Apple Vision Pro ZEISS Lens Inserts to Start at $99

[MacRumors]

In its announcement of the launch date for its Vision Pro headset earlier today, Apple revealed that the optional optical inserts will begin at $99.

Because of the way the headset fits against the face, it does not accommodate glasses, but Apple has a solution for those who need reading or prescription lenses. Apple is partnering with ZEISS to offer optical inserts that can be customized to each person's vision requirements.

Apple will offer two versions of the ZEISS Optical Inserts at different price points. "ZEISS Optical Inserts — Readers" will be available for $99, while "ZEISS Optical Inserts — Prescription" will be available for $149. The inserts will attach to the Vision Pro lenses magnetically, allowing for precise viewing and eye tracking.

Glasses wearers will need a valid prescription to get the inserts, and not all prescriptions will be supported, so there will be some limitations that might prevent some people from using the headset.

The inserts are the only optional purchase directly for the Vision Pro headset that Apple has announced so far. The Vision Pro headset comes with a Solo Knit Band, a Dual Loop Band, a Light Seal, two Light Seal Cushions, a cover for the front of the device, a polishing cloth, battery unit, USB-C charging cable, and USB-C power adapter.

Pre-orders of the Vision Pro start on Friday, January 19 and the device goes on sale in the United States on Friday, February 2.

Article Link: Apple Vision Pro ZEISS Lens Inserts to Start at $99

 

[thingstoponder]

That’s not bad.

 

[FSMBP]

This doesn't sound bad at all, but also these are single-use lenses (unlike glasses/contacts that can be used in various activities).

 

[CharlesShaw]

I’m surprised by how reasonable that is. If you wear eyeglasses, ask your optician about getting Zeiss lenses on your prescription and you’ll be shocked by the price.

 

[vegetassj4]

That image in the article reminds of something 🤔

So the Zeiss inserts allow for improved vision? Tim Apple will show you the true nature of VR. He is your master now.

 

[gmanist1000]

So my genes determine how much I pay for the Vision Pro? I was born with terrible vision and I get to pay more money if I want one of these things. Yay me.

 

[fwmireault]

So my genes determine how much I pay for the Vision Pro? I was born with terrible vision and I get to pay more money if I want one of these things. Yay me.

This is true for a lot of things, not only Vision Pro

 

[gmanist1000]

This is true for a lot of things, not only Vision Pro

The thing costs $3,500. I think Apple should eat the cost for people who cannot control their eyesight.

 

[Pitogyro]

The inclusion of polishing cloth finally justifies the cost of Vision Pro.

 

[till]

Told ya, Apple doesn't want the PR disaster of $300+ for accessibility. This is a great price for Zeiss lenses.

 

[mukiex]

This is kind of bloody amazing. I was expecting like 4-5x this because Apple tax. I'm pretty sure bloody VR Lens Lab started out at more than $99. (it's like $59 now I think)

I'm still expecting like $199+ for me 'cause of my prescription, but this ain't half bad. I do expect there to be a massive wave of discussion as to compatibility on their next headset, though, provided this one survives.

 

[Born Again]

You guys are hilarious!!!

Yes $99 isn’t bad when considering you still need to shell out $3500!!!

 

[CharlesShaw]

The thing costs $3,500. I think Apple should eat the cost for people who cannot control their eyesight.

I think they’re including most of the cost in the price of the device, but need to charge extra for prescription lenses so that users who don’t need Zeiss lenses won’t complain about not getting them.

If some people were getting Zeiss glass inserts at no extra cost, then those who didn’t need it would be online demanding a [$500] rebate [because everyone knows how expensive Zeiss lenses are for eyeglasses].

 

[dannys1]

What?! Only readers for $99, Apple should have at least included prescription for $99 /s

(every thread on the forum at the minute complaining that Apple should have given them the next upgrade up for the price below, no matter what the cost is)

 

[Feek]

Wonder if they'll support prescriptions that correct an astigmatism.

 

[fwmireault]

The thing costs $3,500. I think Apple should eat the cost for people who cannot control their eyesight.

It would have been nice of course, but of all tech companies, Apple was the least likely to do that

 

[ipaqrat]

... The arm is moving...

 

[alphaswift]

Holy hell this is bad.
1) Does not support wearing glasses.
2) "Starting at $99" means that people with zero to a very small amount of correction might pay $99 (which undoubtedly have additional fees). For people like me with high astigmatism, the price is going to be significant on top of a device with an already significant price.

I have a Quest 3 and can make it work while wearing my glasses. For Apple's asking price they should be able to do the same. I guess they don't care as much about customers who are over 40 years old.

 

[Supercyborgninja]

Better off still buying contact lenses and buying some 30 day contacts.

But then again you’re then buying contacts constantly vs getting the whole thing dealt with.

Can they be removed so other ppl can use it?

 

[klasma]

So my genes determine how much I pay for the Vision Pro? I was born with terrible vision and I get to pay more money if I want one of these things. Yay me.

You also have to buy an iPhone Plus or Pro Max if you have bad vision.

 

[leman]

This is just sad. For that device price the lenses should be included. And what does
“starts at” even means? I have astigmatism and fairly large correction, does it mean I’ll have to pay and arm and a leg on top of already pricey device?

 

[GMShadow]

This is just sad. For that device price the lenses should be included. And what does
“starts at” even means? I have astigmatism and fairly large correction, does it mean I’ll have to pay and arm and a leg on top of already pricey device?

It’s $99 for readers and $149 for prescription. That was also in the article.


It’s $50 for Quest lenses from Zenni, so this seems like an okay price for these.

 

[iZac]

...per eye

 

[mozumder]

Wondering if my MetLife vision insurance covers this. I have high vision insurance.

 

[CharlesShaw]

Wondering if my MetLife vision insurance covers this. I have high vision insurance.

If you could prove that you needed it for work, perhaps they’d cover your $149 out of pocket cost?