Apple vs. Samsung Case to Return to Lower Court for Possible Damages Retrial

Discussion in 'iOS Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Feb 7, 2017.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit today ruled that a lower district court must decide whether a damages retrial is required in the long running legal battle between Apple and Samsung, reports CNET.

    The case will return to the same San Jose, California court where it was originally heard by Judge Lucy Koh. From today's ruling:
    Apple's dispute with Samsung dates back to 2011, when Apple sued Samsung for copying the iPhone's design. Apple was initially awarded nearly $1 billion in damages, but a significant part of that decision was reversed in 2015, leaving Samsung owing $548 million.

    Samsung paid the $548 million in 2015, but also asked the Supreme Court to hear the case in the hopes of reimbursement, claiming it was asked to pay a "disproportionate" sum for violating Apple's design patents. $399 million of the $548 million was awarded for the design patent violation, and in December, the Supreme Court sided with Samsung, overturning that particular damages ruling.

    The Supreme Court remanded the case back to the U.S. Court of Appeals to reconsider the $399 million portion of the ruling, and the lawsuit was officially reopened in January of 2017. The U.S. Court of Appeals was charged with redetermining the amount Samsung owes Apple for infringing on the design patents, a task that will now fall to the district court because the appeals court says the district court is better suited to make such a decision.

    The original damages award was calculated based on the profit Samsung earned from the sale of infringing galaxy devices, but Samsung has claimed the amount should not have been based on the total profits of each device, but rather the individual components that violated the patents, which the Supreme Court agreed with.

    The District Court for the Northern District of California will now consider arguments from both Apple and Samsung and determine what additional proceedings, if any, are necessary in the case.

    Article Link: Apple vs. Samsung Case to Return to Lower Court for Possible Damages Retrial
     
  2. farewelwilliams macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2014
    #2
    wonder how long until lawyers make more money than the case itself.
     
  3. givemeanapple macrumors Demi-God

    givemeanapple

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2016
    Location:
    Earth
    #3
    Apple looks like that kid on the school who keeps crying because some other kid stole his candy.
     
  4. B4U macrumors 68000

    B4U

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2012
    Location:
    Undisclosed location
    #4
    Like a couple trying to divorce but still sleeping in the same bed, yet fighting over who gets what...
     
  5. macTW Suspended

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2016
    #5
    Samsung looks like that kid on the school who keeps passing classes because he is cheating and copying some other kids.
     
  6. keysofanxiety macrumors G3

    keysofanxiety

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    #6
    Crying or not, you're not disputing the candy was stolen. Maybe that's the important part. :)
     
  7. macsba macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2015
    Location:
    Next to my Mac.
  8. now i see it macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2002
    #8
    Such a strange strange relationship these two companies have with each other. Legal enemies. Manufacturing pals. So odd.
     
  9. macfacts macrumors 68030

    macfacts

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2012
    Location:
    Cybertron
    #9
    The "stolen candy" was one chocolate chip piece. Hardly justifies a lawsuit asking for millions of dollars.
     
  10. DUIduckSAUCE Suspended

    DUIduckSAUCE

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2016
    #10
    Apple v Samsung lawsuit threads are glorious.
     
  11. keysofanxiety macrumors G3

    keysofanxiety

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    #11
    Must have been a pretty big chocolate chip piece! The lawsuit was quite thorough. And that 132 page internal Samsung document confirmed what most people already suspected.

    It's a little easier now to look back and gloss over the iPhone's influence. Smartphones today are ubiquitous. But Samsung copied as much as they could. Not just icons and UI, but packaging and all the rest.

    It's not to say Apple haven't ever stolen anything. However it is blatantly obvious that Samsung copied as much as they could in this instance. I'm sure people can admit that, even if they have personal reservations about Apple. :)
     
  12. givemeanapple macrumors Demi-God

    givemeanapple

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2016
    Location:
    Earth
    #13
    "Good Artists copy Great Artists steal" - Steve Jobs. In this case it seems that the stealer/copier did a better job.
     
  13. 69Mustang macrumors 603

    69Mustang

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2014
    Location:
    In between a rock and a hard place
    #14
    As much as I love a good analogy, this thread topic will probably be better served if we avoid sweetening it up chocolate influences. :D

    Just a guess, but I think that judgement will be sliced in half and Samsung will end up paying about $200 million. Considering most of those patents have been shot down the world over, it's likely that will continue here. The good thing is a lowered judgment benefits Apple as much as, if not more, it benefits Samsung. It would set a precedent that patent trolls can't ask for out-sized judgments from Apple for a simple component claim.
    --- Post Merged, Feb 7, 2017 ---
    Already paid in 2015. Looking for a refund.
     
  14. tooltalk, Feb 7, 2017
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2017

    tooltalk macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2015
    Location:
    NY, NY
    #15
    wonder if Lucy Koh is going to preside over the damage only trial again. Judge Koh has been on the news quite a bit for a possible appellate court appointment last year. Based on what I've seen through the Apple and Samsung trials, she's anything, but impartial -- and her potential appointment to the appellate court seems to explain her behavior.
     
  15. Kabeyun macrumors 68000

    Kabeyun

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Location:
    Eastern USA
    #16
    I'm sure you've seen this:
    [​IMG]
     
  16. tooltalk macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2015
    Location:
    NY, NY
    #17
    Is that Steve Jobs?
     
  17. Kabeyun macrumors 68000

    Kabeyun

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Location:
    Eastern USA
    #18
    Um, what?
     
  18. Whimseh macrumors member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2010
    #19
    Jeeze just give it UP ALREADY!!!! Tired of hearing about this.
     
  19. Sefstah macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2015
    #20
    Apple owes me and all of its users money, for not innovating anymore, and forcing dongles on us.
     
  20. sudo1996 Suspended

    sudo1996

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2015
    Location:
    Berkeley, CA, USA
    #21
    Hmm, maybe it's time for Mr. Trump to issue an executive order... :D
     
  21. xDKP macrumors 65816

    xDKP

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Location:
    Denmark
    #22
    To me this is a way more comical look at the US Justice systems.. What is going on here? I know I don't have all the details but it seems like they ruled a verdict way back and keep undermining their own verdict and ruling?
     
  22. macs4nw macrumors 601

    macs4nw

    #23
    It's about democracy in action, the right to appeal rulings one feels are unjust, to a higher court.
     
  23. xDKP macrumors 65816

    xDKP

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Location:
    Denmark
    #24
    I agree and we have the same system in Denmark, but this feels like it's been appealed like 6-7 times now?
     
  24. Gachiennuocmam macrumors member

    Gachiennuocmam

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2017
    #25
    So that is why you dont have any patents.
     

Share This Page