Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Samsung isn't in the top 5? Xiaomi is in 2nd place? I have never seen one in the wild. I'm guessing they are more popular in the Asian markets.

Poor Pebble...they were the Blackberry of smart watches.
 
I don't want my watch to be a prescriptive diagnostic tool. I just want it to give me notifications, track my workouts, and have a battery that lasts more than a day.
I agree, I don't want to know if I'm going to have a heart attack or stoke. That that **** be a surprise. /s
 
I DO want my watch to have medical diagnostics. Evidently so do a lot of other people otherwise every smart watch maker wouldn’t be trying so hard to add them.
I agree with your point, but keep in mind sometimes changes are driven by customers demanding a particular feature and companies rushing to supply the demand, and sometimes changes are driven by the companies looking for something new to sell to customers - like 3D TV. Companies working on a new thing isn't necessarily evidence that everybody wants said new thing.
 
Was there any data on the percentage sold between LTE and non LTE apple watch? Was it actually the LTE capability that helped sales? I don't personally know anyone with an LTE apple watch, but I know at least 15 people that have non LTE.
 
Just purchased a 42mm cellular Nike version with the sale that was going on. It comes today at 3. Very excited to try my new and first Apple Watch.
 
I got a series 3 lte. I like it but I’m not making use of the lte because my carrier is too greedy. By leaving my phone at home, I’m using LESS data, yet they want me to pay an ADDITIONAL $10/mo. No way. I wish I could just transfer an esim when I go jogging. But it’s not dire so I’ll make do. Still has a lot of functionality.
 
I think with LTE the watch gains a lot more freedom. You can actually go for a run or to the gym without a phone and still have music, workouts, tracking, phone calls and messages.

I agree. As much as I enjoy a larger phone for the display and battery life, I don’t always have the desire to carry my iPhone with me everywhere. LTE is a bridge to rectify that in situations where my Phone can be left behind. Furthermore, I would like to see more revision win carrier plans for the LTE Apple plans.
 
I agree with your point, but keep in mind sometimes changes are driven by customers demanding a particular feature and companies rushing to supply the demand, and sometimes changes are driven by the companies looking for something new to sell to customers - like 3D TV. Companies working on a new thing isn't necessarily evidence that everybody wants said new thing.

You’re correct about companies trying to push new and not necessarily popular technology with their devices, and 3D Tv is an excellent example. But Apple first tried to de-emphasize fitness at least in their ads for the first gen Watch and it wasn’t until they started touting the health and fitness features that the Apple Watch started selling better.

But the reason for last years models growth wasn’t fitness but LTE connectivity. So there definitely is a market for non health features as well, and right now the biggest draw probably is the ability to make and receive calls.
 
Samsung isn't in the top 5? Xiaomi is in 2nd place? I have never seen one in the wild. I'm guessing they are more popular in the Asian markets.

Poor Pebble...they were the Blackberry of smart watches.
The Amazfit bip has a ridiculous name but for £40 is incredibly impressive. I sold one and have an aw s3 lte but still use a mi band for sleep tracking (charge once a month). Soon to be replaced by a mi band 3.

Xiaomi product are very underrated and well made, best tech and cheap.
 
Over the last year or so, I have seen more and more people wearing Apple watches. Definitely not exclusive any more

Same. From the McDonald’s drive-thru servers to nurses in the doctor’s office to retail workers to people going about their errands. I see the Watch just about everywhere I go and I’ve noticed them more on women than on men.

Funny enough, the one place where I don’t see the Watch a lot is in the work environment. Still see more traditional timepieces of varying brands in that space. Apple Watches are there, just not as much.
 
Please stop with this nonsense that it is LTE that "finally" has given the aWatch traction. The most recent figures I can find show LTE-enabled aWatches as about 20% of sales.
That's nice, but what it shows is that LTE is a minority taste, useful for a few people (who are disproportionately represented among the journalist and twittering classes); but irrelevant to the broader success of the aWatch.
[doublepost=1536097580][/doublepost]

This doesn't make sense for MECHANICAL reasons. Do you know how painful it is to hold your wrist CONTINUALLY pointing at your face? Do you know how unpleasant it is to look at shaky-cam that's constantly shooting all over the place as the other persons arm keeps moving around?

What DOES make sense, however, is video playback. Even though you probably don't want to watch an actual movie on your wrist, many forms of video (like lectures and podcasts) are basically audio, with only occasional glances necessary to see the video. I think that sort of content (along with smarts like shutting down the video when it's not at "viewing angle") SHOULD be supported.
[doublepost=1536097979][/doublepost]
You’re correct about companies trying to push new and not necessarily popular technology with their devices, and 3D Tv is an excellent example. But Apple first tried to de-emphasize fitness at least in their ads for the first gen Watch and it wasn’t until they started touting the health and fitness features that the Apple Watch started selling better.

But the reason for last years models growth wasn’t fitness but LTE connectivity. So there definitely is a market for non health features as well, and right now the biggest draw probably is the ability to make and receive calls.

You completely miss the point of Apple's ads.
EVERY Apple product follows a standard trajectory. You introduce it as something people already know, so they feel comfortable with it, then every year you expand the boundaries of showing what NORMAL people (ie people who are not tech-heads) can do with it.

The aWatch was introduced as a better watch --- focus on watch things like accuracy and fashion.
Next year the focus was on fitness -- because watch was now understood, fitness was an easy extension.
Third year the focus was on LTE --- not to SELL LTE watches, Apple knows that's a minority need, but to emphasize the idea that your watch is also a communications/notification device.
 
I feel like nobody else even advertises their wearable product anymore. I'm aware ifnnewer Fitbit models simply because of their kiosk and product placement in many retailers. I honestly and legitimately don't even know what else is out there right now (in sure I could look and find out beryxeasily but the point isnitbhasnt been in my face ornin the background at all).

On a slight side note, I am amazed at the cost of connectivity to these wearables; I feel like $10 a month, which is a little less than 1/3 of each smartphone line we pay for, is incredivly high for what I am getting out of it.
[doublepost=1536104837][/doublepost]
Over the last year or so, I have seen more and more people wearing Apple watches. Definitely not exclusive any more
Many carriers started offering payment plans. A $400+ wearable is a lot easier to stomache when you're paying $17 a month for it.

That's my theory/observation anyway.
[doublepost=1536104944][/doublepost]
I just wish they charged a reasonable $5 a month for service. $10 is just too much.
Yeah. Tell me about it. Ten years ago $10 a month was the data plan on your smartphone!
 
How long does the charge of the Apple Watch battery last?
Does it track or monitor your sleep quality?
What are the health features?
Any upcoming new features expected for the next gen ones?
What other features or apps do you use that really makes you need the Apple Watch?
 
Samsung isn't in the top 5? Xiaomi is in 2nd place? I have never seen one in the wild. I'm guessing they are more popular in the Asian markets.

Poor Pebble...they were the Blackberry of smart watches.

Maybe being a round watch is not what a lot of people want? :D
 
As far as things that are wearable, I'm pretty sure pants, hats and shirts outsell Apple Watches by a MILE, so I don't know where this report is getting their numbers. Now, if they're talking about wearable COMPUTERS... than maybe so...
[doublepost=1536136640][/doublepost]
That’s the beauty of smart devices. They are Swiss Army Knives, in that the tools are there if needed, but if you don’t want to use the corkscrew, you don’t have to use it. It’s better, because if you need something that isn’t part of the original toolset, you can just add/download it.

Truly great times we live in.

I actually think society was far better before the advent of smartphones and the internet in general.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.