Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
65,917
34,665


Apple today unveiled the M2 Ultra chip alongside the new Mac Studio and Mac Pro, the most powerful Apple silicon chip to date.

m2-ultra-image.jpg

The M2 Ultra is based on the M2 Max chip that debuted in the refreshed 14- and 16-inch MacBook Air earlier this year. It is built using two M2 Max chips connected via "UltraFusion," Apple's custom-built packaging technology.

The M2 Ultra chip has a 24-core CPU that consists of 16 high-performance cores and eight high-efficiency cores. This nets the chip 20 percent faster performance than the M1 Ultra. Users can configure the GPU with 60 or 76 next-generation cores, which is up to 12 more cores compared to the GPU of the M1 Ultra.

The M2 Ultra features a 32-core Neural Engine that is 40 percent faster than the M1 Ultra, and it has improved video processing that can play back up to 22 streams of 8K ProRes video simultaneously.

Every Mac Pro now contains the M2 Ultra chip, supporting up to 192 GB of unified memory – 50% more than M1 Ultra. Apple also noted that with M2 Ultra in the Mac Pro, the transition to Apple silicon is complete across the Mac desktop and laptop lineups.

Article Link: Apple Unveils M2 Ultra Chip as Most Powerful Apple Silicon Chip Yet
 
Last edited:
You can really see the limitations of the existing SoC and the interior design of the Mac Pro. The expansion slots are the motherboard with the physical and electrical connections for the PCIe lanes. The SoC lives on a daughterboard.
 
Last edited:
  • Disagree
Reactions: Nicky G
It would be very concerning if it wasn't the fastest apple silicon chip yet.
I always laugh at this. Of course it's the fastest chip yet. I wouldn't expect them to announce "The slowest chip to ever be produced". Just announce it as a new M2 Ultra. It's safe to assume it's going to be faster then it's predecessor.
 
While this was expected, it's still deeply disappointing. M2 Ultra is 20% faster than the *M1-Ultra*, not the M2, in single thread. That puts it at exactly the same single thread level as the plain M2, which is 11% slower than the 6 month old ST king, the Intel i7-13700KS. Sure, the M2* has superior efficiency and does (presumably) fine on multitheaded workloads, but my workloads are inherently single threaded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darajavahus
You can really see the limitations of the existing SoC and the interior design of the Mac Pro. The expansion slots are the motherboard with the physical and electrical connections for the PCIe lanes. The SoC lives on a daughterboard.
Not really? It's more like the PCIe interface is the daughter card to the SoC.

What limitations are you referring to? Expecting memory expansion was never realistic with the unified memory architecture. I don't get the sense external GPUs are supported, this is a liitation, but it also makes sense, architecturally.

What you're calling a limitation is sort of the central design premise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jgleigh
Yeah but why is the memory bandwidth the SAME as last years M1 chips respectively?! Hmmm
Uh, because both of them have 8 memory controller, hooked up to the exact same bandwidth LPDDR5? So...

Next question.
 
Not bad, but nothing new. Just a predictable spec bump. Why did it take so long to be released?

Because interconnects are hard and they had to get the yields up. A lot of people wondered how they would even make this. That’s why they gave the interconnect a proper noun, they are proud of it. Reminds me of HyperTransport back in the first heyday of AMD.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.