iPod Apple v. Apple -- result!

zap2

macrumors 604
Mar 8, 2005
7,241
1
Washington D.C
Damn. this would likly mean Apple Corp is still not on good terms with Apple Computers... which likly means no Beatles music on iTunes

But still Apple Computers won so its ok
 

April Dancer

macrumors regular
Apr 11, 2006
243
0
Surrey, UK
zap2 said:
Damn. this would likly mean Apple Corp is still not on good terms with Apple Computers... which likly means no Beatles music on iTunes
I kinda like it that way. Gives me a little frisson every time I listen to a Beatles track on the Pod :)
 

HiRez

macrumors 603
Jan 6, 2004
5,825
1,735
Western US
zap2 said:
Damn. this would likly mean Apple Corp is still not on good terms with Apple Computers... which likly means no Beatles music on iTunes
This would be a good time for Apple Computer to take the high road and make a somehwat generous offer (more generous than NOTHING anyway) to Apple Corps to settle the issue once and for all, with no possibility of any future lawsuits of any kind, and with the Beatles library available on iTMS.
 

russed

macrumors 68000
Jan 16, 2004
1,613
0
it seemed pretty common sensical to me that our apple should win but you never know with these lawyer types! well good news!
 

Lollypop

macrumors 6502a
Sep 13, 2004
829
0
Johannesburg, South Africa
I think Apple comp should really reach out to Apple corp, get this thing out of the way and make peace somehow, apple comp will very likely more into a area of Apple corp again.