That's one way to look at it. The other consideration is that it will benefit people who don't fall within the statistical "high risk" categories and who fall under the age where health authorities recommend regular testing, and who may only discover they have a heart problem after wearing an Apple Watch.Actually, false positives use up resources in a system with limited resources. If you waste it somewhere, you reduce health elsewhere.
The cases of lives been saved due to ECG seems to be one off cases where people haven’t had standard tests that we in Australia can get for free.
also, what the government really wants is people to get a comprehensive test at 45, 50 etc and if people put that off because their watch says they’re healthy, thats a problem.
Symptoms of many heart problems are the same as symptoms linked with other more benign conditions - so even with ECGs being comparatively more available and affordable to Australians (provided they aren't indigenous or low income and subject to waiting lists, and haven't maxed out their Medicare limits for ECGs) than to people in many other countries, it still comes down to a doctor being compelled to order a test based on the symptoms they're being presented with.