@StumpyBloke I'm going to venture a guess that location comes from GPS. The +/- 23.91m is a pretty typical margin of error for non-ideal conditions.
As for 70m +/- 10m and 86m +/- 5m -- are you in a flat location or does the ground topography change somewhat? Reason I ask is that from where I'm sitting right now, 20m one way vs the other would definitely account for ~5m elevation differences.
Also note that air pressure changes a bit under 1mmHg per 10 meter elevation change (when near sea level). The two photos show a difference of over 3mmHg, and thus just that would represent a bit over 30m elevation differential (unless I'm way off in my math?)
I think the takeaway here is I don't think we can expect substantial accuracy or agreement on absolute elevation information, particularly when the underlying data sources are unknow. Are they working purely from barometric pressure? Is the know pressure at a known location that day factored in? Is the ground location being used in some way, and if so what specific metric is being considered? Is GPS elevation being considered, which is already known to have a high level of variance from actual?
Finally - what's up with displaying Pa, kPa,
and hPa on the same display? Can folks not move a decimal point quickly in their heads?
Edit - checked my AmbientWeather weatherstation. Since 24 hours ago, relative pressure here has gone from 765.556mmHg to 760.222mmHg -- and at ~14mmHg per 150m (appropriate for my elevation), that'd show a 40+ meter elevation difference?
Kinda out of my usual territory here so please correct my #'s if I've botched something. General point is barometric pressure is good for relative differences in elevation but gets complicated to use it for absolute elevation.
Elevation above sea level - in feet and meter - with barometric and atmospheric pressure - <i>inches mercury, psia, kg/cm<sup>2</sup> and kPa</i>.
www.engineeringtoolbox.com