Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Watch 2 Rumored to Include Cellular Connectivity Amid Push for iPhone Independency
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Everyone keeps forgetting about the BAND. There is already a third party company, reservestrap (See http://reservestrap.com/blogs/news/143508487-apple-watch-cellphone-strap) that has embedded a SIM card and the extra juice to run it in a smart band for the Apple Watch. If someone else can do it, you don't think Apple can do it better?
It's kind of hard not to speak awkwardly into it though. I mean, you're talking to your wrist in public. It's going to attract attention, and if it's quiet enough, everyone will hear your phone call. Or, you'll be yelling at your wrist if it's too loud. I don't see how to make it not awkward
One possibility is for Apple to adopt something like Samsung R&D's new "TipTalk" watchband, which they showed off to good reviews at CES... and which will supposedly go on sale later this year.
Mostly meant for privately listening to voice mail, it sends the audio up your arm so only you can hear it when you put your finger to your ear. Another good thing about this method, is that holding your finger to your ear is already a socially known gesture to indicate that you are engaged in listening to something important.
For a two-way phone, you'd need a similar method for the microphone. Maybe a way to pick up your voice going the other way down. Or perhaps a mike on a pinky finger ring, so you can do the ubiquitous holding-a-phone-to-your-head "call me" thumb and pinky gesture that everyone also knows. (There's actually a glove phone like that.)
Last edited:
Not at all. If I have to make an excuse and schedule daily "recharges" for my smartwatch, it's use as a watch is nullified. For those times when I need a watch, wear, use as needed, take off when done, is the plan. For a monitor, my fitbit lasts days.
My use / need. For me, a smartwatch did nothing to enhance my life nor replace my smartphone.
[doublepost=1461686167][/doublepost]
Why? A smartwatch can and should be many things. Some want BT/WF only while others want LTE/4G. Some want it as an accessory to a smartphone while others want a device that can pair with a smartphone as needed. Some with any smartphone as needed.
Currently the Apple Watch is an iPhone accessory. It's time it grew up.
Decided to buy another Apple Watch after selling my first model.
I honestly don't care for cellular connectivity. My phone is always with in a reasonable distance.
I would like the watch to be slightly sleeker., but am damn happy.
I honestly don't care for cellular connectivity. My phone is always with in a reasonable distance.
I would like the watch to be slightly sleeker., but am damn happy.
Processor speed is a factor, but the BT-to-Watch-to-internet round trip is a far more prominent constraint. Compare any native function on the watch with any function that has to reach out for external data, and it's clear that the lack of direct connectivity is the culprit. The phone apps for Transit and Citymapper yield information instantly, while they often take 10 seconds on the watch.
IF you use it continuously. This is the assumption a lot of people make when trying to discredit the idea, of any power hungry technologies. The current battery life when using the watch continuously as a phone is 3 hours. So guess what, people don't use the watch exclusively for making phone calls, but the option exists. And which is better, having the option to occasionally use something, or not having the option at all?
Now, now, it'll be okay.
Apple's coming room sized wireless charging system will bathe your entire body in a charming electrical glow that will keep the watch going.
Believe me, the battery life of the watch will be the least of your worries about life and longevity at that point.
90% my patoot. I HAD a pebble...over and done
[doublepost=1461699551][/doublepost]
Give ya 50
Nah, there are already smart watches with both cell functionality and bluetooth (which is the only sensible way of using them as a phone) that easily lasts 2 days of regular use today. The 1,5 year old Samsung Galaxy Gear S being a good example, still my favorite in the smart watch category by a huge margin.
Bluetooth these days does not need much power. Back in the day people used to turn off bluetooth on their phones when not having a device connected to save power, I just leave mine on all the time now, doesn't seem to make much of a difference.
Somehow I don't believe you... I'm sure it would last 2 days if you don't actually do anything with the watch, you have just claimed a watch that is older than the Apple watch, lasts double the time an Apple watch does currently yet with more battery draining features and a 300 mAh battery.
What's the talktime of the watch?
Every single smart watch out there outlasts the Apple watch by a huge margin when it comes to battery capacity. Open your eyes and throw a glance outside of the walled garden once in a while.
Yet, the early smart watches were ridiculed for lasting just a couple of days. When the Apple watch arrived though, one day was suddenly accepted as 'good enough' by the majority of the tech press for some odd reason.
So EVERY SINGLE smart watch not made by Apple when used the same as the Apple watch will out last the Apple watch? Prove it then.
No need for me to prove it, there are hundreds of reviews online confirming it. But whatever you do don't google it, it will just break your neat little world into tiny pieces.
Here's a couple of quick ones:
Samsung Gear S2: "I found myself getting to a third day of use with the screen set to middle brightness -- not bad at all."
http://www.cnet.com/products/samsung-gear-s2/2/
The Gear S (with cell functionality) has a significantly lower battery capacity than the 360's 320mAh and the G Watch R's 410mAh but I was able to get almost two days of usage before needing to charge up again. Usage here means having the pedometer on, getting notifications, messing around with apps, texting, checking emails and of course, using the phone.
http://www.techradar.com/reviews/wearables/samsung-gear-s-1263307/review/5
Last edited:
I was actually referring to the claim you made about EVERY smartwatch. Not your Samsung watch.
Can some one tell me if this new smartwatch will replace the iPhone? You will not need iPhone or any smartphone?
You can do e-mail, texting and make calls on his news smartwatch? This new smartwatch is like small iPhone? You can do all the things on this smartwatch that you can do on your iPhone?
You will not have to own a iPhone?
You can do e-mail, texting and make calls on his news smartwatch? This new smartwatch is like small iPhone? You can do all the things on this smartwatch that you can do on your iPhone?
You will not have to own a iPhone?
They may sell two models, the wi-fi and the cellular like they do with iPad.
I wouldn't buy the cellular model but some people would, there is a demand for GPS on the Watch and the ability to receive a call would be interesting to a part of the market.
With a cellular Watch it would be possibile to have a Watch and an iPad and get rid of the phone. Some people may be interested in that scenario (I'm not one of them) but it is a possibility. Tiny screen to handle notifications and bigger screen for everything else. I don't think it is necessary to have at the same time a Watch, an iPhone and an iPad, too many devices.
The main problem with a cellular Watch is battery life. The hotspot kills the battery on an iPhone, imagine what would happen on a Watch if it had to share connection with an iPad.
I wouldn't buy the cellular model but some people would, there is a demand for GPS on the Watch and the ability to receive a call would be interesting to a part of the market.
With a cellular Watch it would be possibile to have a Watch and an iPad and get rid of the phone. Some people may be interested in that scenario (I'm not one of them) but it is a possibility. Tiny screen to handle notifications and bigger screen for everything else. I don't think it is necessary to have at the same time a Watch, an iPhone and an iPad, too many devices.
The main problem with a cellular Watch is battery life. The hotspot kills the battery on an iPhone, imagine what would happen on a Watch if it had to share connection with an iPad.
*sigh*
This is just dumb if true. Cook really has no clue. Reminds me of Sculley. The killer feature of the watch has nothing to do with cellular connectivity. It has to do with health monitoring. Please focus your efforts there you numskull!
This is just dumb if true. Cook really has no clue. Reminds me of Sculley. The killer feature of the watch has nothing to do with cellular connectivity. It has to do with health monitoring. Please focus your efforts there you numskull!
I guess it's really personal preference. The Gear s3 has an awesome round look and the UI to me is superior to the AW. For all of them the buttons need to be turned into touch/force sensitive areas or relocated/reconfigured as fidgeting with these things gets irritating after a while. As of course smart watches demand much more interaction than a normal watch.
I would be ok with it if I didn't have to pay for a separate plan. Otherwise, I don't have a compelling need for the watch to be independent of the phone since I rarely use the watch without the phone nearby or on the same wifi network.
[doublepost=1461876443][/doublepost]
Not this round obsession again
I really don't understand it. I guess you don't like to read text comfortably on the watch.
It's interesting to read the rather wide variety of opinions on the one product that's not lived up to the hype. Fortunately with nearly endless resources and the finest marketing department in the universe, Apple can create whatever image they want for the next version of this iOS device. Perhaps whatever Apple chooses to do will catch the publics eye.