Crazy question but I've noticed that some ppl end up returning either an Apple Watch or iPhone more then once within their 14 days, does apple limit the amount of times you can return something even though your within the 14 day return period?
Crazy question but I've noticed that some ppl end up returning either an Apple Watch or iPhone more then once within their 14 days, does apple limit the amount of times you can return something even though your within the 14 day return period?
OP probably meant multiple exchanges within a 14 day period.Do you mean if someone buys a product, returns it, then buys another one and returns it again? Because you can only return an item once. How do you return something a 2nd time if it's already been returned?
I've never heard of this flag system, but surely that only applies if someone consistently returns devices that have nothing wrong with them and/or were not misrepresented (feature wise)?
The flagging system is at the discretion of the Apple Store manager. It is quite real.
Interesting - it wouldn't be legal in many countries if the products being returned were either faulty or were not working as advertised.
It is alive and well in America. As it should be. These are business owners who get abused by a small number of customers. They have a right, with in the law, to protect themselves from crazy customers.
Interesting - it wouldn't be legal in many countries if the products being returned were either faulty or were not working as advertised.
Yes, I’m sure the projected first trillion dollar company is being victimized.
Apple has a return policy. So long as a customer stays within the policy guidelines, I’m not sure Apple can say too much.
It is alive and well in America. As it should be. These are business owners who get abused by a small number of customers. They have a right, with in the law, to protect themselves from crazy customers.
I don't believe they would refuse to serve the customer in this case. However, instead of continuing to facilitate multiple exchanges, they could simply offer a refund instead. It would largely depend on the reason. For a genuine fault, sure.
However, do you remember the Samsung vs TSMC debacle with the 6S? There were customers who would purchase phone after phone, test at home, then want to exchange until they received the one with Samsung parts. I believe it's fair to draw a line with these customers and either refuse the exchange, or simply offer a full refund.
So am I misunderstanding something here or are you and everyone who has liked your post supporting businesses being able to tread all over consumer's rights to return faulty product or a product which does not perform as it's been advertised by blacklisting them?
You still do not get it.
You have read the posts here, there are people who have returned items for even an imagined defect, many time Apple will do it just to make the customer happy but some push it too far and it does nothing but raise the cost of Apple products for all of us.
Been buying Apple products for a long time and have never known them to not have exemplary customer serve. Apple has rights too. They have a right to not allow some crazy customers from taking advantage. It is good for Apple and their customers.
You sound like you hate them because they are successful? Typical.
Apple must be doing something right, as you say, they are on the way to being the first trillion dollar company!
Too bad the person that started this thread never returned to actually clarify the situation...
Too bad the person that started this thread never returned to actually clarify the situation...
For that, I apologize to the OP.
You haven't read my posts in this thread thoroughly as not once have I have advocated people returning things for no reason.
Read your old posts. You clearly haven't read the thread thoroughly nor been clear, doing the precise "vague" describing you accuse him of.
I actually think this is just a complete misunderstanding between two forum members so there's probably not much point in getting involved.
I believe we are both agreeing with each other but failing to express it in a way that either understands.