Then we have to agree to disagree on two key points. First, when you have a dominant platform like the iPad or iPhone, and they completely control the content that you can put on it, they absolutely do IMHO have the ability to practice censorship. Censorship is defined as "suppressing content deemed objectionable on moral, military, political, or other grounds." Apple openly says the restrict content they deem morally objectionable. So i don't see how anyone can argue they don't censor. And second, i agree with one of the prior posters who said that it is our job as parents (i have three daughters) to make sure our kids are watching what we think it is best for them to watch. While you might thing it makes things easier for you personally to just have someone that agrees with you on what content you personally like to restrict content for everyone... you are taking away other people's ability to see and view and listen to what they wish. This to me is a very selfish, and dangerous path.
[doublepost=1509044500][/doublepost]
Haha.... i agree with you there. Others, like Grumpy Mom, clearly disagree. For violence perhaps we all agree. But what i'm firmly against is that she thinks its okay to tell us what we should like or be able to watch, instead of just letting adults make up their own minds and watch what makes them happy.
And as for sexuality and nudity... i wish everyone had a chance to go to Europe and watch television over there. They have nudity and sexuality on regular channels all the time. And regular channels after 8 or 9 at night can turn into soft porn practically. They are just much more open minded about it, and it is much more of a natural thing. Its such a big deal here because people make it such.
I don’t want to tell you what to watch or not watch. I don’t want to impose on you in any way and I will certainly be considerate enough to contemplate your point of view further. I know you don’t know me, but some people on this forum have engaged in discussion with me before and know I try to give a fair hearing to opposing points of view. It’s not unheard of for me to end up being persuaded to the other point of view, as long as I’m treated with consideration and respect.
I do see what is bothering you about this. I don’t have a handy solution that makes everyone happy. The only thing I can think of is, if you feel your interests are in danger of being marginalized or in effect banned, perhaps there is something you and others who feel the same can do to persuade Apple to provide another subsection of their walled garden that has the content you prefer. That seems reasonable to me. We all can get what we want.
It does require a bit of effort but people who sought things on the flip side like parental controls and beefed up ratings systems had to also exert effort to get their side heard and acted upon. I don’t imagine Apple wants to alienate a significant part of their customer base. I think they are just trying to offer a particular environment to a subset of their customers they may feel comprise a lucrative market.
~~Okay the rest of this is TL/DR so you can skip it if you wish.~~
I just want to attempt to clarify my perspective. I say “attempt” because I’m not a very good writer and struggle all of the time for the right words to express myself. It is why I’m not good at being concise.
Anyway, it is not necessarily the themes I object to. It’s how these themes are often handled. I’ve watched enough and read enough to see there’s too much objectification of women’s bodies in the way sex and sexual violence is portrayed in the media and our culture. I know at the root of it is that it’s not because there’s a higher purpose of improving the quality of a story or anything like that. It’s because it sells. It’s what apparently most people want to see. And the majority rules and I accept that and try to live with the way it is.
But it is not an easy thing for me as a woman to accept as part of entertainment. As a very very little child I narrowly escaped a man who likely was going to rape and kill me. There were women in my family who were victimized and traumatized in the graphic ways depicted in movies and tv shows so again, it’s something I can’t find any redeemable entertainment value in personally, the way women’s bodies are used in so many shows.
And sadly I also see or hear of men being more objectified and subjected to humiliation in graphic ways in entertainment. I just find it hard to watch. It hurts my heart. It’s got nothing to do with me being stuck in the past or overtly religious or any of the many things other people in this thread assume about people with my viewing preferences. I just have a visceral reaction of despair, pain or unease to so much of what is depicted in entertainment. I do not find edification or entertaininment in the blatant visuals, for lack of a better way to put it.
Again, it’s not the themes per se. As a very young child I watched the mini series “Roots” and the original mini series certainly did not shy away from tackling and depicting the horrors experienced by a slave. As an audience we were aware what happened to Kunta Kinte and the scene where he is brutally maimed was filmed in a way that let the audience experience it without wallowing in the depravity of seeing his foot actually hacked off.
In some ways that made the whole horror easier to process rather than hardening us to it. Because you do sort of have to detach yourself from your emotions to endure watching someone actually graphically maimed right before your eyes. Even if you know it’s not real. Because you know these things happen in reality.
I just out of curiosity looked up the original film and saw there had been a remake in 2016. The remake has the scene “My name is Toby” handled very differently. While it is more gory, it is less effective in my opinion. The original had Le Var Burton portray his suffering with amazing acting and his moans of pain let you know this was horrific suffering even if they didn’t show his back being bloodied the way it is in the remake. Meanwhile they juxtaposed those sounds with his friend pleading with the indifferent master over his fate. The indifference of the master and the fact the desperate slave felt he had to beg mercy for his friend in terms of protecting the master’s financial investment perfectly encapsulated the horror of slavery: it was not just the sadism itself but the reduction of human lives to mere financial commodities. And supposedly respectable men using the institution of slavery to rip the very identity of another human being away from them. I think by focusing on the gore and amping up the violence of the scene, the remake detracted from the message compared to the way the original handled it.
Oh well I have only a few more years left on this planet anyway and absolutely zero influence on anything that happens on it. So don’t mind me. This is Apple’s decision, not mine and there are more people like you than there are like me. I’m not the demographic any business seeks. I have a feeling you will get your way before long.