If you look at Dells there is only 1 computer comparable to the Macbook; the XPS M1330.
Take the base model, add a 2.2GHz processor, Bluetooth, Wireless N card, and a 56 W/hr battery and youll be paying $1449. That is $150 more that a $1299 MacBook which comes with Leopard and iLife 08.
Oh please, don't give me that. If you look at the actual size comparisons of the XPS M1330, MacBook, MacBook Pro, and other 15.4" notebooks, you'll find that the MacBook really isn't that much smaller at all. Just single CM here and there.
For a little over $1500, you can confingure the XPS M1330 to have a better GPU, 85Whr battery (compared to the MacBooks 55Whr), and all of those other things.
I have my MacBook sitting next to my 15.4" HP right now and it is *barely* noticeably smaller. And my HP doesn't have the rough edges that cut into your wrists when typing.
Leopard and iLife aren't worth the inferior hardware.
The $600 15" laptops are crap. And even when you tried to equip it like a MacBook, you end up paying $1113 for something with junk software, horrible materials and design, that bigger and weighs more.
You can go to Dell, and for $1299, you can get the Inspiron 1520. It'll have a 2GHz Core 2 Duo (Santa Rosa), 2GB of RAM, 160GB HDD, DVD writer, and a 256MB GeForce 8600M GT. For $50 more you can throw in that 9 cell 85Whr battery. Yes the processor is "slower", but you're getting the same GPU as the MacBook Pro. Is it heavier? Maybe a pound more than the MacBook. Is it bigger? A cm or 2 in each direction. Junk software? Its hard to call Windows junk when you consider all the choices you get, especially when it comes to things that are important to many people.... like choices for online music stores, choices for burning software (sorry, Toast sucks), superior DVD players (DVD Player in Leopard is still a joke compared to Windows offerings), and games.
You have a point, but keep in mind that yesterday Apple was selling macBooks with GMA 950.
X3100 is definitely low end but I think, for most of us, acceptable.
Apple is still selling macMinis with GMA 950. That could qualify for "worst of the worst" GPU.
The X3100 is only on par with a low end GPU from 2002. For $1408 (MacBook in California after taxes), that is entirely unacceptable. Especially with no option to upgrade.
Dell XPS M1330 (the only Dell that compares to a MacBook)
Add a 2.2GHz processor, Bluetooth, Wireless N card, 56 W/hr battery so you get a comparable machine.
$1449 Total
And that doesnt take into account iLife and Leopard which make the MacBook more attractive.
Bluetooth? What for? I've had bluetooth in every one of my notebooks and I've simply turned it off. Completely useless. You're also forgetting that the Dell gives you the option of the higher capacity battery, 30Whr more than the MacBook, as well as an option for a *gasp* DEDICATED GPU.
iLife? The only iLife application that gets any regular use from most users is iPhoto. Picassa and Vista's built-in iPhoto rip-off work just as good. Leopard? Not worth it for inferior hardware and a lack of a dedicated GPU.
And, again, when you realistically compare the size difference, the MacBook and XPS M1330 are NOT that much smaller than 15.4" systems, including the MacBook Pro. Just a CM or so in each direction. That means that 15.4" systems can be compared. In that case, the MacBook is a TERRIBLE value, as is the MacBook Pro. Especially when you can get a fully loaded Inspiron 1520 WITH blu-ray writer and GeForce 8600M GT 256MB for several hundred dollars LESS than the entry level MBP. Oh and thats with a 1680x1050 screen too.
It's an entirely new platform under Santa Rosa that makes the MacBook more capable and well rounded against other laptops.
Except for the fact that every other notebook out there at least gives you the OPTION to upgrade to a dedicated GPU.
When you actually do the comparison properly with 13.3" widescreen slim and stylish notebooks from Dell and Apple, the Dell is more expensive.
Again, go look at the actual size specs available at dell.com and apple.com and you'll see that the MacBook and XPS M1330 are only smaller than 15.4" notebooks by a cm or so in each direction.
Anyway, its astonishing that people here are advocating Apple's ripping off of the consumer. IT's 2007. Every notebook should at least have the OPTION of getting a dedicated GPU. The integrated GPU in the MacBook is now on par with what low end desktops 5 years ago had, according to Intel's own words. That makes it basically useless for modern games, and even older games will still only be playable on the lowest settings. The X3100 is extremely slow, doesn't offer any kind of advanced video features that integrated GPU's from other manufacturers do.. why even use it? Oh yeah, to maximize profit.
It's also unacceptable that Apple forces you to spend $2000 to get a 15.4" notebook with a 128MB dedicated GPU. Some companies sell 512MB GeForce 8600M GTs in their system for under $1400! For $2000 you can get a PC that has dual 8600M GTs. If you were looking at the 17" MacBook Pro, you can get a system elsewhere with dual GeForce 7950 GTX cards with a full 1GB of RAM. Yes, the GeForce 7950 GTX is about twice as fast as the 8600M in the $2799 MacBook Pro.
Apple was getting competitive with their pricing when they first announced the MacBooks and MacBook Pros back in 2006. But now they've fallen very behind and charge much more for much less.