Normal for me. I would rate it very warm, but not hot. Every device I have ever owned gets warm to hot when it charges. I suspect that the AW is warmer than some, because the inductive interface is less efficient than a direct wire connection (transformers get very hot, and the induction link is effectively a transformer).
Probably due to the inefficiency in the inductive loops inside the watch. Those loops are energized, regardless of whether the watch is using the power.My watch is warm, even though it has to done charging hours ago, why would it still be warm.
Same here. I wear mine into bed, which means it usually doesn't charge overnight, but I leave it on the charger long enough to go from 40%-ish up to 100%. If I pull it off the charger while it's charging or soon after it hits 100%, it's pretty warm. But if I wait longer (maybe an hour, I'm guessing) and then pull it off the charger, it's cooled down, almost back to normal.I've noticed mine seems to be warmest if I take it off while it is actively charging. Most mornings I am taking it off hours after it should have reached 100% and on most mornings it doesn't feel warm to me at all. I have never felt it get truly hot.
Newsflash- batteries get warm whilst being charged. If you don't know that by now you never will.
When the charge drops a few percent (the device is on and using current) it will start charging again and 'top off' and charge again. This will likely happen several times during the course of being on the charger for 8 hours. Also the last 10% (90% to 100%) of a lit-ion's charge is done at the slowest rate and will produce the most waste heat.Newsflash: In the morning the batteries should have been charged hours ago so the charging is over and the heat must be coming from the induction coils
When the charge drops a few percent (the device is on and using current) it will start charging again and 'top off' and charge again. This will likely happen several times during the course of being on the charger for 8 hours. Also the last 10% (90% to 100%) of a lit-ion's charge is done at the slowest rate and will produce the most waste heat.
Me too, that is why I said "likely". 😉 We can only offer an opinion since Apple has no real reason and is not going to release this info. I'm just basing my opinion off the way lit-ion's work in general.Not so sure about this happening several times during 8 hours on the charger.....
Wireless charging is usually warmer than wired charging.
I am surprised that some of the people worried about saving our resources have not complained about how inefficient wireless charging is.
Watch would like use about ¼ to ⅛ of this even accounting for the approximate 25% loss in efficiency of inductive charging. So the 25% loss would be probably be around 10¢ to 30¢ of electricity costs per year.An average cell phone only uses about 3 kWh to 4 kWh of electricity per year. AnWatch would like use about ¼ to ⅛ of this even accounting for the approximate 25% loss in efficiency of inductive charging. So the 25% loss would be probably be around 10¢ to 30¢ of electricity costs per year.
Loops are not energized if not charging. That's part of the technology of wireless charging -- how to shut it off when power is not needed.Probably due to the inefficiency in the inductive loops inside the watch. Those loops are energized, regardless of whether the watch is using the power.
I have three Apple watches, a 0, 2, and 3LTE. All of them are variable from room temperature to slightly warm after sitting on their chargers, often different from one day to another, and I’ve always thought that was probably connected to whether they were updating music playlists or other content while sitting.