Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Pono

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Feb 13, 2021
1
0
Here's some data that shows how far off a brand new Series 6 can be on altitude. The exact same running course was followed.

gain lowest elevation highest elevation
February 2nd 952 feet 461 feet 1420 feet
February 8th 945 feet 386 feet 1374 feet
February 13th 939 feet 614 feet 1560 feet

Clearly the relative change in altitude is a lot more accurate than the absolute altitude of the lowest and highest points. The gain only has an error of 1.3% versus the average of the three gain numbers. The 228 foot difference (614' - 386') in starting elevation is just totally unacceptable.
Some (many) of us bought this watch thinking that the altitude numbers themselves (not just the change or gain) would be accurate.
 
Mine was like that when it was new. I’ve had it nearly two months now and it is incredibly accurate every time. If the barometric pressure (local) has dropped much below 1000mbar the compass app elevation figure can be inaccurate but as soon as I start a GPS activity the elevation figures are spot on and pretty much identical for repeat runs. It’s the most accurate altimeter on any watch that I’ve had so far - way better than my Garmins. I just wish the HRM was better as it’s not as good or reliable as my Garmins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StumpyBloke
OP, already a thread here:

 
  • Like
Reactions: Cheefy
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.