Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Tweaks Serial Number Format With New MacBook Pro
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
But why are his posts so important to you that you refer to him in your signature?
Quite a few members here have been doing this, in response to the 'off-topic' and proselytizing nature of his sig.
The real story....
Why such information is sensitive, and why it was requested to be removed...
Now THAT is a story!
Why such information is sensitive, and why it was requested to be removed...
Now THAT is a story!
Okay so AAPL legal asserted that this site is their b*tch. Sorry Arn but vague threats from AAPL and censored content is not what I came here for. If I needed such nonsense I would use Google in China.
Apple shooting themselves in the foot again. This is going to give them more negative press than if they just left it alone.
Of course it is impossible to police the internet and information, so requests like this from Apple are just silly.
Of course it is impossible to police the internet and information, so requests like this from Apple are just silly.
I hate censorship. I reprinted the entire article here on my blog, complete with image.
http://www.scriptedlizard.com
What, am I going to reverse engineer their serial numbers?
LAME!
http://www.scriptedlizard.com
What, am I going to reverse engineer their serial numbers?
LAME!
Quite a few members here have been doing this, in response to the 'off-topic' and proselytizing nature of his sig.
proselytizing, hey? nice. just a heads up, DMann, International Day Against Homophobia is coming up on May 17th. you might want to mark your iCal.
Thanks for posting that, I think it's of no import, but I agree if it's out there it's out there.
Thanks for posting this. I have to admit I had absolutely no interest in it until it was censored.
Thanks for posting this. I have to admit I had absolutely no interest in it until it was censored.
Much like everyone else that posted since it's been taken down. Don't know why they didn't just close the thread down.....
There's been more activity since.
If they hadn't censored the info I wouldn't have paid much notice to the story. Now I've spent 10 minutes re-reading the serial number format and committed to memory. Hmm, I wonder how long it will take before people start paper posting in and around Apple retailers, like concert listing billboards!
proselytizing, hey? nice. just a heads up, DMann, International Day Against Homophobia is coming up on May 17th. you might want to mark your iCal.
Thanks for that.
Though I'm not a homophobe, I do respect your decision not to incorporate that link with your sig.
Thanks for that.
Though I'm not a homophobe, I do respect your decision not to incorporate that link with your sig.
i wouldn't dream of including something so inappropriate for my signature on this site.
Why do you think they use China red in their logo? It's not a coincidence
I think he was trying to be as kind as you were
Yeah, that's what sucks about MR... But on the other hand, every now and then MR will publish the new iPhone OS browser configs.
I think MacRumors should offer an explenation for this removal.
When looking at the full story posted other places, I fail to see how any of this can be copyrighted by Apple. Its simply information about a change of serial numbers, with an illustration.
The fact that this story was rather boring, is not the point. The point is that MacRumors should be independent. If they are willing to just edit or remove their own content based on the dissatisfaction by Apple-employees, I for one am worried about the implementations.
No true journalist would ever do this, unless it was a clear law or copyright that was broken.
Publications and newspaper gets threats all the time. I once got a threat from Electronic Arts legal appartment, because I posted a sneak peak about some Need for Speed-game before it was released, while working for an internet newspaper. Big companies like EA can be very threatening, I know I was scared as hell. But Im glad the editors stood by my side and refused to remove the story, even when EA threatened to sue.
Of course there might be some details I dont know about, but if so, it seems strange that MacRumors didnt at least mention what copyright law or other legal thing they were breaking. To just state the the article is removed by REQUEST at Apple, I think is a little worrysome. You know, like any outside influence can just step in as the editorial staff and make content changes if they request so.
Yeah yeah, I know, I wont lose any sleep over this. Just saying.
When looking at the full story posted other places, I fail to see how any of this can be copyrighted by Apple. Its simply information about a change of serial numbers, with an illustration.
The fact that this story was rather boring, is not the point. The point is that MacRumors should be independent. If they are willing to just edit or remove their own content based on the dissatisfaction by Apple-employees, I for one am worried about the implementations.
No true journalist would ever do this, unless it was a clear law or copyright that was broken.
Publications and newspaper gets threats all the time. I once got a threat from Electronic Arts legal appartment, because I posted a sneak peak about some Need for Speed-game before it was released, while working for an internet newspaper. Big companies like EA can be very threatening, I know I was scared as hell. But Im glad the editors stood by my side and refused to remove the story, even when EA threatened to sue.
Of course there might be some details I dont know about, but if so, it seems strange that MacRumors didnt at least mention what copyright law or other legal thing they were breaking. To just state the the article is removed by REQUEST at Apple, I think is a little worrysome. You know, like any outside influence can just step in as the editorial staff and make content changes if they request so.
Yeah yeah, I know, I wont lose any sleep over this. Just saying.
It would be one thing if the information is Apple confidential, and leaked by, say, an Apple employee in violation of a signed agreement not to release such information. But if this information is freely available and just found by someone who happened to investigate it, then I agree there's no reason to bend to Apple's wishes. Unless, of course, MR has other motivations for staying on Apple's good side - continued access to other privileged information for example.
In any case I think the removal of the story is a bigger story than the original story.
What? Why? Thats the employees fault, yes?
OK, lets blow this up a little. If I worked for a tobacco company and had information that the our cigaretts had dangerous poison in it (The Insider is a terrific film!) and took that information to a newspaper, the tobacco company could demand the newspaper story removed, just because the employee wasnt supposed to tell them about it in the first place? Because thats basically what youre saying here, right?
This cant be right, at least its not in my country. There would be almost no investigative journalism if newspapers couldnt use tips from whistleblowers. There have been a lot of scoops that saw the light because someone inside a company or organisation was willing to talk. Often that person would break company policy, of course -- which is why newspapers often keep such sources anomynus.
Real journalists do NOT pull back news stories just because some company threatens them. Those of us who have worked a little as journalists know that, because we get legal threats all the time. Its part of the job.
Again, really disappointed in MacRumors removing this, and especially their apparant reason for doing so (a freaking request). It the information was false, they could just have corrected it or stated so, but they didnt.
No. I'm not talking about legalities or whistleblowing. All I'm saying is that MR might well regard a request regarding Apple confidential information differently than a request regarding information that is readily available in the public domain. It's still MR's decision as to whether the situation warrants acceding to Apple's request or not.