You never know if this was intended.Apple should have considered and foreseen this before. Developers shouldn't even have to complain in the first place.
3rd party developers are worthless without a healthy platform. It's a mutual relationship. Why should developers be the dominant players and be able to demand free stuff?I am always confused how people think a company who owns a platform that would be worthless without 3rd party developers, makes a major change that needs to get their partner developers on board, and is apparently owed something from their developers.
Funny how several members in the previous thread were calling developers ungrateful, whiny, immature, impudent children. 🤔🙄
Its called taking care of your developers. Remember macOS would be what it is today with out the vibrant community of developers creating apps for it.
"I should be served a new Mac mini on a silver platter without asking" is a bit too self entitled. Apple never promised one in the first place.Apple should have considered and foreseen this before. Developers shouldn't even have to complain in the first place.
A company with $200B in excess cash shouldn’t really care what the cost is on this, considering how important the transition to AS is to their future.How many DTK did they sell? I’m sure the move to $500 was good press at a negligible cost.
A company with $200B in excess cash shouldn’t really care what the cost is on this, considering how important the transition to AS is to their future.
I agree with the first paragraph, but you absolutely lost me with the second. Both of those things have been fixed. Modularity with the Mac Pro again, and butterfly keyboards replaced with a redesigned scissor key. Plus then you switched from developers whining to the entire community. Then back to developers.It's unfortunate the amount of whining towards something where Apple didn't do a single thing wrong caused Apple to cave which sets a dangerous precedent. Is Apple going to bend over backwards whenever the developer community cries, even if they're wrong?
Community needs to bash Apple where it hurts. Whether it's them completely failing with the 2013 Mac Pro, butterfly switch keyboards, or other weird design choices. Complaining about a voucher isn't one of those things.
I'm ashamed to be considered part of this developer community.
A company with $200B in excess cash shouldn’t really care what the cost is on this, considering how important the transition to AS is to their future.
Are you not a little above yourself.I am always confused how people think a company who owns a platform that would be worthless without 3rd party developers, makes a major change that needs to get their partner developers on board, and is apparently owed something from their developers.
If anything, the necessity of getting developers onboard with Apple Silicon for release day completely justifies the thought that Apple should have done this from the day the dev boxes were announced. The machines were always going to be needed to sent back under the terms of the arrangement, so they should have always been loaners, secured by money that would be given back. I am shocked that they only set the terms of that a few days ago, and then needed to scramble to change it after outcry.
And to your point.... Oh no, Apple gave them a support package. No, Apple should not squeeze their developers dry, Apple needs their developers - of course the developers deserve a support package when they are bringing M1 software out for the M1 launch. No developers = worthless platform. And, its not iOS which a large marketshare. MacOS has a small marketshare, and Apple Silicon had 0% market share when they asked developers to develop for it.
Apple would have been screwed if no body came out with native software right away.
It's not far fetched to spend a lot, specially when using paid libraries, but here's a comment from a supposed dev from reddit on their experience. Some had to buy their own m1 mac because the DTK was unusable.I’m confused. Don’t devs make money on their apps on apples platform? Also, does it seem far fetched to invest dollars into their business buy purchasing a product they develop their money making apps for?
Asking for a Friend.
People outside the dev program probably don't fully understand how unusable these machines have been for many of the participants and how little support Apple has provided in the dev forums. Then the program is getting cut off months early and the credit Apple is providing covers, like, 1/6 the cost of an M1 mini specced like the DTK (512GB SSD/16GB RAM).
Every developer I've seen is pissed.
To get "stiffed" would have been to be promised a refund (or credit) that was never given. The program terms never stated that a credit would be given at all, so it was generous of Apple to add that in later. And developers complained? That I don't understand.