Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Which do you prefer?

  • iPhoto

    Votes: 6 50.0%
  • Photos

    Votes: 6 50.0%

  • Total voters
    12

Artimus12

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Nov 13, 2011
539
114
YooKay
Didn't they say\suggest there'd be no more updates for iPhoto?

I thought it was dead, buried and forgotten! I've long since stopped using it. But it seems Apple decided to revive it with an update. Is this because they also think it's better than its replacement, or just trying to keep legacy customers happy? either way, More power to your elbow :apple:

Screenshot 2015-10-26 01.26.04.png


Now all it needs is a skin! Then maybe it'll be time to resync my Photos back into iPhotos.

Edit: Scratch the whole post. Seems I just got this because I reinstalled from a backup. :(
 

Evren Carven

macrumors regular
Dec 16, 2014
238
21
After I updating the latest version on my 10.11.1, I cannot open iPhoto again. When I click the icon in launchpad, it has nothing happened.
 

Partron22

macrumors 68030
Apr 13, 2011
2,655
808
Yes
They certainly updated Photos. Darn thing grabbed my 'open when camera attached' back from Image Capture.
Had to reset it so I can keep my photos as I want them.
 

merkinmuffley

macrumors 6502a
Dec 3, 2010
615
582
Iphoto worked fine for me most of the time and (I think) had a bit more versatility. Photos works too and so far the library hasn't gotten corrupted which was an annoying - but infrequent - problem with Iphoto.
 

oneMadRssn

macrumors 603
Sep 8, 2011
6,042
14,170
The single most useful thing Apple can release right now is an update to OSX Server that includes an iCloud feature, including Photos, so that advanced users can set up their own hosted iCloud and sync their pictures through Photos in iOS and OSX into a single self-hosted iCloud solution (in addition to the other iCloud features).

OS X Server used to cost $500, but today costs $20. I would pay closer to $500 again if it offered iCloud hosting functionality.
 

Ebenezum

macrumors 6502a
Mar 31, 2015
782
260
I am not impressed with Photos, I can understand that Apple wanted to modernise iPhoto. But why do it in a way that strips most of the best features away and end result is a mere shade of what was previously?

Examples of seriously lacking "features" in Photos compared to iPhoto:

1. Keywords can be edited but not as easily as iPhotos and it has problems importing keywords from iPhoto which is astonishingly bad bug or bad design.
2. Folders organisation is more complicated and intelligent folders lacks features compared to iPhoto.
3. Metadata support is very lacking, I am not sure why but most of the information provided by camera isn't shown in Photos unlike iPhoto.
4. Preferences is currently complete joke.

If Apple improves Photos it might be usable in about 5-7 years at the current rate of progress (given the lack of progress between Yosemite and El Capitan I may have look for a third party solution if iPhoto doesn't work in future OS versions).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Partron22
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.