Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster


Apple updated its App Store Review Guidelines this week, adding stricter language around low-quality apps.

Liquid-Glass-App-Store-Feature.jpg

The 4.3 Spam rule already barred overly simple apps in saturated categories, but Apple now includes language saying low-effort apps could be pulled from the App Store. Apps in oversaturated categories that are not updated, improved, or do not attract customers may be removed, according to Apple.

App Guideline 4.3(b) New Language:
Don't submit apps that are indistinguishable from what's already widely available. Opportunistically creating variants of existing app categories or popular apps degrades App Store discovery, reduces overall app quality, and harms both users and developers. Certain kinds of apps, such as dating, flashlight, sound effects, wallpaper, simple timers, and fortune telling, are well established on the App Store and we will not accept new submissions unless they offer a meaningfully different or improved experience. We may remove these apps from the App Store going forward if they are not updated, improved, or do not attract customers. Other kinds of apps, such as drinking games, Kama Sutra, fart, and burp apps, are mediocre, low-quality, or low-effort and do not add value to the App Store. Repeated submissions of this kind may lead to removal from the Apple Developer Program.
App Guideline 4.3(b) Old Language:
Also avoid piling on to a category that is already saturated; the App Store has enough fart, burp, flashlight, fortune telling, dating, drinking games, and Kama Sutra apps, etc. already. We will reject these apps unless they provide a unique, high-quality experience. Spamming the store may lead to your removal from the Apple Developer Program.
Apple says it won't approve dating, flashlight, sound effect, wallpaper, simple timer, and fortune telling apps unless they are meaningfully different from existing apps. Apple says fart, burp, Kama Sutra, and drinking game apps are "mediocre, low-quality, or low-effort" and add no value to the App Store. Repeated app submissions of this type could lead to removal from the Developer Program.

Wording on spam apps is clearer than before, and it sounds like Apple will approve fewer apps in saturated categories and may even clean up some clutter apps that get no interest.

Apple also added new detail to its 1.2 rule on apps with user-generated content, which is a guideline that has seen Apple threaten to remove apps like Grok from the App Store. Apple now makes it clear that app developers are responsible for removing content that violates App Store guidelines, such as pornographic content.
It is your responsibility to remove content that violates this guideline, your terms of service, or your community standards. If we find such content, we will ask you to remove it, and provide a plan to improve your compliance with this guideline. Based on your response, your app may be removed from the App Store until you can demonstrate improvements that bring your app into compliance. Egregious or repeated behavior is grounds for immediate removal of your app from the App Store, and from the Apple Developer Program.
Apps that do not have a compliance plan for addressing content violations could be removed from the App Store.

Apple's final guideline change (4.5.3) bars app developers from using Live Activities to spam, phish, or send unsolicited messages to customers.

The full App Store Review Guidelines are available on Apple's website.

Article Link: Apple Updates App Store Guidelines With Stricter Rules for Low-Quality Apps
 
Exactly! I'm paying $100 a year and HOPE people will try my app.. Now I have to worry about Apple deciding to randomly remove it because I don't have a better outlet to promote myself? Seems pretty short sided of them. I'm sure there's more to it than that..
Yeah there are ton of rules to follow and now what, if apple thinks there are too many similar apps they don’t allow them? Bruh….
 
Exactly! I'm paying $100 a year and HOPE people will try my app.. Now I have to worry about Apple deciding to randomly remove it because I don't have a better outlet to promote myself? Seems pretty short sided of them. I'm sure there's more to it than that..

If your app is of the same quality as your spelling, should I be concerned? Seriously, Apple's goal is to provide a store that sells quality apps. It's not a junk store.

Is your app unique and adds value, or just a means to make yourself money through the selling of imitation?

You always have the Android marketplace to distribute "stuff".
 
Or how about students who are developing (simple) apps for the first time, and are just jazzed to see their app in the app store. Nothing motivates teenage/young adults to develop apps more than the idea of mixing and matching farts!

When stickers in imessage were new, I helped my daughter in a high school graphic design class as part of her final assignment get her stickers into the app store through my developer account. Still one of the biggest smiles shes ever had seeing her family and friends download her stickers.

"We will reject these apps unless they provide a unique, high-quality experience."

If you create a lossless audio fart app you should be ok. $100 well spent.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.