of them. They have a capacity of 20k-30k, instead of the NFL capacities of 60k-80k. SOFI cost so much largely down to how it had to be built in the ground, and has facilities outside of being a stadium. The Mercedes Benz stadium in Atlanta is one of the most expensive stadiums built and that was built with dual-purpose in mind.
MLS teams usually represent cities and urban areas, where as NFL teams for example largely represent whole and multiple states. As yet there is no demand from MLS teams to build such big stadiums.
The NFL gets decent crowds in Europe, they messed up this year with the pricing structure of the London games, but generally they get good crowds. A few one of games isn’t a bad idea but I agree, there probably isn’t a need for a European league. As for the MLS, the increase in teams with their popularity etc shows that there is a demand there.
The problem that I think people like you have is that they believe that MLS wants to be or even thinks it will become the number 1 sport. That’s not right, the MLS didn’t need to be number 1, 2, or even the 3rd most popular sport in the USA. It simply just needs to be there for an option for those who like the sport. As I have said the increase in fan attending and demand for new teams shows that those people are there.
The USA also has the advantage that many people follow multiple sports. So filling an NFL, MLS, NBA, NHL, and even a MLB team or any combination of them is fairly common. It means all those leagues have the ability to gain more fans.
In Europe that largely isn’t the case.
Soccer is popular around the world because anyone can buy a $10 ball and kick it around the yard. It’s also cultural just as Football, Baseball and Basketball are in the US. We have our sports, you have yours. Saying soccer is popular in the US is like saying the NFL is popular in Australia where rugby rules the day. It’s just not.
Last edited: