They passed on some of the savings to customers, instead of keeping them for more profits.I think you should thank Intel, not Apple. Apple did nothing in this "upgrade"
They passed on some of the savings to customers, instead of keeping them for more profits.I think you should thank Intel, not Apple. Apple did nothing in this "upgrade"
So? $50K is a high price for a fairly loaded 4 cylinder BMW 328i. You can get a similarly equipped Hyundai Azera for $15K less but that doesn't affect BMW sales one iota. Consumers that want BMW want BMW. Same goes for Apple. These are "aspirational" brands, not "penny pinching" ones. I doubt very few Apple customers switch to PC over price, they are already accustom to the price.
Apple lowered the price, not Intel, and it was driven mostly by lower flash storage prices across the board (not just on the rMBP). Intel made some modest clock speed increases that may or may not translate into noticeable differences in performance.
this analogy doesnt really work because parts are totally different in cars.
They passed on some of the savings to customers, instead of keeping them for more profits.
So, we should hank Apple for ripping us off less than before? Apple lowered prices because people stopped buying Mac computers in Q4 (as evidenced by their last quarterly report). And Apple had to lower prices because their laptops were not price competitive.
When company is ripping customers off, normal ones simply buy products from other manufacturers. Cult followers pay exorbitant prices and thank those who rip them off at every price drop.
Do you want to save money and use a 1366x768 Windows laptop with their crappy 3rd party system utilities and drivers? Be my guest.When company is ripping customers off, normal ones simply buy products from other manufacturers. Cult followers pay exorbitant prices and thank those who rip them off at every price drop.
Do you want to save money and use a 1366x768 Windows laptop with their crappy 3rd party system utilities and drivers? Be my guest.
I'm very happy with the experience of my Mac, it's worth more to me than what I paid for it.
i understand the difference in cars and computers but i dont think people understand specs and whats really inside of something.The parts that the user interacts with are totally different in apple gear, too.
As a beemer owner, I am telling you now, that the reason I bought BMW wasn't because of on paper spec, or that i have a few more horsepower or whatever.
It wasn't reliability either, because BMW's rep there isn't stellar.
It is the driving experience, the perfect balance of 50/50 weight distribution, the perfectly smooth drivetrain and lack of vibration, the way the interior trim fits together, the way the controls feel to use, the way the pedals are spaced for perfect heel+toe downshifting, the weighting of the steering, the braking feel, etc, etc. If you're after the 4 wheeled equivalent of a kitchen white-good, or if you're just chasing horsepower specs then none of that likely matters, and you'd consider the car to be over-priced.
However, I couldn't give a crap about the individual components inside the car - they are entirely secondary (or rather, merely a means to an end), so long as the driving experience is good.
Ditto for apple.
The product is more than the sum of the parts on the spec sheet. It's how they're screwed together, and the quality of the controls, screens, user interface, speakers, etc, etc.
Wow. Don't know what surprises me more, all the apple logos on those computers or the amount of kids in there and how close they all have to sit next to one another.
14 days - just back up your system and Apple will take that back and send you out a new one with the discount refunded.
Happened to me a few years ago on the black MacBook.
most parts of a apple computer arent made from them. cant say that about car manufacturers.
Ok. Then show me my options (weblinks please). I'm looking for a small light laptop in the vein of rMBP 13" with more then just Intel HD 4000.Evidently you haven't seen what is available for Windows based laptops.
Sure.
My point is, to the end user, it is irrelevant. The keyboard, trackpad, screen, speakers, webcam and OS are what you interact with, and what defines the user experience.
it doesn't matter if the CPU is intel, powerPC, ARM or AMD. It doesn't matter if the video is Nvidia or AMD.
It's what the machine DOES, and how the user interacts with it, not what it is made of that is important.
Nonsense, it's because people have being buying them they're lowering the pricing. I know several people with a rMBP, only one has the 13" so Apple are doing something right here.
Obviously just another "Apple is Doomed" post. What a load of...
You think ARM can run OS X Mountain Lion and give you good user experience.
How about Intel 4000 video chip for Mac Mini HDMI video? Good user experience
Ok. Then show me my options (weblinks please). I'm looking for a small light laptop in the vein of rMBP 13" with more then just Intel HD 4000.
Minimum requirements:
2.6GHz dual-core (or better) Ivy Bridge Core i7
2560x1600 IPS LED-backlit display
8 gig ram (or more)
256 gig SSD (or larger)
USB 3
Bluetooth 4.0 + 802.11n
(prefer Win7, but i'll take Win8 and just reformat / install)
I'm assuming 25x16 13" displays are uncommon, therefore i'd look at 19x12, but nothing lower. Graphics wise, Nvidia / ATI doesn't matter, but at least 1gig VRAM.
I do find value in Mac OS X so i'm willing to pay around $300 premium over the bare parts alone (is that still the retail cost of Win7 / Win8, or has MS dropped that?).
You think ARM can run OS X Mountain Lion and give you good user experience.
How about Intel 4000 video chip for Mac Mini HDMI video? Good user experience
You missed the point entirely.
Let me spell it out for you.
As an end user, for most people, knowing or caring what hardware is inside the box is irrelevant. It is what you see, touch and hear.
If the performance of X chip is bad, then it is the performance being bad that is relevant to the user, not that "oh it has X chip in it" that is relevant.
Why can't the 13" have this, Intel HD Graphics 4000
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M with 1GB of GDDR5 memory like the 15"? I ask because I am about ready to part ways with the 15" retina until I found out I have more graphics power.
When company is ripping customers off, normal ones simply buy products from other manufacturers. Cult followers pay exorbitant prices and thank those who rip them off at every price drop.
Well, if your key apps don't have a Mac version or don't lend well to virtualization then I guess you're stuck with either buying a Windows based laptop or just sucking up the cost difference doing bootcamp. But, having used OS X for 3 years now on my circa 2009 iMac there's no going back. Windows is trash and, good lord, now there is Windows 8 *cringe*.I have a 2010 MacBook Pro. I find value in MBP too, it's well built and very quiet. But I don't find value in Mac OS X because my key apps don't run on OS X. I bootcamp Windows 7.
Seriously, I'm looking for a Windows Laptop (Ultrabook) with very good LCD pannel, good colour, wide viewing angle and very low fan noise. It looks like only Apple does this kind of specification. I'm not saying other PC manufacturers don't know how to do it. But they just don't do something like Apple does.