Become a MacRumors Supporter for $25/year with no ads, private forums, and more!

Apple Updates Xserve to Nehalem Processors

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
50,441
11,827
https://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogodarkd.png




As rumored, Apple has updated its Xserve line of servers to the latest Intel Nehalem processors. Apple claims the new Xserves deliver up to twice the performance of the previous system.
Using Intel "Nehalem" Xeon processors and a next generation system architecture, the 1U rack-optimized Xserve delivers up to an 89 percent improvement in performance per watt. Xserve is available with up to two 2.93 GHz Intel Xeon processors and industry-leading storage options that include a low-power solid state drive (SSD) and up to 3TB of internal storage. Starting at $2,999, Xserve includes an unlimited client license for Mac OS X Server version 10.5 Leopard.
The new Xserve is available immediately from the Apple Store. The standard $2,999 configuration includes a 2.26GHZ Quad-Core Xeon 5500 processor and build to order options include dual 2.26 GHz, 2.66 GHz or 2.93 GHz Intel Xeon processors.

Article Link: Apple Updates Xserve to Nehalem Processors
 

justflie

macrumors 6502a
Nov 29, 2005
888
1
Red Sox Nation
D'oh. I just submitted this to you. Haha. Oh boy, there's that "performance per watt" metric again. :rolleyes: As engineer, that melts my brain on many levels. :D
 
Comment

edesignuk

Moderator emeritus
Mar 25, 2002
19,233
2
London, England
It boggles the mind that on a rather expensive server the RAID card is a $700 option, and that other than the SSD (who uses SSD's in servers?) the only other disk option is SATA. Where is SAS?
 
Comment

darrenscerri

macrumors regular
Nov 15, 2007
185
0
Malta
Haha new Nehalem Xserves! The GPU is a GT 120.

No more SAS option? There are only the S-ATA drives as options. Btw for those who are wondering a quick search in google, "ADM" means Apple Drive Modules.
 
Comment

Evangelion

macrumors 68040
Jan 10, 2005
3,314
5
It boggles the mind that on a rather expensive server the RAID card is a $700 option, and that other than the SSD (who uses SSD's in servers?) the only other disk option is SATA. Where is SAS?

I think the SSD makes quite a bit of sense. It doesn't eat a drive-bay and it has ultra-fast seek-times. There are quite a bit of uses for SSD in server-use IMO.
 
Comment

amac4me

macrumors 65816
Apr 26, 2005
1,303
0
I think the SSD makes quite a bit of sense. It doesn't eat a drive-bay and it has ultra-fast seek-times. There are quite a bit of uses for SSD in server-use IMO.

I think you're right and we'll see the adoption of SSD across more servers (and vendors) moving forward.
 
Comment

edesignuk

Moderator emeritus
Mar 25, 2002
19,233
2
London, England
I think the SSD makes quite a bit of sense. It doesn't eat a drive-bay and it has ultra-fast seek-times. There are quite a bit of uses for SSD in server-use IMO.
Perhaps in certain cases it might, though I'd still say that would be rather specialised. I stand by the rest of my statement though!
 
Comment

Babybandit

macrumors regular
Oct 29, 2008
126
0
Ordered 2 at 2.93 Octa Core. Going to swap the Ram and Harddrives later on.

Might pinch down for 2 more to swap out more of the school's old server. :)

But definitely going to see how well they run first.
 
Comment

themoonisdown09

macrumors 601
Nov 19, 2007
4,319
15
Georgia, USA
It boggles the mind that on a rather expensive server the RAID card is a $700 option, and that other than the SSD (who uses SSD's in servers?) the only other disk option is SATA. Where is SAS?

I believe the SSD is meant for the operating system.

Solid-state drive option.
Xserve supports a 128GB Solid State Drive (SSD) that doesn’t take up a valuable drive bay. When added, it comes configured as your boot drive.
 
Comment

Cabbit

macrumors 68020
Jan 30, 2006
2,128
1
Scotland
"Three independent hot-plug drive bays with support for SATA or SAS Apple Drive Modules."

Note the Xserve raid card is a SAS Raid card just not clearly advertised.
 
Comment

Sehnsucht

macrumors 65816
Sep 21, 2008
1,165
0
Now if my school would just order a rack of these bitches, I'd have no problem with it at all! :cool:


Haha new Nehalem Xserves! The GPU is a GT 120.

Better than the previous Xserve's integrated 64MB ATI chip. :D

But I always figured that you could throw a Mac Pro-compatible graphics card in one of these things, since the Xserve is basically a "squished" Mac Pro, right? Or is there even any physical room for a full-sized graphics card? :confused:
 
Comment

Schizoid

macrumors 6502a
May 29, 2008
827
429
UK
Yeah I know. Still seems like an odd choice when the drive bays are all stuck with plain old SATA.

Much better than the old standard 80Gb boot drive, although I would want an SSD boot drive, and 3 x 1TB RAID 5.... oh dear £4000..... ungh
 
Comment

Joe The Dragon

macrumors 6502a
Jul 26, 2006
737
170
"Three independent hot-plug drive bays with support for SATA or SAS Apple Drive Modules."

Note the Xserve raid card is a SAS Raid card just not clearly advertised.

3gb of ram in a $3000 system?

for $500 more then the mac pro they can at least put 6gb in there.
 
Comment

edesignuk

Moderator emeritus
Mar 25, 2002
19,233
2
London, England
"Three independent hot-plug drive bays with support for SATA or SAS Apple Drive Modules."

Note the Xserve raid card is a SAS Raid card just not clearly advertised.
ah huh! OK. Still crappy that in a server they charge you $700 to have RAID capability (hello! it's a server!). At least it brings SAS with it though.

Can't help but think if you pick up an HP Proliant DL you'll get all this and more as standard.
 
Comment

fleshman03

macrumors 68000
May 27, 2008
1,845
0
Sioux City, IA
But I always figured that you could throw a Mac Pro-compatible graphics card in one of these things, since the Xserve is basically a "squished" Mac Pro, right? Or is there even any physical room for a full-sized graphics card? :confused:

You know, I've always had this weird dream of having one of those screwed into the bottom of a desk and used as a "workstation" computer.

Weird thought, huh?

I'd venture that it could offer better power consumption and heat distribution than a MacPro, but I'd be talking right out of my ass w/o actually knowing if that's the case.
 
Comment

Cromulent

macrumors 603
Oct 2, 2006
6,039
36
The Land of Hope and Glory
Yeah I know. Still seems like an odd choice when the drive bays are all stuck with plain old SATA.

Nah, you can stick SAS drives in them. Apple just does not offer them as a BTO option.

Edit: Darn just checked out the config I would buy if I had the cash and it came to £19k roughly. Little bit more saving left to do me thinks :).
 
Comment

brisbaneguy29

macrumors 6502
Nov 27, 2007
370
1
Brisbane
I believe if you read the specs SAS is indeed an option,

"Flexible drive options.
Xserve 1TB Serial ATA (SATA) Apple Drive Modules pack up to 3TB in a 1U form factor. Rated 24/7 for server-class reliability and performance, these drives are an outstanding dollar-per-gigabyte value. Or add 15,000-rpm Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) drive modules and enjoy the highest disk performance available today. SAS drives deliver higher sequential performance (up to 163MB/s2), outstanding random-access performance, and best-in-class mean time between failure (MTBF) ratings for the most demanding applications."
 
Comment
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.