iMessage is far more useful to me, vs. phone calls. That said, I'm not in the habit of trusting just any open WiFi network.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Watch Can Use Known Wi-Fi Networks for Limited Functions Even When iPhone Is Off
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I wore a watch up until about 8 years ago. I have enjoyed not having anything on my wrist. Getting me to drop a few hundred bills on a watch will be an especially hard sell. Maybe by v4 to v6 it will have a killer function but for now I'll sit on the sidelines.
Why is this notable? Apple said that even when theWatch is out of your iPhone's Bluetooth range but on the same WiFi network they can communicate to each other, that doesn't mean they have only have a direct WiFi connection to each other.
They never said that anything about them "being on the same wifi network", all they said was that they communicated over wifi when out of Bluetooth range. The assumption was that it was using the iPhone's wifi to make the connection. Kinda like a hot spot. Many assumed that since the Watch can't login to a wifi network, that this was how it worked.
That's a great point. It's easy to forget the iPhone didn't launch with an App Store, or 3G networking, and had only as much storage as an iPod nano.
Holy smokes.
Personally, I'm looking forward to the wide range of Hello Kitty options.
Why is this notable? Apple said that even when the
Apple hadn't (AFAIK)) come right out and indicated it would operate standalone vs. just using WiFi for iPhone communication. Per the reviewer:
We could _assume_ that since it has WiFi capabilities it could/would/should be able to establish a connection and operate independently, but with Apple, you never know (see NCF that's for payments only vs. file transfer/airdrop/etc)
I'll be the first to admit I was wrong once it's actually been determined to work that way.
No, this is marketing trying to sell you on a new iPhone to work with your new Apple Watch.
I think very few people think it's a *bad* product. Lots of people, however, think it's an *unnecessary* product (and product category). Very different critique.
Considering that most of the bashing has been that it can't do anything without the phone, it is a significant item. I think most would agree with that assessment. But, I have said it before - the Apple Watch might not be for the majority people here - whether that is 49% or 1%.
I don't know the answer to this, but is there any other Smartwatch that can do this at all? Since we are talking about 2015? Some are on revision 3.
----------
This one new tidbit would be a very good item that would be nice to have if you forgot your phone or outside cell phone range but have wi-fi or your phone is dead.
To me this is a necessary product at least for one new item that wasn't mentioned before. But I am sure it will be ripped.
Last edited:
Gear S has its own SIM so is totally independent from a phone other than loading apps. Don't know if there are any others.
Umm yes apple has said previously have you seen the keynote. They say in the keynote it can use wifi and the phone can communicate width the watch on the same local wifi as well
Exactly.
I just tested this by sending some SMS texts back & forth between my iMac at home and my phone here at work. So the watch should work with SMS texts - this is great news because if I go out walking I can just bring my watch, and likely still have a way to communicate if i have to (there are cable company hotspots throughout my area).
As long as I don't get lost and need an accurate map
Did you send the SMS to another iphone? if so it was iMessage which a Mac can send over wifi without an iphone. Try sending to an Android device to verify it was real SMS.
1) Did they change the wording of the article because it says nothing of SMS.
2) It's still technically possible, and we know this because of iOS 8 and Yosemite's Continuity feature of forwarding SMS/MMS to the Messages app. This means that if your iPhone was on and an SMS came in it could forward via iCloud to the Messages app, which could be picked up by Watch OS even when your iPhone isn't tethered via the same local network. I'm not saying that has been set up, but it's certainly possible with their current tech.
Wow, great news on limited wifi access on the Apple watch. haha maybe you can surf the web on a small screen.
Since I've eliminated myself from buying this piece of fluff (it doesn't add any net value to my Apple experience). I think the watch is an interesting direction to go but I don't wear a watch and it would be an adjustment to have one on again. Maybe rev 2 or 3 will more feature rich and cheaper.
I doubt we'll see a big jump in Rev 2. Probably be incremental and at the same price. 3 will add many more features but at the same price. Rev 4 will be the price drop. This is based on iPod Touch history.
I don't recall the iPad being called as polarizing as the Watch. I think this is a great device that is over priced. The iPad was a full blown device. The Apple Watch is more of an accessory... for now.
I still want one. I just think it's $100 more expensive that it should be for the base models.