Apple Watch generation comparison

Discussion in 'Apple Watch' started by Be3G, May 10, 2018.

  1. Be3G, May 10, 2018
    Last edited: May 10, 2018

    Be3G macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2007
    #1
    Hi all,

    I'm not sure how useful this will be to anyone else but having been an Apple Watch series 0 owner for a couple of years I've been pondering upgrading to something a bit newer, but was getting a bit confused by what the actual differences are between different generations. So I thought I'd compare spec sheets and Apple's Watch user guide to make a comprehensive list of changes to aid my decision! Having done that, I thought I might as well post it here too in case any else does find the information useful.

    Note that I haven't bothered including series 0 in the list as I just wanted to document the changes between it and subsequent generations. Also note that the list is cumulative, i.e. every generation includes the new features from the generations above (aside obviously from CPU changes).

    Series 1

    Dual-core processor
    Full heart rate features
    Workout playlists

    Series 2

    GPS and GLONASS
    Water resistant to 50m + water lock
    2.22× screen brightness
    Wake screen on crown up

    Series 3 GPS

    Faster dual-core processor
    W2 wireless chip
    Galileo and QZSS
    Barometric altimeter
    Siri speaks
    Supports AirPower
    Bluetooth 4.2*
    Radio + music streaming

    Series 3 LTE (requires iPhone 6)

    2× storage capacity
    LTE and UMTS
    Explorer watch face

    * Actually the situation with Bluetooth doesn't seem to be as simple as this: scouring spec sheets, it looks like the series 1 has had a silent spec change to include BT4.2 too as of series 3's release in 2017. As far as I can tell, series 2 only ever included BT4.0.
     
  2. Lennyvalentin macrumors 65816

    Lennyvalentin

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2011
    #2
    As I recall, the S1 and S2 both shared the same SoC/dual core CPU.

    Also, didn't the S2 have dual mics or somesuch? It has two holes below the speaker, versus just 1 hole on the OG Watch models.
     
  3. Be3G thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2007
    #3
    There's definitely a different chip in each of the two watches (see here) although I make no comment on the practical differences in terms of speed etc.

    As for microphones, I haven't seen anything to suggest there's a different microphone configuration on the series 2, so I suspect the holes you're thinking of are the air vents which are part of the added water resistance for swimming.
     
  4. tobefirst macrumors 68040

    tobefirst

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2005
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    #4
    My initial thought was what @Lennyvalentin said. @Be3G 's link shows that there are differences, but that might just be the GPS Glonass part. I do recall them being the same speed, but that was awhile ago, admittedly.
     
  5. Relentless Power, May 10, 2018
    Last edited: May 10, 2018

    Relentless Power macrumors Penryn

    Relentless Power

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    #5
    Both watches actually share the _same_ dual core processor (SoC/dual core CPU) for the Series 1 and Series 2, Thats Actually the core similarity between both models, which Apple specifically commented on during the keynote.

    Also, the Series 1 is only 450 Nits of brightness (Same as First Gen Watch), where as the Series 2 is 1000 Nits, Which was inherently shared for the Series 3 accordingly.
     
  6. klymr macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    May 16, 2007
    Location:
    Utah
    #6
    Lennyvalentin is correct. The S1P and the S2 contain the same dual-core processor and GPU in the SiP (System in a Package). The difference in the package is the addition of the GPS/Glonass in the S2.
     
  7. Lennyvalentin macrumors 65816

    Lennyvalentin

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2011
    #7
    But the 'air vent' you're thinking of is for pressure equalization for the barometer, which afaik the watch didn't get until S3... So the second hole has to fill some other purpose I'd think, because just plain water proofing would have no need for extra holes in the casing. In fact more holes is counterproductive from a purely waterproofing point of view. :)
     
  8. Julien macrumors G4

    Julien

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Location:
    Atlanta
    #8
    [Theory]Apple may have determined that the one hole was not sufficient in all circumstances for the barometer and therefor decided not to activate it until a redesign.[/Theory]
     
  9. Be3G thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2007
    #9
    Noted. Will amend the post!

    This is already mentioned in my list of differences. :)

    Well, it's shown as an air vent in the watchOS user guide, marked as present in series 2 or above, so I assumed it was something to do with moisture control (helping the watch dry out after a swim?) but that is speculation on my part.
     

Share This Page